|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
I have a conventional electronic cross-over. It has no CD-compensation function. But I checked some measurements of the de250 with Wayne's H290C horn, without compensation:
![]() Will there be an audible difference with CD-compensation? The response of the driver-horn combination seems quite good to me, even without compensation! However, I sent Wayne a mail with the question which passive adjustments are required with active X-over. Last edited by vandevoordekoen; 18th January 2013 at 12:47 PM. |
|
|
|
#52 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
|
Yeah, you might want a bit of a downward tilt to the overall system response (I do with this type of speaker), but the uncompensated response is not a great starting point. I think you'd find that to avoid excessive "bright" sound, you would have to turn the HF attenuation down to the point of not really having any upper treble.
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
You mean, attenuate the overal response of the de250? Or just the highest frequencies?
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
|
I meant overall - the main HF level knob on the crossover. The shelf-like 2-5kHz response caused by the waveguide will sound bright, unless you turn it down enough for that part to match the woofer level, and if you do that the 10-20kHz octave will be quite low.
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Thank you for the explanation, Dumptruck. I read through the forum of Waynes website to understand completely what CD compensation is.
Here I found a good explanation (read Waynes answer): AudioRoundTable.com: Pi Speakers => Erse caps, attenuation circuits. Wayne uses a R1/R2/C1 configuration to adjust the frequency response of the HF driver. The specific values he uses for the 4pi speakers: Pi Speaker Forum - Clarification of attenuation values - Wayne Parham, August 01, 2002 at 12:48:20 This is the schematic of the 4pi passive cross-over design: ![]() If I'm right, I just have to use use the R1 and R2 for the b&c de250 (C1 can be omitted). Till here my 'knowledge'. I'm not an engineer, so here is my question to the members of the forum: Can I use the same values for my active setup (same drivers, same h290C horn, same enclosure) for CD compensation. I'd like to obtain a similar top octave compensation response curve as obtained with the passive crossover. Thank you very much! |
|
|
|
#56 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cascais
|
Quote:
R1/C1 is the compensation.
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cascais
|
C2/L1/C3 it's a 3. order.
R2 is part of the l-pad. hope this is clear like water... |
|
|
|
#58 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
I'm sorry, I don't understand at all
![]() I thought that CD compensation is done by 2 resistors and a capacitator. The values of the components vary in accordance with the tweeter compensation you want to do. (correct me if I'm wrong) Here I copied a chart of this configuration, found on Waynes forum: Quote:
R1 = 25 ohm R2 = 16 ohm C1 = 0.47uF But looking at the cross-over for the 4pi speaker, I saw there is a little adjustment in the tweeter compensation configuration for de de250 driver: point 8: C1 is 0,47µF for 2426H tweeter, omitted for de250 and psd2002. ![]() I concluded (please correct me if I'm wrong!) that just R1 and R2 compensate the tweeter response. However, Wayne mailed me that I wouldn't need a 12dB equalization. Looking at the following response curve of the de250 on a h290c horn, I think an attenuation of 3dB (or 6dB) before mass rolloff would be ok (active crossover: 1,6khz, so don't look at the lower frequencies) ![]() I hope that you can help me with this ![]() thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
I think I'm wrong here.
Wayne mailed me about this, he's extremely helpfull. (and I understand now what you want to say Inductor )But I'll have to read a lot to find out which components and which values I have to use to compensate the mass rolloff of the tweeter. ![]() If somebody has done this before, don't hesitate to inform me
|
|
|
|
#60 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cascais
|
Quote:
1. Invert polarity for JBL's woofers as Black>+2/Red>-2 2. n.a. 3. DE250 tweeter Black>+1/Red>-1 4. n.a. 5. R2 = 15R/10Wn.i. 6. DE250 tweeter R1a/R1c = 20R/n.i., R1b/R1d = 30R/n.i. 7. C1 is omitted for DE250 tweeter (no compensation) 8. 9. 10. I translated this (not complicated) for you. Hope this helps. You might not need it by now... Quote:
(ps: we are already repeating ourselves, have a nice time. )
Last edited by Inductor; 20th January 2013 at 07:49 PM. Reason: DE250 crossover |
||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Upgrading my lambdas | jimbones | Multi-Way | 0 | 14th October 2012 12:53 PM |
| upgrading irfz's | AKHeathen | Car Audio | 8 | 20th April 2011 12:08 PM |
| TDA2030 Upgrading | livenicely | Chip Amps | 6 | 8th November 2010 08:56 AM |
| Upgrading DM2 | beamnet | Multi-Way | 2 | 7th December 2007 03:00 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |