how to... - Page 2 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th December 2012, 02:34 PM   #11
balerit is offline balerit  South Africa
diyAudio Member
 
balerit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Africa
My TQWP speakers do this without any fancy electronics.

http://novelbooks.weebly.com/camm-dy...dspeakers.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2012, 03:09 PM   #12
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjorno View Post
Hi,


*1: Add 2 (mono-summed works well too)) >= 42 mS(15m) signal delayed Bessel arrays= Best as phase is slightly 'scrambled, 5-6 element arrays= good enough) visually in a straight line behind(or use a wider azimuth) the main speakers(or simpler DBA:s) wall mounted adjusted to a level near JND, i.e. at or bit higher depending on source material. FR slope = 'Pink' ~3 dB/octave: BW~60-800Hz.
Interesting idea ! Some questions:
-what's the psycho-acoustic rationale of "FR slope = 'Pink' ~3 dB/octave: BW~60-800Hz" ? Making sure you induce a simulated far reflection only in the ITD range and avoid the "filler" speakers to attract attention on them ?
- what does "visually in a straight line behind" exactly mean ? a horizontally spread array of in-wall speakers from the L to the R loudspeaker ?
- how does it sound ? Did you try it yourself ?

Thanks !
__________________
I don't believe in audio believings.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2012, 03:36 PM   #13
diyAudio Member
 
mondogenerator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: City Of Villans
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by balerit View Post
My TQWP speakers do this without any fancy electronics.

Voig Pipe, DIY Tapered Quarter Wave Pipe (TQWP) loudspeaker plans - The Book Worm
lol mine too. I dont use dsp widening for music. An array is reputedly capable of throwimg a larger than life image. Im happy with a realistic size image.

The best 'electronics free' method to increase imaging clarity is the method most often quoted: speaker placement and minimal judicious use of reflective absorption.
__________________
Every new piece of knowledge pushes something else out of my brain - Homer.....................Simpson

Last edited by mondogenerator; 10th December 2012 at 03:46 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2012, 07:18 PM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
JamesTRexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by theaudiophile View Post
This is not what I meant. If you use such a device you are adding reverb or changing the recording quite a lot. I wondered if the original depth in the recording can be magically removed or enhanced. I guess no such device is possible?
Dipole speakers. Only for enhancing (or restoring) though, not removing, and not so much magical. :-)

I'd say from experience with my set;
#1: use dipole speakers (in a not too damped room)
#2: place woofers against the sidewalls (using an OSD placement might be even better but I'd have to build 4 extra towers/stands)
#3: use active crossovers/amplification and don't be afraid to use an equalizer (in moderation of course)
__________________
Source: FreeBSD & XMMS on VIA Eden, Terratec Aureon 5.1 / Yamaha GT-CD1 Processing: DEQ2496, 2x DCX2496 Amps: 4x EP2000, 2x EP4000
The Gate, best speakers in the world? :-)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2012, 10:04 PM   #15
diyAudio Member
 
Moondog55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Norlane; Geelong: Victoria: Australia
Easiest answer is get a better listening room; IMO most of our listening spaces are sub optimal
__________________
QUOTE" The more I know, the more I know, I know (insert maniacal laugh >here<) NOTHING"
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2012, 11:36 PM   #16
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Birmingham, UK
I fail to see a qualitative difference between using a reverb and using speakers which spread their sound all over the place in an only lightly (or not at all) damped room.
Except that a reverb is more controllable.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2012, 12:27 AM   #17
ra7 is offline ra7  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Blog Entries: 1
To the OP, I really appreciate your curiosity and quest for learning. How about taking some advice and buying Toole's book? Many of your questions will be answered.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2012, 12:54 AM   #18
diyAudio Member
 
Melo theory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Gulfport fl.
Ambio4YOU - Ambiophonic DSP | miniAMBIO
__________________
I LIKE YOU
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2012, 01:07 AM   #19
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Maine, Bangor-area
Working with a two-way speaker system, and the cross-over frequency equals about 2 kHz, it is possible to reflect the sound of the tweeter off of a nearby reflector that can be maybe 12" wide by 10" high towards the listening position. Assuming that you set the radius of curvature (concavity) of the reflector and the distance of the tweeter from the reflector correctly, then the sound of the speaker seems to originate from a point behind the speaker.

I've developed this reflecting method extensively.

Regards,
Pete
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2012, 02:37 AM   #20
diyAudio Member
 
paulspencer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
A conventional speaker will place sounds in between the speakers, or behind them by reproducing cues of the original acoustic space in the recording. Most people prefer this done well and room treatment can allow you to adjust the balance of direct to reflected sound.

Dipoles increase the sound stage depth due to the strong front wall reflection - basically they are creating a secondary phantom acoustic source - imagine that the front wall were a tinted glass mirror. The sound stage is made artifically deeper. It can be a desirable effect, especially with classical music where a live source is being reproduced that is much larger than the listening room. However, in other situations where you want a focused sharp image, dipoles don't perform as well. You don't get the same pinpoint imaging - I find that I notice it with vocals and HT use quite a bit. In other words, you pay a price to achieve this effect and you have to ask if it's really what you want.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:04 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2