|25th November 2012, 01:51 AM||#51|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Blog Entries: 27
Winslow - I promised to keep you posted on some measurements of the BEYMA 10XC25.
Tests I did today have shown that:
- The 1/3 octave smoothed measurements are very (very) close to those published by Beyma.
- A close investigation of the published plots indicated there may be a bit of fun ang games to get a relatively smooth an uncoloured response.
- Making measurements without smoothing there are a couple of features that really impact these for use outside sound reinforcement - in my humble opinion...
Beyma 10xc25 Nopara.pdf
Things of relevance to these measurements:
- Driver mounted in 280mm wide, 320mm high closed box stuffed with wool. (sizes approximate)
- Enclosure about 1.3 metres from floor and ceiling.
- Measurement made at 1 metre on axis
- Behringer cal mic used
- SPL something in the order of 90-100dB
- Gated measurements used - hence loss of meaningful data at low frequencies. (Cut off plots)
The top 3 plots have no smoothing applied at all. When smoothed these are remarkably similar to the Beyma data.
I also measured the second driver, which coincidentally I just reconed, and the response is smack on the OEM response. A nice thing to see!
The way I think Beyma address the rising response in the bass unit is to put the XO at 2KHz (if I recall 2.2?) and use this to roll off the rising response of the bass unit.
That dip in the horn is there, and is real. Without active EQ not a lot is going to fix that. That said, the unsmoothed response is rather unflattering - when run through a 1/3 octave smoothing, there is still a dip but it does not look like a chasm.
The plot showing bass and horn response is rather daunting... A quick listen to the bass driver shows it really does need some work.
I have not had a lot of time to think this through yet - but did choose to play with some active EQ on this to see how it could be "beaten into submission". I have not tried to be elegant e.g. using the rolloff of a high order XO's on the bass unit to flatten out the peak - just for now I "smacked it down" with a parametric EQ.
That said, with enough EQ you get the response shown at the bottom. It looks better than is sounds - though I suspect that a pair of these with a sub would be respectable.
Just for giggles - here is what I did in terms of EQ...
- BASS Unit EQ1:
Centre Freq: 1700Hz
- BASS Unit EQ2:
Centre Freq: 300Hz
- BASS Unit EQ3:
Centre Freq: 500Hz
- Horn Unit EQ1:
Centre Freq: 7000Hz
- Horn Unit EQ2:
Centre Freq: 4850Hz
- Horn Unit EQ3:
Centre Freq: 7000Hz (yes - but High Q)
Would I use them like this? No.
Will they work, and would they be good for PA? Yes
Are they HIFI? I don't think so yet...
Last edited by googlyone; 25th November 2012 at 01:56 AM. Reason: update
|9th December 2012, 01:23 AM||#52|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Diego
You're sitting very close to the drivers.
For instance, if I listen to my Summas at a distance of 4-6 meters, they blend well. But if you listen to them very close, the transition to the midrange suffers because you're in the nearfield.
Long story short, I prefer not to listen to speakers in the nearfield, and in the car that's hard to do because of the large distances between woofer and tweeter.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|3-way with big (10") woofer and monitor (6.5"+1") on top like "Tarkus"||proxii||Multi-Way||16||30th October 2012 01:43 PM|
|kinda ot... 10" x 10" x 10" aluminum block/bar, does such thing exist?||Mickey||Pass Labs||9||15th November 2011 09:22 PM|
|Vintage Audax A150-X 15" coaxes||whiteSE||Swap Meet||2||1st January 2007 09:02 PM|
|BMS's new 12" coaxes||Pallas||Multi-Way||0||26th April 2005 07:07 AM|
|New To Site?||Need Help?|