|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
hello all,
sorry to bother you guys with this newbie question but here i go.... I am planning to build a sub to match my speakers. Building an amp and the sub itself won't pose a problem (i think ) Designing a crossover, however, will be as I have never done this. Any hints/links to suggested reading/schematics ? I've been searching for a couple of hours now but almost everything I find is either pretty complicated (for a newbie to filter design anyways) OR has something to do with digital filters. A "howto - build passive xo's" would be great... What i'd really like is a variable passive xo. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan
|
Matjans,
Checkout Rod Elliot's writeup in x-over design here: http://sound.westhost.com/lr-passive.htm The problem with passive x-overs for subs is the components need to be very large (read $$expensive$$). Than to try and make it variable on top of that will send you to the poor house. You can get much better results from bi-amping with an active x-over for not much more money (depending on what you buy).
__________________
Rodd Yamashita |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eugene, OR
|
Crossovers for subs are usuall in the 70-120Hz range. For a passive network the inductor values are large, the losses high and the expense high.
It is more practical to bi-amp and for this you'll be looking at active crossovers. They are easy to calculate and build and I believe there are some PC boards available. I don't have the proper links but I'm sure someone can jump in here and provide them. There is no such thing as a variable passive crossover. |
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan
|
Quote:
This one was designed by the Pass Labs crew. http://www.vidsonix.com/vidsonixnew/..._audio4ind.htm
__________________
Rodd Yamashita |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
i see that my first post was pretty unclear.
I am building a separate sub for HT purposes. All i need info on is a line-level filter design. Be that active or not. I'll bridge an opa or a lm3886 or anything as an amp. sorry for the confusion |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Brantford, ON
|
here is a good link to get you going on active crossovers:
http://www.linkwitzlab.com/filters.htm |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
|
Quote:
Doesn't your av receiver have a built in x/o ? Rob |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Illinois
|
Hi, I want to build a sub crossover too, and was wondering if this would work. It is off the site Joe Dirt sent us to. I would build it as just a lowpass, not even building the highpass part. Would the frequency cutoff be 99hz as in the schematic, or is that something else?
Thanks, Mike |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Illinois
|
oops!
heres the pic. -Mike |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
rob: i'm not using an a/v receiver, my (philips) dvd player has rca outs for front/rear/sub. No center though.
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DJK - Questions on old design. | Stormrider | Solid State | 14 | 30th April 2009 04:59 AM |
| TL design questions | IG81 | Full Range | 7 | 29th January 2009 05:35 AM |
| Some questions on GC design | Mick_F | Chip Amps | 5 | 8th July 2005 09:56 AM |
| Some Design Questions | coolkhoa | Multi-Way | 13 | 17th March 2004 09:19 PM |
| X-over design questions | Milzie | Multi-Way | 7 | 6th November 2002 12:33 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |