Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th December 2003, 04:04 AM   #1
ChemMan is offline ChemMan  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Jersey
Cool would like some input on a setup

This is my first time putting together my very own speaker system, so I'd like to hear some thoughts on what I've come up with so far. The point of this project is to replace my crappy old pc multimedia speakers with an inexpensive two way system in a small sealed enclosure. Here is what I've got so far:

Woofer:
Dayton 6 1/2 inch shielded

tweeter:
TANG BAND 28-847SA SHIELDED NEODYMIUM DOME TWEETER


Placed in a sealed enclosure 0.167 ft^3 (4.7 L). The box has a Qtc of 0.76. All of these calculations were made using WinISD.

The crossover I was planning on constructing was a fourth-order Linkwitz-Riley with the crossover point at 2500 Hz, and a zobel network on the woofer. I decided to go with a fourth order crossover to avoid pushing the tweeter too hard in the lower frequencies, even though the crossover will be bulky and somewhat expensive to make($20 for each channel).

My questions are:
1. Does anyone have any experience with these two drivers?
2. Am I going overkill with the crossover? Would a second or third order crossover be more appropriate?
3. Are metallized polypropylene crossover caps worth the extra cost over electrolytic capacitors? Do they sound significantly better or show better performance? (I suppose this is more of an opinion question)
4. Will the inductors cause problems with my monitor? The speakers will be right up against it, hence the shielded speakers.


Thanks for all the input.

ChemMan
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th December 2003, 10:26 PM   #2
ChemMan is offline ChemMan  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Jersey
So no one sees any problems worth commenting about? Great.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th December 2003, 11:01 AM   #3
just another
diyAudio Moderator
 
wintermute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney
Blog Entries: 22
Hi ChemMan,

I looked at the freq response curves of the drivers you are talking about last night and almost posted but figured I'm not that experienced with things like this and someone else would probably say something more meaningful......

I wasn't that wrapped with the response curves, but since this is a cheap project to as you say "replace your crappy computer speakers", I guess that they won't be too bad.

I haven't yet ventured into crossover design, but looking at the repsonse curves of the two speakers my gut feel would be that maybe you should consider a xover at 1.5Khz rather than 2.5Khz (I think with a 600Hz resonant freq the tweeter should handle that), I'm assuming that these speakers won't be being thrashed with high wattage

Jump in and say this is a really bad idea everyone out there with more experience than me if I'm giving a bum steer here!!!!!!

The reason I'm suggesting the above is that the mid/bass dips pretty badly just after about 1.5K but has a peak at about 2.8K whereas the tweeter has a dip at about 2K. I'm guessing that the peaks at the end of the mid/bass' response may actually flatten out the dips in the tweeters response if you move the crossover point down. All wild speculation, but maybe has some merit I'm assuming you were considering a 4th order xo because of the peaks in the mid/bass units response.

I think the only other thing I can give input on is that I believe there have been studies done that show that electrolitics do actually introduce distortion, I believe this is quite measurable, but I could be wrong, this is of course heresay on my part as I don't have any references to back it up!

Regards,

Tony.
__________________
Any intelligence I may appear to have is purely artificial!
Some of my photos
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th December 2003, 01:53 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
swirv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Carolina
Send a message via AIM to swirv
Do not use electrolitics in your crossover. Get the better caps. I would also recomend going with a 2nd order crossover if you choose 2500Hz. This should save you some $$$ on the crossover. The 28-847 should be fine. I crossed mine with a 1st order @6500Hz.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th December 2003, 05:14 PM   #5
ChemMan is offline ChemMan  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Jersey
Great, thanks for the comments.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Input on 5.1 diy setup, budget friendly *n00b* Blazin_Jason Multi-Way 18 20th January 2009 09:32 PM
Input transformer: floating input = distortion ErikdeBest Tubes / Valves 13 20th January 2009 09:36 AM
HELP: BJT input op-amp's input bias current compensation frickecello Solid State 6 19th June 2007 12:00 AM
Adding a third input to a differential input stage? maudio Solid State 15 11th October 2006 02:16 AM
current bias j-fet input 2sk170 ,2sj74 at input stage YUTK Solid State 11 2nd June 2005 03:34 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:49 PM.

Page generated in 0.09857 seconds (76.89% PHP - 23.11% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio