Focal Newform Utopia - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th April 2013, 01:32 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Default Focal Newform Utopia

So I am setting off to design and build a three way speaker. The drivers are as follows:

Focal Audiom 6wm
Focal 13w8711

Newform Research R30

The system will use an active crossover. Amplifiers for each speaker.

Ribbon amp: Blue Circle BC2 monoblocks (biased down to 20w so they don't catch on fire again! hopefully!)
Audio quest CV-4 speaker cable, audioquest viper interconnect

Midrange amp: Mark Levinson ML-11 (and I will try an anthem integrated 1 and compare)
Audioquest Type 4 speaker cable, audio quest viper interconnect.

Bass Amp: Mark Levinson ML-9
Audioquest Bedrock or Slate speaker cable, audioquest viper interconnect.

Active Crossover is Behringer dcx2496
REW will be employed with Behringer DEQ2496
Some room Correction with a home made quadratic diffusor. And some absorption will be implented along the way.

I am reading Vance Dickason's Loudspeaker Design Cook Book. I am also running simulations for boxes from WinISD Pro Alpha.

I figure we will start with the woofer. I know this integration has been done before between 13w8711 and audiom 6wm.

Recommended box volume for from Focal is as follows:

80 to 120L box, with Fb 33, and Fb33.6 respectively. It also says superb bass definition from 60 to 70L vented applications. What does this mean? Why are they mentioning it? Is it better transient response from the smaller box? Whats the meaning of superb bass definition?

After running the simulations the response from a box 60L is not desirable.

Looking at the WinISD graphs I am leaning towards the 120 L box because it gives the lowest response, and the dip in the curve is only one dB so I presume can easily be equalized later along with the other dips and peaks due to the room.

In Vance's book he uses the upper cutoff of a speaker to be the -6dB point in the off axis measurement of frequency response. Referring to the graph it appears that the woofer drops about 5db (on and off axis measurements are within 1 dB agreement) between 100Hz and 200Hz, and the spl is constant within a dB from 200hz untill 700Hz. From here there is a dramatic rise and then a sharp rolloff. I imagine the peak above 700HZ can be filtered out in the DCX2496 by doing a response plot with the microphone (Behringer ecm8000) and applying the filter using REW and the DCX.

So the off axis response of the woofer doesn't fall off by 6dB untill we get into the 1050HZ region as far as I can tell. So it appears from this that I can cross over the midrange to the woofer anywhere in the range below 1000Hz with active corrective filtering, or anywhere below 600hz without any active correction.

The lower cutoff for the midrange is determined by the fundamental frequency or the resonant frequency of the midrange. In Vance's book he states that it has to be minimum 2 times the fundamental frequency. The Audiom 6wm has Fs of 116.9Hz. So minimum of 233.8Hz, and its better if its 3 x Fs. Which would give us 350.7Hz. This establishes my lower limit.

So the woofer and Midrange will be crossed over between 350 ,and 600hz, and I imagine the lower I do it The better transient response I will get. At this point I will be varying the xover frequency 20hz at a time, taking notes, and listening to the same music over and over. Something live and acoustic, and it will probably be Eric Clapton Unplugged listening for the ratio of attack and decay (harmonic ringing that lingers after the guitar string is plucked), and also that full body balance, vs too lean sound. I will also graph SPL response. For the xover points of interest and keep them with my subjective notes.

As for the Audiom 6wm enclosure from what I understand the bigger the better beyond a size that will limit the low frequency response at our x over point. I have purchased sonotubes and mounted the drivers to MDF with a flooring adhesive called no more nails. I am considering overlaying another sonotube and filling the space between with either sand, or concrete, but this will be done after the speaker is complete.

I will consider the integration between the ribbon and the midrange in subsequent posts, but for now I wanted to get the general idea laid out for the bottom end.

I have a few questions.

In WinISD Pro Alpha the software determines box volumes based on a driver you select. Does it account for the volume of the speaker itself? Or do I have to subtract this from the given box volume?

What filter slopes have people tried with this driver combination in the past?

Knowing that I am going to use an active setup with the ability to filter the woofer, can I succesfully lower the response of the box a bit and correct for the rolloff? If so by how much?

I will be posting the Graphs I described shortly. I will also be doing the calculations by hand to compare with the software.

Any input appreciated. I will be posting more details , I just wanted to get the general idea out there for some input before I go any further.


Last edited by klhsx; 28th April 2013 at 01:53 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2013, 02:08 PM   #2
DEQXter is offline DEQXter  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: ABQ, NM
Send a message via Yahoo to DEQXter
Just another noob so cannot comment thoughtfully on some of the issues--actually owned some of the Newform speakers a dozen or so years ago--believe they were mated with a pair of very nice Scan Speak woofers per channel crossed over about 1.8kHz. Liked the sound quite a bit but do remember that they were somewhat less forgiving in terms of listening distance than a conventional cone/dome configuration. Ultimately the aesthetics of the column cabs and big stick led me elsewhere--to an even bigger stick in my case--the B&G 75" magnetoplanar drivers. Now back to doing a studio monitor sized project using Heil tweeters.

What I wanted to say is I would also not hesitate to call or e-mail the owner of Newform for advice if you have not already done so--the man provides world class customer service IME and those of many others. Anyhow best of luck and will be following your project with great interest.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2013, 11:57 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Ok so I have decided to go with the 120L box, and from there I can experiment with different port tuning.

I will be trying out the Equalized Semi Sealed approach with the 2nd order rolloff corrected. I will compare this with the traditional ported tuning with the 3db shelf, and 6db shelf. Both can be accomplished from the same box volume as far as I can tell. The port tuning changes things enough to try both approaches.

The only other question I have is: does WinISD pro alpha give box volumes which account for the volume of the woofer itself? Or do I have to add this to the volume value they give me when calculating my box dimensions?
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2013, 03:38 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
I am currently trying the configuration with the Focal 6WM, and the scan speak 8935 Carbon fiber woofer.

I have the three way sounding very sweet, and very transparent with the following slopes.

6db/octave at 1.82 kHz high pass on the newform R630.

12/octave butterworth on the 6wm. With some EQ to the individual drivers applied.

The scan speak woofer and the mid are crossed at 345hz, 12db/octave Butterworth on the mid, and linkwitz on the woofer. Sounds very good so far. Minor tweaks are really changing the character now.

Excited. This may turn into a 4 way speaker? .....
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2013, 10:27 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
Inductor's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cascais
Simulation software only gives internal volume. You have to enter all internals like ports volume and drivers volume and wood thickness for added inside parts. WinISD has the volume of driver in his last menu if not in factory specs.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2013, 11:55 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Thanks! I assumed as much, I just wasn't sure as Win ISD does know which driver I am using I thought it was a 50 / 50 shot that it would subtract the speaker volume for me.

Thanks for Clarifying!

On a side note. I am finding that the Anthem amp on the midrange driver give a lot of extra sweetness and warmth without changing dynamics much at all.

Quite unexpected to hear a midrange driver in the range of 345hz to 1.21khz make such a difference by changing the amp from transistor to tube.

I think this is magical combination. I may even re wire the anthem to triode mode and see how that works, if I loose any dynamics or not.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2013, 01:44 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Update, new crossover points refined!

I have crossed the scan speak 8535 with a low pass of 384hz 24db/octave, and the focal audiom at 440hz with a 18db/octave filter, sounds a lot better than it did!

I guess with such good drivers even when its not perfect it already sounds really good. Because with these small changes its massive improvements on what already sounds good.

I can tell I'm getting closer to the ideal xover point when each small change causes such a dramatic difference in character.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2013, 01:52 AM   #8
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
I am trying to fine tune the crossover with measurements from REW, there is an arithmetic plot, explained in the help menu, it should be under overlays, there should be a button that says arithmetic but its not there in mine, anyone have any idea?
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2013, 04:48 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
I reset all the setting on both units as things were all over the place, starting over with the xover! Man this is harder than it seems at first.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2013, 03:38 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
some updates on the xover process.

In trying to calculate the ideal xover point and considering the recommendations from the founder of the newform research speaker company, I came to a few strange conclusions.

I initially thought that picking the frequency would work best by selecting the same xover point for the high and low pass .

From the definition these are the -xdb down points, so if the drivers are relatively flat in that area they should sum to the reference listening level again.

well the drivers are not relatively flat in the xover region, they are all over the place. So you end up taking a slop which combines with the natural roll off of the driver to produce a new slope. There is no calculating this really, you have to just try all the slopes, and all the points, and move around in frequency and slightly adjust the level of each driver and make notes.

That being said, I have had great success in doing it this way. I now have something which sounds like a high end system. The main criteria I am basing my success on is 3 dimensional soundstage.

You can get an even frequency response from many xover arrangements regardless of phase relationships between drivers. The gross misalignment in this aspect is very apparent. You can set the slopes, and points and levels by trial and error,

But you cannot get 3d imaging, by playing with these alone. Not really at all, because in the drivers are out of phase with eachother, there will be peaks and dips. But they wont affect the tone balance in a gross way. They will affect it in a subtle way. It wont sound like a tone imbalance, it will sound like fuzziness, lack of snap, and no 3d imaging.

So having said all this, here is the procedure I have followed to get very 3d imaging, and very refined mating of the drivers.

No EQ to any of the individual LMH bands. Tried this with real close up measurements and it didn’t sound good.

First measure the entire output on REW and try to center the average of the responses between low mid and high.

Set the low and high pass points of the drivers to be at such a point that you get a desired slope near their roll off. For example on the ribbon I set the lowe pass to 6db/8ve and set it at 1.82 so that by 900hz it is down 6db, but it already has substantial rolloff so that I am down 12 by about 1.2

The midrange I set around 1.2khz with 12db/8ve, then I move the points on one driver up and down and note if it sounds thicker, or thinner, and when its too thick or too thin I go back the other way. I take my time doing this, maybe a few days or a week at this stage, starting all over again a few times in a very different region and always listening fresh and not for extended periods of time.

Now the transient response of each driver successively gets worse as we go from ribbon , to mid, to woofer, so it would make sense that the upper frequency components be squeezed out drop by drop from the faster driver in the xover region. So we want the overall rolloff of the faster driver to be a bit less than the one below it. So we hear a bit more of that driver than the precedeing driver.

The same principle for the next coupling of mid and woofer. And I came up with the following.

So far it sounds great, and I have not even refined it as far as it can go yet.

|Heres the process

Make small 0.2db increment changes up and down , don’t rush, listen to three songs with each change, on each driver, live with it for a day maybe, record settings.

Run the long and short delay correction on the DCX 2496.

Turn the short delays on in the xover setting for each band.

Adjust the time in ms back and for individually by a few turns of the knob, three or four turns max in either direction or +-0.03 ms.

Listen for quick precusion hits, and listen for transient, and steady state separation on the guitar chords.

Now adjust the polarities for fine adjustment.
First try inverting, non inverting, then try 90deg in both, then 45 in both.
Listen to the voice, and listen to high hats, when the voice sounds full, with no grain, the xover position is close. When the high hats have sharp loud attack the phase is correct.

Then the following arrangement of amplifiers and speakers.

Newform R30 ribbon + Blue circle BC2’s

284mm or 0.83 ms
phase inverted 90 deg
DCX Gain +15db
High Pass none
Low Pass butterworth 6 db/8ve1.82 khz

Focal Audiom 6wm + Anthem int 1 (volume knob set to 12 o clock)

Short delay112 mm or 0.33ms
Inverted 145deg
DCX Gain -5db
High Pass 345 butterworth 12
Low Pass Bessel 12db/8ve at 1.21khz

Scan speak 8935 + Yamaha (+16db, not sure if this even has effect with mc input)

Short delay 124mm or 0.36ms
Phase normal 90 deg
DCX Gain -7db
High Pass 20hz butterworth 24
Low Pass butterworth 18db/8ve 243hz

  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dynaudio Esotar vs Focal Utopia - Building Best System Possible!! jrhunkler Car Audio 6 18th October 2013 10:21 PM
Focal Utopia Be active power handling matyj Car Audio 3 5th December 2012 05:54 AM
Good upgrade from FOcal Utopia tn52 tweeters silver00spike Car Audio 10 3rd November 2009 10:04 PM
Recessing driver into baffle like focal utopia be discl Multi-Way 3 13th March 2008 05:03 AM
similar to Focal Utopia shaunly Multi-Way 2 1st November 2005 05:07 AM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:46 PM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2