Feedback on drivers for 3-way bookshelf - Page 9 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th June 2013, 04:31 AM   #81
jReave is offline jReave  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Doh, I meant "isn't exactly perfect". sigh
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2013, 06:41 AM   #82
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by jReave View Post
Ok, that was good. That made me chuckle.

Too bad the sound of the moving motorcycle is going to be subject to the Doppler effect and so the tone will be changing, so (just for this example) if the timber of the front soundstage is exactly perfect it probably won't matter.
So then -

MOTORCYCLE - Motorcycle - motorcycle ?



Steve
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2013, 08:47 PM   #83
jReave is offline jReave  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by rick240 View Post
But aren't you also apt to cross to the tweeter lower in a 2-way than a 3-way (say 2kHz instead of 3kHz)? So that band would definitely not timbre match. You could always just cross them all at the best point for the woofer in the 2-way, but that is not likely to be using mid or tweeter best in the 3-way.
Xo points should definitely be different but think of timber in terms of both frequency response (FR) and harmonic distortion.

The FR is the summed response of all drivers that are being used in the speaker. 3dB is considered the minimum change in SPL that the average person can perceive as louder/quieter (actually, this depends on the person and what frequency weíre talking about but thatís a whole other discussion). That means that 2 different FRís that are within plus or minus 3dB of each other are likely to be perceived as about the same and thatís regardless of where the xo point is or if it's a 2-way or 3-way etc. That can be difficult to achieve but itís not unreasonable for a good xo designer.

However, even if 2 different speakers have the exact same FR, they are still unlikely to sound exactly the same unless they use the exact same drivers and xoís and thatís because different types of cone materials all have slightly different resonant/damping characteristics. Think of it this way. A guitar, violin or piano can all play the exact same note but each one will sound totally different because each one has a different harmonic profile or timber. Each instrument plays the fundamental note but also includes higher and lower octaves, 3rd's, 5th's and so forth. Same thing for drivers. Each one has its own sonic signature. Feed the driver a pure tone as the fundamental, and the driver will reproduce that as well as a handful of other tones as well. Thatís harmonic distortion.

Another graph below. Instead of showing the distortion profile across the whole frequency spectrum, this one just shows what happens with a single frequency. If the driver could reproduce that tone perfectly, then youíd only see a single, narrow spike at the fundamental, 150Hz. Donít ask me why, but when a signal is input into a driver, it also reproduces that tone by factors of 2, 3, 4, 5 and so on, usually with diminishing SPL. So as well as 150Hz (this is incorrect but letís just call the note an E), you can see the 2nd spike at 300Hz (E again, an octave higher Ė so not unpleasant), the next oneís at 450Hz (somewhere around A sharp which is kind of dissonant), another at 600Hz (the next octave Ė so again benign) and the next at 750Hz (again A sharp Ė dissonant). (As an aside, if you want to know what that sounds like leave it to Rush to put E, A sharp and E together for an effective dissonant chord structure in this song at about 34 seconds in. Rush - Secret Touch (Restored Version) - Dynamic Range 11 - YouTube)

So in order, those are the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th order harmonic distortion responses of that driver when trying to reproduce a pure 150Hz tone. The same thing occurs with every note right across the full frequency range but each with differing SPL levels which is what you see in the other distortion graphs weíve been presenting. So, whatís going to be the threshold for a noticeable difference here? Again the same +/- 3dB for each type of distortion, but as I say, this is still not as important as matching the FRís. Look at the SPL levels of the distortion responses Ė anywhere from 30 to 60 dB quieter than the fundamental.

There are actually a few more factors that shape the speakerís timber but for our purposes I think I can stop there.

So, best case scenario for timber matching: 5 identical speakers.
Next best: 3-ways all the way around with the same drivers. CC gets the best room dispersion because of WT/MW configuration. FR and distortion shouldnít be significantly different.
Third best: 2-way mains and 3-way CC with same type of drivers but in different sizes. FR may be within +/- 3dB and timber is going to be close because of the similar motors and cone materials but itís still going to be a little different due to differences in harmonic distortion. Very noticeable? Not too likely.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rick240 View Post
But assuming xo and timbre matching is fine, would a Revelator W18 be better at 80 - 2.5kHz (or whatever xo point is) than a Seas L18 at 80-500/600 and the Audax covering higher? Won't the 1kHz - 2.5kHz signals be cleaner when the driver isn't also responsible for the higher power 80 - 500Hz range?
Thatís the question isnít it? If you use a higher quality driver as a mid/woofer or use 2 lesser quality drivers for the same range, which is better. Yes, thereíll probably be less intermodulaton distortion in the mid when used in a 3-way but does that mean the 3-way will be better? Depends of course on the drivers. And on how loud you want to play them. And others would say that youíre better off without the extra xo in there. For the money youíre spending and the SQ you are interested in, my thinking is that you should try to stay in the upper echelon of drivers. If the difference in SQ is high enough, the 2-way is probably going to trump the 3-way but if SPL is a top priority then the 3-way probably is the way to go. It would be great if someone whoís heard them could compare the Audax with other drivers like perhaps the Scan Discovery 10F which is also a great little driver. Or lower your box size priority a little and go with this planar driver, the B&G Neo8S, outstandingly clean planar driver DIY Speaker Components | Replacement Speakers | and Speaker kits from Meniscus Audio Group.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rick240 View Post
Actually the Q100 is the 5 1/4 UniQ, similar to my iQ1 rears. The Q300 is the 6 1/2 like the iQ3.
Darn.

I still think those 4 targets I set are a pretty good benchmark of comparison for you. 2nd graph below is for the L18 and hopefully you can see that it falls short.
Attached Images
File Type: gif M8a nonlinear 150 hz 94dB pt25m.GIF (15.9 KB, 33 views)
File Type: gif L18-HD.gif (26.7 KB, 30 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2013, 05:39 PM   #84
jReave is offline jReave  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Hey Rick, hope you are staying high and dry. Looks like some pretty wicked flooding your neck of the woods.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How the negative feedback really works and an alternative feedback question Amit_112dB Solid State 37 21st April 2014 03:16 PM
Modify amp from voltage to current feedback for low Qts drivers nicotin78 Solid State 13 22nd March 2013 12:28 PM
Feedback on wholesale drivers Thims Swap Meet 9 14th May 2008 10:17 PM
'Local Feedback and Nonlinearity of Multistage Feedback Amplifiers' mikeks Solid State 62 20th July 2005 08:03 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:01 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2