|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
|
I'm looking into building a complete Home Theater System (6.1) for a room that is fairly large (~600ft2). I'm on a budget (~$750-1000 complete) so I'm looking for the best bang for the buck.
I've seen a ton of projects on various sites and most seem to be MTM 2-way designs. Here are my questions: 1) Is a MTM the best front/center speaker design or is a three way better? 2) I'd imagine that the 3-way would be better at creating the entire range of sounds more accurately then a 2-way (given equivalent drivers), but is it really noticable? 3) Given the fact I'm usging a powered subwoffer, would a 3-way with a woffer even be needed? Any advice you could give on a good HT set-up would be greatly appreciated |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
1) You bring up a lot of questions that don't have yes/no answers.
2) That $750-1000 budget is actually pretty tight. What do you mean by complete? Complete drivers + crossover components for 6 speakers + sub driver + sub amp + wood + finishing? If that is your budget, weighing 2-way vs 3-way is by far less important than just picking budget designs that have earned praise.
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Denmark
|
1.) In HT it would be best if you used the same speakers all the way around. For music however you can't really define it and say that one is better than the other. The 3-way would likely have some more punch to it, and the detail in the midrange would probably be better because the woofer would handle the low frequencies. But you said that you will be operating with at sub so it's not a problem.
2.) As I said before, the MTM can be as good as the 3-way. It just depends on how you look at it. 3.) I would say no. If you make yourself a good sub, that can satisfy your need, then it would not be a problem. I hope that this will help you on your way. The answers here are based on my current knowledge. So anyone please correct me if I'm wrong! Therac |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
I think full range speakers for the front L & R make a much better setup for the average all-in-one music + HT system where diverse media is played.
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Montreal, Canada
|
I'm really think about 3-ways for the two may speakers, or at least two subs, one per channel. Because stereo bass really is that much better. I'll never use a single sub again...
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PMC TLE1 style sub | Dr.EM | Subwoofers | 102 | 18th September 2009 07:58 PM |
| DNM style | urxle | Chip Amps | 4 | 10th January 2007 07:25 PM |
| Powered Zaphaudio style HiVi B3N speaker using a Chipamp w/ active filters | DaMeat | Full Range | 1 | 14th April 2006 05:34 AM |
| 3 way speaker my style | classe | Multi-Way | 3 | 16th November 2004 05:39 PM |
| Amp PCB traces style | rborer | Solid State | 7 | 24th January 2002 08:49 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08667 seconds (72.69% PHP - 27.31% MySQL) with 10 queries |