|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London
|
I am working on a 3 way OB crossover and will be ordering some capacitors for the mid driver.
I was thinking Intertechnik/Elko electrolytics should be fine in parallel. However I have been reading confusing views on the effects of series capacitors. Lukasz Fikus (Lukasz Fikus Lampizator) says: "In 99 % of cases a 100 uF MKP cap works great. Any non-electrolytic is good. There are for example good MKP caps for passive power compensation in home appliances. If I listen to a programme via such cap and without (material is vocal without bass content) I hear absolutely no sound degradation due to this cap. It is transparent to the midrange content. I cant detect when this cap is shorted in bypass. It is completely transparent. DONT EVER SPEND $$$ on the exotic caps here !! Please !" Troels Gravesen says: "There is one serious issue here: The quality of the 88 uF to the midrange. Initially I ran 82 uF* standard polyprop caps bypassed by 1 uF Superior Z-cap. After several hours of listening I pooled all my Superior Z-caps to make 84 uF and replaced the standard caps. Sorry to say, it's night and day. Any standard polyprop sounds compressed compared to the Superior Z combo. Eight times 22 uF quality caps don't come for nothing, but once we've heard the super caps vs. standard polyprops, it's very clear there's no free lunch here." (that is over $600 worth of caps btw) What do you think? Does bypassing a large electrolytic by a small polypropylene help? Is it recommended? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I use film types in series with mids in a 3-way. Also, when recapping, I replace NPE's with film type whenever possible.
What value series mid cap do you have? Just remember, Troels is a cost-no-object DIY'r in most cases. He uses high quality drivers and makes VERY high quality cabinetry - both which justify spending the $$ on maximizing the sonic quality of his projects; at least to his ears.
__________________
"It's all about the music!" Last edited by speakerdoctor; 9th October 2012 at 03:55 PM. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Md
|
My experience: Any poly sounds better than any electro. I can't say that in a crossover a poly bypassing the electro makes as big a difference as it does in a low level active stage. Poly-pro meats mylar, but not as much as the jump from the electro. Would $600 worth of caps sound better than better drivers? Better than a finer tuned crossover? The only true answer is "it's your ears."
What do I use? Basic Dayton's |
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
|
Quote:
__________________
Auricap XO, Mundorf capacitors, coils, MSolder, terminals, DH-Labs interconnect & speaker cables, internal wiring for DIY & upgrades are here: www.audiohobby.eu |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: vancouver
|
Ditto on above.. Electros Do need replacing.
But I've heard darned little (if any?) differences in Cap quality beyond decent poly film types in a passive Crossover. Regardless of what I had to pay for the Audio Weenie approved types. But it's your $$ and your dreams. Ideally, long experience engenders wisdom .. sometimes :_) |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London
|
Drivers are all vintage Seas alnicos from early 1970s.
Midrange is a high eff. 8" papercone: Seas 21 TV-GW I was initially thinking a 1st order filter on both ends of the midranger. Bass and tweeter will be 2nd order. This is what lampizator uses in his open baffle designs. With the natural roll-off of the midrange driver, 1st order filter behaves 2nd order sonically. So at a minimum, I should be using the entry level PP caps from Jantzen (Cross Cap). I can save some money by moving to a 2nd order on the mids too. This would reduce the series cap from 100 to about 40. But then I need a coil in parallel. So what do you think about the parallel coil in the midrange? Air or aronite cored? JANTZEN-1781 - Jantzen Wire air coil 10,000mH 4,230Ohm 0,70mm - Europe Audio JANTZEN-5310 - Jantzen Wire non-ferrite cored coil 10,000mH 1,290Ohm 0,70mm - Europe Audio Does the solid core introduce any ill effects when used in parallel? Does the DCR of the coil effect the efficiency of the driver when used in parallel? |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Capacitor in series with mid-bass -anyone else seen this? | Ian J | Multi-Way | 4 | 23rd January 2012 05:14 PM |
| how much important is a dc coupling output capacitor? | umut1001 | Solid State | 11 | 14th January 2008 10:00 PM |
| where is a resistor or a capacitor very important? | Stefanoo | Pass Labs | 5 | 12th January 2007 07:10 AM |
| Capacitor Choices...What's Important? | CarlosT | Chip Amps | 45 | 13th December 2006 05:42 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |