|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
|
I have tried to do a M. King-Simulation for the Gradient W 160 AL 8 woofer. Pic 1 shows its TSP and my sim data, Pic 2 the calculated SPL and phase diagramms.
I know that it can be done better, but changing the different parameters leads me nowhere. I constantly get lost in the many adjusting screws I can turn. Can anybody lead me to the appropriate changes/values? Particularly I have no idea, when to change the port values and how to calculate them correctly. My goal is a flat response with Xmax staying below 3 mm. Efficiency is not an issue, because play back levels will be low. Thanks for your effort.
__________________
www.dipolplus.de |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
|
The SPL diagramm:
__________________
www.dipolplus.de |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Actually, for this driver you did pretty darn good! This driver's specs don't lend themselves to plotting the classic T/S max flat alignment due to the high aspect ratio required. I have a fairly good way to quickly calculate pipes and couldn't improve on yours by much, and it's debatable as to whether there's any audible difference. Frankly, as low as these are tuned, whichever alignment you build may require a longer vent to blend into the room's gain better so will probably look more like yours than mine once voiced in-room.
Anyway, for a T/S max flat, I get: L = 42" So/SL = Sd*2.5729 Xo = 0.3547 Rp = 1.25" Lp = 4.75" density = 0.4lbs/ft^3 Since you're not planning on using high power, the vent can be scaled back to Rp = 1", Lp = 2.75" to reduce the upper BW 'ripple' a bit. To get a bit more LF gain, as you appear to want, I recommend: L = 52.88" So/SL = Sd*2.5989 Xo = 0.3352 Rp = 1.25" Lp = 2.75" density = 0.4lbs/ft^3 Again, low power vent can be smaller, Rp =1", Lp = 1.5". Please let us know what you wind up building and what stuffing/vent length you settle on in case someone else wants to use this driver, especially since we're using published specs and our sims could be pretty far off. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Try to fix my sub but got stuck. Advice? | cfcRebel | Subwoofers | 24 | 3rd February 2012 12:31 AM |
| Stuck on Standby | CSlee | Tubes / Valves | 16 | 20th March 2009 05:19 PM |
| Stuck in a dip | ttruman | Multi-Way | 77 | 6th June 2008 12:51 PM |
| Amp stuck on | audiobahnkid592 | Car Audio | 1 | 8th July 2007 11:31 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08413 seconds (72.21% PHP - 27.79% MySQL) with 11 queries |