|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#131 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
|
Last week I was listening to a 2-> 3 matrix with coeff 0.5 in Reaper (I'll upgrade to Markus' script, thanks for posting that). For the afternoon I'm using Dolby PLIIx from my soundcard (Xonar) output.
What exactly does it do frequency wise? It cuts up processing band by band, but how? The Wikipedia article doesn't really say. Or am I totally mistaken and it is just a sqrt(2) center if I'm using 3 speakers. |
|
|
|
#132 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where you live
|
Quote:
I lifted the tubes so that elements are on ear height. First listened with elements aimed to the listener, then aimed the elements towards the ceiling. This was with passive matrix wiring with coefficient of 0.5. So they were kind of omnis.Then I placed a large (60*80cm) baffles just behind each tube to make them 2pi radiators, and it was much better ! Omni midrange ? I don't like it very much. It sounds too ambigouos and not very clear. Half space midrange is better, also with matrix. - Elias
__________________
Home page If our hearing would be accurate, we would be hearing two loudspeakers. |
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Enschede, Overijssel
|
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Switzerland
|
If you use the energy-preserving code then remove the 3dB attenuation for the center. Simply replace
Code:
c_out = 0.7071*m_c; Code:
c_out = m_c;
__________________
Markus |
|
|
|
#136 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: somewhere by the border..
|
|
|
|
|
#137 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Switzerland
|
Just for the sake of completeness here's the "final" Reaper code for a energy-preserving matrix decoder after Gerzon:
http://mehlau.net/audio/matrix_decoder/
__________________
Markus |
|
|
|
#138 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where you live
|
I found some more confirmation on Trinaural matrix coefficients from here
http://www.nubert-forum.de/nuforum/v...42a5023fc0a493 And the matrix coefficients according to them are: Quote:
The thing I don't know is how they know it ![]() - Elias
__________________
Home page If our hearing would be accurate, we would be hearing two loudspeakers. |
|
|
|
|
#139 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Switzerland
|
That's TriSonic (AES Preprint: "An Optimum Linear-Matrix Stereo Imaging System") with a matrix factor of 0.5.
Just a sub-version of Gerzon's energy-preserving decoder.
__________________
Markus |
|
|
|
#140 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Switzerland
|
A post by Elias just got lost?
__________________
Markus |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Planar & Ribbon Speaker Equations | rockguitardude | Planars & Exotics | 11 | 1st June 2011 05:40 AM |
| Me again... matrix decoding w/ tubes? | sixSixSeven | Tubes / Valves | 1 | 23rd March 2011 03:33 PM |
| Stereo to 5.1 hafler matrix decoder | Nordic | Chip Amps | 14 | 18th January 2006 11:15 AM |
| decoding input | guinness | Car Audio | 1 | 16th November 2004 11:22 PM |
| Trinaural - Anyone heard this? | Bill Fitzpatrick | Multi-Way | 11 | 17th January 2003 09:17 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |