|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Quote:
but I will take the opportunity to say I think of passive crossovers as a blessing meaning that most of what we know about speaker design today would not have been possible without |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
I think it IS that simple, tinitus.
![]() The bass coil in a passive crossover is not the culprit with sloppy bass. Far more to do with room acoustics, box design and Q and room damping. Room gain is an enormous factor. You really won't get good bass with a big speaker in a small lively room. It's gonna BOOM! Why does no-one ever GET IT with Steen Duelund's simple thought model? ![]() ![]() Lead a horse to water, an all that...
__________________
Good Night, and Good Luck. Best regards from Steve in Portsmouth, UK. |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Athens, Greece
|
damping factor and "sloppy bass" has nothing to do with "distortion" from passive components since, by definition, linear and time-invariant systems, such as those by passive devices can NOT introduce distortion on sinewaves but only phase delay and attenuation.
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Quote:
but not always right but since you dont know it all yet back to building speakers ![]() btw, now you mention Steen Duelund he spent many years trying to devellop better crossover components, and drivers because he believed it would be impossible to build his dream speakers with what was available unfortunately a fatal decision |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Birmingham, UK
|
Quote:
Admittedly the active xover has 24dB L-R slopes as opposed to the 12dB original but most of the audible difference is well below the unchanged 1.2k xover point. |
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
|
Quote:
Passive, active, done correctly they are indistinguishable. Done wrong and both can be a disaster. Active excels sometimes, but until recently active was just too expensive for anything but DIY. These days, DSP is so cheap that it makes more sense, but its still more expensive (two amps versus one.) |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Birmingham, UK
|
I would possibly agree if it weren't for my friend who noticed the change almost immediately without knowing anything about the change I made.
It took him about 5 minutes to notice any change after I swapped op amps in my crossover at later time. |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
only mentioned that bass was improved
but it could just as well be amp related or the box isnt optimal lots of other things could have influence but I suppose active will most likely give some advantage if it replaces a poorly designed passive crossover and only if its a well designed speaker, as such if the whole speaker is sick, active wont cure it |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Birmingham, UK
|
Couldn't hear much difference in the treble, the amp in question is an MC2 Audio MC450.
The amp for the treble is now an MC2 Audio T500. As I said box, room, placement and xover point remained identical. |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Well there will be a small amount of bass change due to the inductors series resistance.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Active or Passive | bjackson | Multi-Way | 30 | 4th April 2005 10:49 PM |
| Passive into active | MethMan | Multi-Way | 8 | 12th January 2005 04:58 PM |
| Active of passive | audiobomber | Multi-Way | 9 | 31st July 2004 02:31 AM |
| dB loss by using passive crossovers? Active vs Passive and 1st vs 4th order | Hybrid fourdoor | Multi-Way | 3 | 11th July 2004 09:16 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10057 seconds (100.00% PHP - 0% MySQL) with 10 queries |