|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#41 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
On the other hand I'd want to specify the system first and decide whether it needs a crossover, then find drivers that will fit.
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Western Sydney
|
re: "Isn't exactly the opposite what you should be doing since the crossover points are mostly determined by the limitations of the chosen drivers? " -
if the crossover is implemented properly, it doesn't matter where the xover freq is, anything else is mere shadow chasing
__________________
Impedance varies with frequency, use impedance plots of your drivers and make crossover calculations using the actual impedance of the driver at the crossover frequency |
|
|
|
#43 |
|
just another
diyAudio Moderator
|
Ah I'm glad I wasn't the only one thinking the above (ie if it is implemented properly it shouldn't matter)
Thanks PeteMcK... I guess I didn't have the confidence to say it Of course some thought does still need to be put into the driver selection if you want to be able to actually achieve this, so you are thinking along the correct lines markusA but, I think you should be less focused on some theoretical best point, and more look at a range of possible points(for the particular design goals), and once the drivers have been chosen look at what works best for those drivers. Choosing a crossover point based on what's best for the drivers chosen and implementing it very well, I would think will be more likely to sound better than choosing a crossover point based on some arbitrary design goals that may not in reality result in an ideal crossover with the chosen drivers. Unfortunately until you actually have the drivers and have taken measurements on your actual baffle you won't be able to tell. Tony. |
|
|
|
#44 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Willamette Valley
|
How is crossover freq not part of proper implementation?
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Drivers 1st?
XO point 1st? It is an iterative process, the 2 are far from independent. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Dilletante, tinkerer and beggathoner supreme
diyAudio Member
|
Heck? Everything is connected to everything else
Room size first? Cost second? Find drivers that best fit criteria 1 & 2 then decide XO? It gets so that sometimes I feel like throwing darts at a target
__________________
QUOTE" The more I know, the more I know, I know (insert maniacal laugh >here<) NOTHING" |
|
|
|
#47 |
|
just another
diyAudio Moderator
|
I think that in reality moondog, that there is an element of that any time a new pairing of drivers is tried
Obviously as ones experience grows it should be possible to get a better aim but I suspect that there will always be some drivers that will inherently be a better match than others, and finding them will be part of the art. Tony. |
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Dilletante, tinkerer and beggathoner supreme
diyAudio Member
|
OK My ability to throw darts gets better with experience but the target gets smaller at the same time
__________________
QUOTE" The more I know, the more I know, I know (insert maniacal laugh >here<) NOTHING" |
|
|
|
#49 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
|
Quote:
I might have a bone to pick with you. Regards, Jack |
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
|
I use compression drivers instead of dome tweeters. This to me is the biggest difference in the discussion. CDs have higher sensitivity (when coupled with the right horn), higher power handling, and will go lower in frequency. (generally speaking)
So in a the two ways that I consider, it is a 700-2khz crossover point for two ways. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Numerical Solving Techniques for Optimum Crossover Design | thadman | Multi-Way | 5 | 21st May 2009 05:29 AM |
| Optimum frequency response curves in the bass range | The golden mean | Subwoofers | 8 | 30th June 2008 05:22 PM |
| Crossover Frequency | Ironhead | Multi-Way | 14 | 17th June 2008 09:12 PM |
| crossover frequency | Laufer | Multi-Way | 2 | 22nd October 2003 06:52 PM |
| crossover frequency | ray | Multi-Way | 1 | 10th September 2001 06:31 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |