Why Not Ferrofluid In PA Woofers? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st March 2013, 02:42 AM   #1
Wizard of Kelts
diyAudio Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, The Nutmeg State
Default Why Not Ferrofluid In PA Woofers?

With the emphasis on SPL per box size that PA speakers have, it seems a natural. When amplified equipment first appeared many years ago, watts were expensive and voice coils couldn't handle that many anyway. So the PA boxes had to be large and comparatively sensitive.

Now, with greater emphasis on SPL and bass, and watts comparatively cheaper to buy, why don't PA 12s and 15s have ferrofluid to cool them? You get more SPL or more bass extension without having to enlarge the boxes you're lugging around if you have ferrofluid cooling the voice coil.

The major objection to ferrofluid is that some think it doesn't sound right on expensive home equipment, but in PA you're not that worried about subtle difference.

It would make sense for all or most PA speakers to have ferrofluid, but they don't. Anyone know why?
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body."
-Anonymous
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2013, 03:00 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dallas
Contrary solution to vent hole. Which one is better for cooling?
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2013, 03:27 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Western Sydney
Any drawbacks to using ferrofluid in a low-excursion woofer?
http://www.audiogroupforum.com/csfor...hp?t-3423.html
http://www.ferrotec.com/products/fer...o/audioSelect/
this might have something useful:
http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=3928
__________________
Impedance varies with frequency, use impedance plots of your drivers and make crossover calculations using the actual impedance of the driver at the crossover frequency

Last edited by PeteMcK; 1st March 2013 at 03:32 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2013, 03:57 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Kindhornman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Los Angeles, California
Kelticwizard,
There are PA speakers that use Ferro Fluids, but you have to remember that in-order to use it correctly the drivers need to be designed with the fluid in mind. Proper gap design and venting is important to keeping the fluid where you want it to be. Just putting fluid into a driver that was not optimized for ferro fluid can be a waste of time. It is very easy to hydraulically push the fluid out of the gap, without venting below the fluid this is what will happen, the fluid will be pumped out and end up above or below the gap and then it loses all effect. There are many different viscosity's available and this must be balanced with the design and intended frequency response required. This is the simple answer to your question.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2013, 04:33 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Default Changes

When selecting a ferro-fluid, the optimum values of viscosity and saturation magnetization for a particular transducer design must be determined. However, the quantity of fluid to be dispensed into the magnetic air gap in some ways may be the most critical value; since variations in ferro-fluid quantity influence thermal power handling, the impedance curve, and frequency response characteristics of a loudspeaker.

Over time, all these values will certainly change, due the effects of heat and the tearing action of large and quick voice-coil excursions occurring in the confined space of a magnetic gap. (The Silly Putty phenomenon is at work here). Given the high duty-cycles imposed on drivers used in P.A. venues, the use of ferro-fluids would seem to be contraindicated due to the accelerated fluid deterioration that may be expected.

Regards,

WHG
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2013, 08:39 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Brett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
You could get even better performance and longer life from drivers by designing or modifying them to have a heatsinking system that passively or actively removes waste driver heat to the outside of the box.

A passive approach was detailed by Wayne Parnham years ago, here and with more links here.

Bossobass also did active (fan driven) cooling of HT subs in his Raven.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2013, 05:22 AM   #7
Wizard of Kelts
diyAudio Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, The Nutmeg State
Well, I haven't had time to thoroughly read and digest all of the links and information here yet, (I'm slow that way), but I would just like to say how delighted I am with the wealth of info the posters have given here.

For instance, I now know that one reason few woofers have ferrofluid is that high excursion tends to throw the fluid out of the gap unless parts are machined to prevent this. I would love see the machining changes that prevent this, if anyone knows.

I did not know that viscosity and other parameters of the fluid would change more with high excursion drivers, therefore changing the parameters of the drivers themselves.

Finally, the idea of a heat sink for the pole piece is one that I thought of before, even looked up the thermal conductivity of permalloy, which is excellent, beforehand. But it is good to know that someone has already done it and to see how.

If anyone knows where I can find out about the machining changes to keep the fluid in, I would be grateful. But the heat sink idea looks like something a DIYer can do if he plans it out. Unless I am mistaken, I think there are some piezo driven fans that used to be available in the aftermarket for the old MacIntoshes way back when-as I recall the hotter they got the more power the fan put out, not that it was much.

I'll see if I can across something similar to those old piezo fans.

Much thanks for the links and info.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body."
-Anonymous
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2013, 05:59 AM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: wigan
Hi keltic ..
Maybe instead of a liquid an inert gas could be used to more efficiently get the heat from the voice coil to the magnet structure.. Another thought , Insted of a heatsink attached to the magnet structure how about some form of liquid cooling with an external radiator and fan. Many years ago at a proffesional audio show there was a bass horn using a large servo motor to drive the cone this they claimed virtually eliminated power / thermal compresion . The speaker was built by a company called Comunity loudspeakers..

Best Regards Mark

Ps the said speaker was good to around 200 Hz... And finally aluminium alloy coned drivers maybe would help getting rid of some heat directly from the voice coil. as long as the coil former was constructed from a good heat conducting material that is ..

Last edited by madtecchy; 5th March 2013 at 06:05 AM. Reason: added Ps
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2013, 06:55 AM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Kindhornman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Los Angeles, California
A couple of points here. One is that it is next to impossible to modify a speaker after the fact to work well with ferrofluids. The problem becomes that you need to drill holes at the least to vent the magnetic assembly below the voicecoil and the magnet being charged would hold any metal chips in place and have fun getting them out of a charged magnetic circuit. The changes are really simple in that the basic structure can stay the same but you want a vent below the gap so that there is not a closed chamber below the voicecoil, much like a vented pole piece vents the air behind the dust cap. Another way to cool a magnetic circuit that is often over looked would be to add a heat pipe to the assembly, again hard to do with a magnetized speaker but it could be added to a vented pole piece. Heat pipes transfer heat from one place to another like air through a closed fluid in a sealed tube. Look up heat pipe or heat transfer pipe and you will see what I am talking about.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2013, 09:10 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: wigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kindhornman View Post
A couple of points here. One is that it is next to impossible to modify a speaker after the fact to work well with ferrofluids. The problem becomes that you need to drill holes at the least to vent the magnetic assembly below the voicecoil and the magnet being charged would hold any metal chips in place and have fun getting them out of a charged magnetic circuit. The changes are really simple in that the basic structure can stay the same but you want a vent below the gap so that there is not a closed chamber below the voicecoil, much like a vented pole piece vents the air behind the dust cap. Another way to cool a magnetic circuit that is often over looked would be to add a heat pipe to the assembly, again hard to do with a magnetized speaker but it could be added to a vented pole piece. Heat pipes transfer heat from one place to another like air through a closed fluid in a sealed tube. Look up heat pipe or heat transfer pipe and you will see what I am talking about.
Liquid cooling.. just what i said
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Use for Ferrofluid? sdclc126 Multi-Way 4 20th December 2012 01:02 AM
Reasonably priced 15" PA woofers in Canada? Cal Weldon Multi-Way 11 2nd January 2007 08:41 PM
dayton 10" classic woofers for PA... nerd of nerds Multi-Way 13 29th May 2006 02:24 AM
Ciare Nd-magnet PA woofers for sealed box home subwoofer? capslock Subwoofers 1 22nd September 2002 01:23 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:45 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2