New study on loudspeaker placement - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th March 2013, 02:00 PM   #1
gedlee is offline gedlee  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
Default New study on loudspeaker placement

Hi All

Some months ago I received a chart from a friend that showed a rough analysis of toe-in with Constant Directivity (CD) loudspeakers showing how this could be used to improve the stereo imaging at a wider array of seating locations. I found this chart interesting and it motivated me to do something that I have thought about for awhile.

I have written a simulation of the sound field in front of a pair of loudspeakers that can be placed at various locations and toed-in at various angles. The software works, but is still a little rough. My intent is to post this software to my web site so that others can "play" with it. It uses the database of polar responses that are available on my web site - in other words it uses real measured data and not simulated frequency response and polar response.

Thus far the software is enlightening, but several questions have come to mind. First, what is the easiest way to post screen captures of the running software? It would take a lot of captures to highlight a "story" about how and why toe-in and CD works so well.

The software simulation is very simplistic, as all good starts have to be. There are no room reflections, for now, this is easily added later. Its also non-modal so it makes no sense to display < 200 Hz. There will only ever be a first and maybe second sidewall reflection as beyond this is just getting too complicated. The left and right ear signals are assumed to be unconnected, i.e. there is no cross-talk between the speaker signals and the ear signals. This is also why it makes no sense to consider multiple reflections as this assumption is far too limiting for any detailed analysis.

I have programed Fig. 3.5 from Blauert which describes the phantom source location as a function of the delay difference and the level difference at the two ears. The software uses this figure to map the "image" in the room for the particular speaker and its setup. The "image" is defined as a metric from zero (image completely pulled to one speaker) to one (image completely central). I have found that this map is extremely instructive.

The listener can be placed at various locations around the room and the specific frequency response at the two ears is shown on a plot at the bottom. This is also very enlightening because it shows that even though the image may be central in many cases, it is also very colored because of the speakers polar response. Getting good imaging with uncolored (neutral)sound is pretty difficult and very few of the speakers in my database can achieve it.

I would also like to map out the "coloration", but I am at a loss as to how to do that. Basically each point in the room can have four variables - Red, Green, Blue and Alpha (alpha is the transparency or intensity of the color). How does one "map" a frequency response - some 100 variables - into four variables? I had thought of using each base color (RGB) to show the level in each of three bands, i.e. a perfectly flat signal would then be white. But a highly colored sound could still be shown as white if the average within each band were the same. Then I thought about using the Standard deviation within each band to set the color, but this then ignores level differences between the bands. What about a single color to show the mean slope of the frequency response with the alpha channel to show the standard deviation - a bright color is colored and the color signifies "bright" (more HFs) or "dull" (more lows). there are lots of possibilities but none seems to be ideal.

Any ideas?
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2013, 02:09 PM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Switzerland
Sounds interesting. Results will be free field only? Not sure I understand what "left and right ear signals are assumed to be unconnected" means?
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2013, 02:36 PM   #3
markusA is offline markusA  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
markusA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Gothenburg
Blog Entries: 1
Check out MJK's matchcad worksheets for ideas if you haven't allready done this.
No fancy 3D but it does have a fairly clean interface to handle room interaction and listening position.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2013, 02:51 PM   #4
gedlee is offline gedlee  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by markus76 View Post
Sounds interesting. Results will be free field only? Not sure I understand what "left and right ear signals are assumed to be unconnected" means?
The right speaker feeds the right ear only and the left speaker feeds the left ear only. There is no head diffraction model. That is not impossible of course and I've actually done that before, but the calculations are extensive and would inhibit the real-time aspect of the map updates.

They are "free field" for now. I will later add a few side wall reflections but I still need to figure out how to show the effect of those on a "map".
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2013, 02:54 PM   #5
gedlee is offline gedlee  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by markusA View Post
Check out MJK's matchcad worksheets for ideas if you haven't allready done this.
No fancy 3D but it does have a fairly clean interface to handle room interaction and listening position.
I have no idea where to find those. Does his program use real data or "assumed" directivities? If the directivity is assumed then I would not be too interested because I know all too well how accurate those models are (not).
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2013, 02:56 PM   #6
gedlee is offline gedlee  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
I would post screen shots if I knew how to do that simply. Any ideas? "Insert image" is pretty limiting in file size right?
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2013, 03:03 PM   #7
markusA is offline markusA  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
markusA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Gothenburg
Blog Entries: 1
I can't give you anything about details but he does all the programming himself and he seems like a pretty openminded guy and would probably enjoy the discussion if you tracked him down.

quarter-wave.com is his site.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2013, 03:07 PM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Switzerland
Quote:
Originally Posted by gedlee View Post
I would post screen shots if I knew how to do that simply. Any ideas? "Insert image" is pretty limiting in file size right?
How large are the screenshots in pixels? Resize them, save as JPGs and add them as an attachment to your post.
You can link those attached files in your post by clicking on the "Insert Image" button:

Click the image to open in full size.
Attached Images
File Type: png Screen Shot 2013-03-07 at 17.06.06.png (53.3 KB, 1936 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2013, 03:22 PM   #9
Elias is offline Elias  Finland
diyAudio Member
 
Elias's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where you live
Quote:
Originally Posted by gedlee View Post
I have programed Fig. 3.5 from Blauert which describes the phantom source location as a function of the delay difference and the level difference at the two ears.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gedlee View Post
The right speaker feeds the right ear only and the left speaker feeds the left ear only. There is no head diffraction model.

Without a proper head diffraction model all this is pretty useless and would produce nothing much but a bunch of "pretty pictures".
__________________
Liberate yourself from the illusion of two speaker stereo triangle
Dipole Bass vs Monopole Bass Stereophonic Sound from a Single Loudspeaker 3 Speaker Linear Stereo Matrix Wavelets
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2013, 03:52 PM   #10
gedlee is offline gedlee  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
Then please don't come back.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SU551-RS28F a 2-way DEQX system loudspeaker measurement study gornir Multi-Way 49 11th February 2013 10:45 PM
Feasibility study 454Casull Multi-Way 10 22nd March 2009 12:23 AM
I want to study NoBit Digital Source 3 12th January 2008 02:35 PM
Loudspeaker placement djdan Multi-Way 2 25th January 2003 04:03 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:02 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2