|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I am designing the XO for an MTM centre, the woofers have a sensitivity of 88db whilst the tweeter is 91db the woofers are 8ohm and have an Re of 5.7ohm, the tweeter is 6ohm and has an Re of 4.6ohm.
Im using XOsim to work out the figures, because the 2 woofers in parralel will be 91db this matches the tweeter, but the impedance will be lower, do i need to compensate for this? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
bump
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
The two woofers is paralell raise sensistivity by 6dB.
However you need to take baffle step correction into account, this will reduce midrange sensistivity by 6dB. So your tweeter needs to be padded by ~ 3dB. Tried checking out XOsim, can't find it, many crossover sim's are far too simplistic. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
so how do i make a baffle step circuit?
are there any decent calculators online? and also how to i pad the tweeter? |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
speaker, but basically a first order L or L//R in series with the drivers followed by the crossover components. b) I can't find a freeware one as yet, I've been looking. c) R in series and parallel with the tweeter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Its too simplistic.
The important thing is that the crossover is properly designed to take into account the bass units inductance, the tweeters fundamental resonance, any frequency response quirks of the drivers, different sensitivities of the drivers, phase response at crossover including the drivers phase response and offset, baffle step compensation according the baffle width, acoustic summing of the drivers at crossover, and off-axis dispersion issues. You also have twin drivers - which needs to be accounted for. Why I can't find a good freeware simulator. They don't take acoustic issues into account. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
here is the prgram i used so far http://www.geocities.com/f4ier/newxoversim.htm
there are some functions in it that i do not know how to use |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
I've seen this sim before, I'll check it out some more,
but it does not seem to be able to model the MTM configuration acoustically. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mms to Mmd calculations | jaya000 | Multi-Way | 2 | 9th February 2009 07:48 AM |
| driver sensitivity vs system sensitivity | bvan | Full Range | 12 | 5th November 2007 07:57 PM |
| Sensitivity match in a 3-way system? all of equal sensitivity? or bass is 6db more? | rhythmdiy | Multi-Way | 5 | 5th November 2007 11:33 AM |
| Sensitivity dB Calculations | 69stingray | Multi-Way | 4 | 5th July 2007 12:25 AM |
| Need help with calculations please. | Wynand | Solid State | 6 | 27th June 2006 01:00 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10496 seconds (75.92% PHP - 24.08% MySQL) with 10 queries |