Trinaural decoding equations for 3 speaker stereo matrix ? - Page 2 - diyAudio
 Trinaural decoding equations for 3 speaker stereo matrix ?
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Jun 2007
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Elias It is well known optimum linear matrix provides 6dB electrical separation between the three front channels.
Is that 6dB between L & C (or R & C) or is that 6dB between L & R ?

And is that true when the level of L (or R) is the same as C?

 5th November 2012, 09:39 PM #12 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Central Berlin, Germany What is the ideal directivity pattern for stereo speakers? Bongiorno's Trinaural is the same as Miles' Optimum Linear Matrix with k=0.5 and also one of Gerzon's TriField variants, if I gather up things correctly.
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Paris
Quote:
 Originally Posted by KSTR C=L+R, L'=L-0.5R, R'=R-0.5L
With this approach you are reducing comb filtering for a correlated signal by 6dB, but then you also get comb filtering on uncorrelated signals. Is it worth it?
I ask this because I find comb filtering between the two speakers to be the major drawback of stereo reproduction: it makes me aware of the two loudspeakers and takes me out of the stereo illusion all the time, resulting in a diffuse phantom image...

I have never tried Trinaural, but if it adds some more comb filtering how can it produce a better illusion?

diyAudio Member

Join Date: May 2003
Location: Suomi
Quote:
 Originally Posted by KSTR Bongiorno's Trinaural is the same as Miles' Optimum Linear Matrix with k=0.5
Now we are getting somewhere ! Does there exist a reference for this information ?

Quote:
 Originally Posted by KSTR and also one of Gerzon's TriField variants, if I gather up things correctly.
I don't remember Gerzon had a matrix with 0.5 ? Which particular one this could be ?

- Elias
__________________
Liberate yourself from the illusion of two speaker stereo triangle
Dipole Bass vs Monopole Bass Stereophonic Sound from a Single Loudspeaker 3 Speaker Linear Stereo Matrix Wavelets

diyAudio Member

Join Date: May 2003
Location: Suomi
Quote:
 Originally Posted by WithTarragon Is that 6dB between L & C (or R & C) or is that 6dB between L & R ? And is that true when the level of L (or R) is the same as C?
I should have said three front speakers. There is only two channels, of course. But yes, between three speakers maximum separation is 6 dB, L <-> C and L <-> R.
__________________
Liberate yourself from the illusion of two speaker stereo triangle
Dipole Bass vs Monopole Bass Stereophonic Sound from a Single Loudspeaker 3 Speaker Linear Stereo Matrix Wavelets

 5th November 2012, 10:50 PM #16 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Central Berlin, Germany That will remain to personal taste I guess. Some people are more sensitive to subtle tonal coulouring etc, others are more after the most realistic spatial impression. Trinaural is more something for the second group, one could say. Also it may depend on the genre and style of music you play. Trinaural makes a different sound field around your head and quite more a difference in the room sound, and, if only for this, it is different. In fact Tri positions and sizes different kinds of phantom sources in a slightly different way than 2 speakers, and this not always in a "better" way. But more often it does, for me.
diyAudio Member

Join Date: May 2003
Location: Suomi
Quote:
 Originally Posted by pos With this approach you are reducing comb filtering for a correlated signal by 6dB, but then you also get comb filtering on uncorrelated signals.
Uncorrelated signals cannot comb filter. If there is comb filtering then the signals are correlated to some degree.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by pos Is it worth it? I ask this because I find comb filtering between the two speakers to be the major drawback of stereo reproduction: it makes me aware of the two loudspeakers and takes me out of the stereo illusion all the time, resulting in a diffuse phantom image... I have never tried Trinaural, but if it adds some more comb filtering how can it produce a better illusion?

It is worth it.

I've been listening a couple of weeks 3 speaker stereo matrix with coefficient of 0.5, the optimum matrix. I have three identical prototype speakers, and I'm doing extensive comparisons with standard 2 speaker stereo. I can change the configuration from the listening position by use of a switch so A/B comparison is immediate.

So far I've listened about 100 songs and there is no single song I prefer with 2 speaker over the 3 speakers. That should tell some direction already

- Elias
__________________
Liberate yourself from the illusion of two speaker stereo triangle
Dipole Bass vs Monopole Bass Stereophonic Sound from a Single Loudspeaker 3 Speaker Linear Stereo Matrix Wavelets

diyAudio Member

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Central Berlin, Germany
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Elias I don't remember Gerzon had a matrix with 0.5 ? Which particular one this could be ?
The basic TriField equations are :
L' = 0.5[(sin(phi) + w)L + (sin(phi) - w)R],
R' correspondingly, and
C = sqrt(2)cos(phi)(L+R)

A certain selection of phi and w should yield the trinaural amplitude relationships but I haven't tried to solve the eq's
EDIT: Once I progress to try a 3-way full TriField matrix with the coeffs that Gerzon recommends, and with DSP linear phase, I'll know....

Last edited by KSTR; 5th November 2012 at 11:52 PM.

diyAudio Member

Join Date: May 2003
Location: Suomi
Quote:
 Originally Posted by KSTR EDIT: Once I progress to try a 3-way full TriField matrix with the coeffs that Gerzon recommends, and with DSP linear phase, I'll know....
It could be interesting. Is it known what order the low-high pass filters are in Trifield decoder ? I've allways assumed 1st order.
__________________
Liberate yourself from the illusion of two speaker stereo triangle
Dipole Bass vs Monopole Bass Stereophonic Sound from a Single Loudspeaker 3 Speaker Linear Stereo Matrix Wavelets

diyAudio Member

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Paris
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Elias Uncorrelated signals cannot comb filter. If there is comb filtering then the signals are correlated to some degree.
An uncorrelated L/R stereo signal split into 3 speakers following this matrix will result in correlated sound between speakers, as they all have sums or differences of L and R...

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are Off Refbacks are Off Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post rockguitardude Planars & Exotics 11 1st June 2011 06:40 AM sixSixSeven Tubes / Valves 1 23rd March 2011 04:33 PM Nordic Chip Amps 14 18th January 2006 12:15 PM guinness Car Audio 1 17th November 2004 12:22 AM Bill Fitzpatrick Multi-Way 11 17th January 2003 10:17 PM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:56 AM.