Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 8th December 2003, 09:55 PM   #1
Andreas is offline Andreas  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark
Default JBL 2245 open baffle

Hello There !

I have gotten hold of 4 jbl 2245 18 inch drivers. Offcourse these sound supposedly well in a rather large ported enclosure but I was wondering if anyone has tried them on a "plain" open baffle or in a "W" config ?

Cheers
Andreas
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th December 2003, 01:19 AM   #2
BTW is offline BTW
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Singapore
The Qts of the driver is 0.27 so in OB configuration you need to apply quite a bit of EQ to get the bass
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th December 2003, 08:53 PM   #3
navin is offline navin  India
diyAudio Member
 
navin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mumbai (Bombay), India
Send a message via MSN to navin Send a message via Yahoo to navin
leave them in ported enclosures if you could spare the dbs and need a smaller box i'd do a isobaik bass reflex.

i once had a pair of B460s (JBL boxes with the 2245) they were fantastic. then i got married and WAF came into play. enjoy them while you can! :-)
__________________
...still looking for the holy grail.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th December 2003, 11:06 PM   #4
Sjef is offline Sjef  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Amsterdam
I'm using the two JBL 2205 15"woofers in a w-form open baffle. I can imagine that things wood work better with drivers that have a larger x-max but it worked out pretty fine. The 2205's are not designed as a subwoofer driver, but with such a large cone area and a lot of active eq you get lots of pretty tight really deep bass out of them. Can't use them for PA purposes in this configuration but for my room its enough. They still do sound a bit like PA bass though. You have to like that or not.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th December 2003, 11:16 PM   #5
Nielsio is offline Nielsio  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Nielsio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Quote:
"PA bass"
What might this be
__________________
E-MU 0404 . Behringer DEQ2496 . TDA1543 NOS . JLTi tube buffered LM3875 . Supravox 215 Signature Bicone 125L vented
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2003, 06:39 AM   #6
Volenti is offline Volenti  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Quote:
Originally posted by Nielsio


What might this be
nightclub bass, nothing under 40 hz
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2003, 06:54 AM   #7
usekgb is offline usekgb  United States
diyAudio Member
 
usekgb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
I would agree that you should put those 2245's in ported boxes. That is what they were designed for, and that's where they sound their best. One cool thing with these drivers is, they go extremely low in properly tuned boxes. One small drawback though, they need pretty big boxes. I forget the volume, but it is pretty big. They use these things in movie theaters for sub frequencies after all.

Cheers,
Zach
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2003, 09:42 AM   #8
Andreas is offline Andreas  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark
Thanks for for the comments.

I agree that putting the 2245 in ported enclosures of around 250 liters tuned to 25-27 Hz is quite tempting. However my current system consists of jbl 2226 in 200 sealed boxes combined with 2 jbl 2118 and a stageaccompany ribbon. the whole thing is soffit mounted in the wall.
So basicly the 2245 was just something to play with "on the side" and having monster subs around is currently a big WAF no no at my place.

I might give a plain open baffle a try and combine with a focal 8 inch midrange and a philips ribbon i have lying around.

cheers
andreas
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2003, 11:15 AM   #9
Sjef is offline Sjef  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Amsterdam
With PA bass I mean a certain kind of sound character, not that there isn't any output below 40 Hz. Besides most small PA systems don't have any output below 50Hz or so. But 50Hz from a 15 or 18"drivers sound totally different than 40Hz from a 8" driver. There's much more pressure. PA woofers tend to have very thick paper cones with a cetain sound character (hard to describe if you have never heard it) that is different than for exemple the sound character of a relativly thin plastic cone.

Andrea asked if it was possible to use the 2245's in a open baffle configuration, so the answer is yes, try it. But if you want to amplify your own rock and roll band with them than build those big reflex enclosures for them.

The JBL 2205's work quite well in the w-baffle, so it should also be possible with the 2245's. My subs only meausure's 40*40*44 cm outside dimensions and has a resonance frequency of 16 Hz. Without eq they have a 85 dB/w/m output at 20 Hz !!!!!!! and a 105 db/w/m output at 150 Hz. So even with a 20dB eq boost towards 20HZ there's enough headroom for a medium sized listening room.

Most people always refere to PA as a negative thing. Listen to a good modern High End PA system (not the crappy one from the local pub) and you will hear a dynamic range you could only dream of at home.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2003, 11:37 AM   #10
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
I've used the H version in several different configurations. 8 cu ft ported/EQed worked very well. Sealed and EQed also worked well, but it was hard to get the cabinets not to sing. I'm using them currently in a servoed configuration, which carries the same disadvantage, with somewhat less distortion in the bottom octave. When my wood budget permits, I'm sorely tempted to go TL with these. I'll bet that this will be best of all, but I'm interested to hear if anyone else has done this successfully.

Open baffle would not be my first choice for the 2245. The magnet is too strong and the excursion, while good, is not state-of-the-art. A pile of cheap 12 inchers with undersized magnets would seem more suitable.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does open baffle suffer from baffle step? 454Casull Multi-Way 15 19th May 2012 03:12 PM
Open-baffle baffle length matejS Multi-Way 2 21st September 2010 04:49 PM
Murphy baffle radios [ open baffle ] keithpeter Full Range 10 11th September 2007 07:59 PM
what effect does baffle have on open-baffle system? kappa546 Multi-Way 6 24th January 2006 10:21 PM
Australians- what solid timbers for baffle? (open baffle loudspeaker) tktran Multi-Way 13 29th November 2004 11:09 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:50 PM.

Page generated in 0.11510 seconds (76.88% PHP - 23.12% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio