Optimum crossover frequency? - Page 2 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th February 2013, 03:53 PM   #11
diyAudio Member
 
mondogenerator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: City Of Villans
Blog Entries: 1
agreed. My mains are xo at 3.5k 2nd order, actual slope nearer to 3rd or higher. No issue with my mids. Trying to push higher and use ribbons instead i mod xo to 4k. Not bad but the change in polars was discernable. Im currently playing with an Alpair 5 playing to 6k and the ribbon from 6k. Both 2nd order. The polars seem to match very well. Next i aim to try the 1st order LP for the woofer that will underpin the whole design. In short a 3" mid is the easiest match, for me, to keep polar pattern behaved thru the range 500-5khz, and match my ribbons. Surprisingly they dont complain at the 2nd order @ 6k. THAT made my day.
__________________
Every new piece of knowledge pushes something else out of my brain - Homer.....................Simpson
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th February 2013, 09:33 PM   #12
ScottG is offline ScottG  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: US
Quote:
Originally Posted by markusA View Post

Where do you actually start?
What is the best target frequency for the crossover?
Is there a way to have it all?
What are the compromises?

In this particular thread I would like to focus on finding the optimum crossover frequency taking into account human hearing and perception.

Start with a design goal, knowing trade-offs involved in that design.


The best target freq. for a crossover is relational to the driver's performance on a real baffle (..assuming a baffle is used).



I'll take a brief look into one aspect of a loudspeaker's design:

The low-pass filter freq. "limit".


In a traditional multi-way design (particularly with "cone" drivers), a good place to start with regard to a low-pass filter is simply looking at the driver's diaphragm diameter in relation to wavelengths. For a shot at maximum performance at higher freq.s, crossover an octave (or more) lower than the driver-diameter's wavelength.

Ex. 6.5" driver typically has a **cone/diaphragm** diameter (not surround) around 5". Start plugging in freq.s to a wavelength calculator until you come up with that distance: Wavelength

2.7 kHz in this case. Then divide that number by 2 = 1.35 kHz for the max low-pass filter upper freq. limit.

Again though, that's for a shot at getting *maximum* performance from the speaker at it's upper freq..

It's a generic starting-point where you start to make compromises. Often a bit higher in freq. for a higher order filter, lower for a very low order filter. (..an "average" filter would likely be a LR 2nd order.)


This design constraint imposes several favorable qualities:

1. typically similar dispersion matching between drivers at crossover on a standard baffle,

2.* usually (or primarily) within piston operation (..as opposed to bending-wave operation),

3. wavelength vs. acoustic center for the two drivers being crossed over have a better chance of producing fewer combing artifacts, and

4. moving mass of the driver tends to be better at the top of its pass-band. (i.e. the higher the freq. the lower the mass - produces better results both objectively and subjectively.)

*piston operation is a more linear mode of operation (..and is how the driver is designed to operate), however even at this relatively low low-pass freq. you still need to be concerned with un-damped modes in the cone "bouncing" off of the surround and interacting with each other - which tends to produce a dip in response with a resulting linear resonant mode (..which can easily be seen in a CSD plot).

Ex. Tangband W4-1757S at 2.1 kHz
http://www.zaphaudio.com/temp/Tangband-W4-1757S-CSD.gif

(..a resonant build-up in the cone profile insufficiently damped by the surround. Note: this is a flat-profile diaphragm that exacerbates this condition).

Note that this is different than the break-up mode(s) of the particular driver. Break-up mode(s) occur at a point where the driver is no longer operating as a piston (..which tends to be slightly higher in freq. than the wavelength of the diaphragm's diameter). Of course moving an octave lower for the low-pass than the break-up modes of the driver is one of the major benefits under #2 above.
__________________
perspective is everything

Last edited by ScottG; 15th February 2013 at 09:46 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th February 2013, 09:43 PM   #13
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
In a 2-way, an XO of ~150-350 Hz. Allows you to keep drivers within a 1/4 wl at the XO. Lobbing is not an issue. Distribution (octave wize) is more equatible.

Not without issues (especially if passive XO), but like any design, thining it out is necessary.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th February 2013, 10:14 PM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Knoxville, TN
My (activley biamped) 2-way speakers are crossed at 450 Hz LR/24 to the bass bin and 380 Hz LR/24 to the tweeter (a 2" driver). I always thought the crossover would be at the same Hz or the tweeter might cross higher. I never expected a tweeter driver, even a 2" might be crossed lower than the bass bin.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th February 2013, 11:00 PM   #15
18Hurts is offline 18Hurts  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
I built a pair of 3-way speakers

Used 375Hz for the woofer to mids and 6KHz for the 3" mid to tweeter crossover points. Found that I prefer the crossover points to be well out of the traditional female vocal range and let one driver take care of that.

In a way, it reminds me of the "helper woofer" and "helper tweeter" the full range speaker crew advocates but not the 150Hz and 10KHz cross points.

Since I "steal" information from the full range forum, the multi-way forum and the subwoofer forum... I don't follow any specific acoustic religion.

Thankfully, the concept of taking a full range, adding a tweeter and running an active woofer at 200Hz and down is much easier now. With the price of inductors going through the roof, adding a 100 watt amplifier with 200Hz active filtering is getting close to price parity with passive.

My next project will be just that, Mark Audio 5" full range, small tweeter crossing at around 8K or so with just a cap and a 100 watt active amp with electronic filter. A simple T amp to drive the wide band mid/tweeter at 10 watts or so and the 100 watt amp to drive the inefficient 6.25" subwoofer. My theory is to crossover way out of the vocal/guitar/piano bands and adjust the bass actively with plenty of power to spare for computer based EQ. The desktop speakers will then be complete.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2013, 12:18 AM   #16
just another
diyAudio Moderator
 
wintermute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney
Blog Entries: 22
Like tvrgeek said, it depends! what does it depend on? Well I would say a lot of things but most importantly it depends on what compromises you are willing to make, and on how the chosen drivers actually perform.

I would suggest that unless you have very well matched and behaved drivers that the "best" crossover point is going to be more dependent on the drivers and baffle setup than it is on any theoretical best point

for my MTM's I ended up going with 2.8Khz 4th order acoustic Bessel because that was what worked best for me.

Attached are off axis measurements mids are 5" units. I think that the result is quite acceptable personally I will eventually be adding in my 10" stereo subs somewhere between 200 and 300Hz but they play very nicely as is right now.

Tony.
Attached Images
File Type: png horizontal_polar.png (45.1 KB, 197 views)
__________________
Any intelligence I may appear to have is purely artificial!
Some of my photos
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2013, 06:44 AM   #17
lolo is offline lolo  France
diyAudio Member
 
lolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: somewhere by the border..
If you like narrow dispersion, yes, waveguides. But, the design becomes omni again below 5-600 hz. That's an important area.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2013, 08:04 AM   #18
AllenB is offline AllenB  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Narrow directivity isn't thought to be as important at 500Hz as we aren't as sensitive down here. An omni pattern (as most speakers will either have or be moving towards) will still support reflections that cause colourations, but we all deal with those.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2013, 03:57 PM   #19
markusA is offline markusA  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
markusA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Gothenburg
Blog Entries: 1
It's been a busy weekend on my part and I feel like I'm close to flatlining my eeg at the moment but I'll post a thought anyway.

Looking at equal loudness-contour plots hearing looks to shouw roughly the same sensitivity between 500Hz and 4kHz at 80Phon which would indicate a reasonable listening level (80dB). (2-4kHz extra sensitive)

Human voice fundamentals are often referred to as 80-1100Hz.
I've seen claims that advocate frequencies above the previously mentioned 1100Hz as very important to details and nuances in voices and music.
Frequencies above 5kHz doesn't look to important for voices. Some added details but nothing critical.

Combining the equal-loudness plots/hearing sensitivity with human vocal range, keeping the crossover as low as possible looks sensible.
A wideband/fullrange speaker crossed to a woofer looks like an interesting alternative.

Geddes designs with waveguides put the x-over in the 1-1.5kHz area somewhere I think?
This would be well withing the sensitive (but not super sensitive) area of hearing perception but still allowing the tweeter to handle most of the important nuances.

Linkwitz also seem to favour a crossover in the 1-1.5kHz area when you look at both the Pluto and the Orion.

Geddes looks to be relying much on directivity control and phase coherence?
From what I've read phase coherence is importat at the crossover +/- 1 octave depending on the order of the filter.

I haven't really been able to grasp the directivity bit fully so far.

It's much like laying a puzzle with an image of half ocean and half sky. Definately a challenge.
These are just a few thoughts of mine, I'm very much learning from you guys.

The rule of thumb mentioned above using a crossover at least one octave below the matching wavelength for the driver diameter seems to fall within sound design thinking.

I'll stop my rambling now.

P.S. Reasonably sized horns and waveguides seem to have a hard times handeling frequencies below 1kHz or am I imagining things? (Just looking at the high frequency spectrum at this point, not counting mid or bass horns.)

Let's hope I haven't confused everything. Lol
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2013, 05:15 PM   #20
OllBoll is offline OllBoll  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Isn't the best crossover frequency simply where the drivers overlap in directivity?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Numerical Solving Techniques for Optimum Crossover Design thadman Multi-Way 5 21st May 2009 05:29 AM
Optimum frequency response curves in the bass range The golden mean Subwoofers 8 30th June 2008 05:22 PM
Crossover Frequency Ironhead Multi-Way 14 17th June 2008 09:12 PM
crossover frequency Laufer Multi-Way 2 22nd October 2003 06:52 PM
crossover frequency ray Multi-Way 1 10th September 2001 06:31 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:30 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2