Stuffing "sound signature" - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th October 2012, 05:39 AM   #1
Remlab is offline Remlab  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mission Viejo Ca
Default Stuffing "sound signature"

Can a stuffing type have it's own sonic signature? Or does it all just come down to absorption coefficients? In other words, can two completely different materials (High grade acoustic wool felt vs foam for example) loaded in a cabinet in a way that "simulates" the same absorption coefficients(What the back of the diaphragm acoustically"sees" while in the cabinet.) have the potential to sound subjectively different when used in otherwise identical situations?
__________________
It's not what you don't know that causes trouble. It's what you do know that just ain't so..Mark Twain

Last edited by Remlab; 7th October 2012 at 06:15 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2012, 06:06 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: in half space
Since the various stuffings affect different frequencies, obviously "yes", but I think it will be overwhelmed by speaker and box signatures. I think any amateur builder who's listened to enough speakers in enough boxes to be able to identify the stuffing used when he walks into the room needs to get a hobby.

That said, I wouldn't doubt someone that said they could see the effects, or even predict the affect, on a graph.



(And yes, for you ESL folks, this is an example of the sometimes subtle difference between "effect" and "affect".)



Oh, except for stuffing a closed box to affect the tuning. Then it's just a matter of the R factor.

Last edited by Keriwena; 7th October 2012 at 06:16 AM. Reason: Forgot something. ;)
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2012, 06:22 AM   #3
ScottG is offline ScottG  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: US
To the extent it damps linear motion of a driver or port/line - yes. A lower freq. absorber tends to be "stiffer", and usually creates less damping of driver or port/line. Something "fluffier" that absorbs at higher freq.s tends to increase damping.

This is most noticeable with low mass, low x-max drivers with low energy absorption surrounds (..often "full-range").

The term: "sucks the life out of the driver" is a direct consequence of this.
__________________
perspective is everything

Last edited by ScottG; 7th October 2012 at 06:25 AM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DAC related "sound signature" CENTRAL Digital Source 38 30th June 2013 10:32 AM
Purpose of "stuffing" an Austin a166? blue lander Full Range 7 17th February 2010 10:32 AM
MFA Lumi - possible to "un-darken" the sound signature? marknoir Tubes / Valves 16 23rd January 2007 04:02 AM
Which mids and tweeters have the "velvety" signature to them? sqlkev Multi-Way 6 23rd February 2006 07:51 PM
Which stuffing material to increase "perceived" enlosure size? Two Moons Multi-Way 4 6th January 2002 04:27 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:14 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2