How to choose a speaker? - Page 2 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th October 2012, 07:38 AM   #11
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Enschede
I would choose the poly driver. It will probably have a slightly lower F3 and has a smoother response in the midrange (around 1 kHz).
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2012, 01:23 PM   #12
sreten is online now sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by balerit View Post
Your two speakers must have the same sensitivity so that
means you should use the SB17NRXC35-8. The impedance
at the crossover point will determine your crossover values.

Mac

The Book Worm - DIY Audio Ebooks and Manuals - Speakers, Moscode Amplifiers, Electronics, Map Reading, Free Capacitor Intro.

Hi,

Anyone who makes statements like the above shouldn't be
writing books about speaker design. The above is two
statements of standard beginners errors of fact.

Because of BSC the drivers sensitivities do not need to
be the same. More factors than the speakers impedance
need to be taken into account to arrive at the correct
crossover values for the acoustic target functions.

rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2012, 02:43 PM   #13
system7 is offline system7  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
system7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
I have found a another kit for the papyrus coned SB driver. This time the Meniscus Mandolin speaker designed by Jeff Bagby. Gotta be good, and far better than any homebrew design. Why reinvent the wheel?

The 15L Mandolin has a lower 2kHz crossover than the SB Eka kit, which should see off any cone-breakup horrors:
Mandolin Speaker Kit / Pr

Jeff has also designed a 7.5L version using a smaller SB papyrus driver called the Piccolo:
Piccolo
__________________
Good Night, and Good Luck. Best regards from Steve in Portsmouth, UK.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2012, 03:36 PM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
soft poly cones are fools gold. They appear to have very smooth frequency response and are perfect for low parts count crossovers. But all that means I'd that you're into breakup very early and audibly over a wide bandwidth. Stiff driver materials may need bit more crossover work, and don't really like mating to cheap tweeters, but also won't be mid fi.

Stiffness vs Damping... would be great to have both but given the choice I will lean towards the former. Have the driver be pistonic over as much of its passband as I can, and hopefully push its narrow band breakup well out of that passband. Sure would love to mess with Infinity's CMMD cones on some scan speak Illuminator motors though. Well I guess.that's what Accutons are!!

Last edited by RockLeeEV; 6th October 2012 at 03:48 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2012, 05:24 PM   #15
diyAudio Member
 
5th element's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England
Quote:
Originally Posted by upking View Post
The crossover will be a 2nd order Linkwitz-Riley at 2,5khz
I assume by this statement you mean that the final acoustic response of the woofer will look like a 2nd order LWR on axis at 2.5kHz. Simply slapping in a 2nd order LWR electrical network, calculated to text book values will not result in the former, which is what you are wanting to achieve.

Quote:
Originally Posted by upking View Post
But the truth is, I don't know the difference between exactly the same speaker but with different cone materials.
All drivers go through break up at some point and its this that really affects how a driver sounds. The best designs crossover before any break-up occurs so that its influence isn't part of the final design. Both the SB drivers go through their main break-up relatively high in frequency such that you can cross over before it becomes an issue.

Wide band drivers typically rely solely on controlled break-up to extend their useful bandwidth. In designs like these you are forced to listen to break-up because you don't have a choice if you want to use a single driver system, or a system that crosses high to the tweeter.



Quote:
Originally Posted by upking View Post
Another question, should I consider the on axis curve while calculating the crossover value or the others?
It depends on what axis you're intending on listening to them. Generally speaking though people design to the axis that the loudspeakers will be listened at. This is usually close to being on axis and if designed correctly the off axis curves will also be suitably flat.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RockLeeEV View Post
soft poly cones are fools gold.
At first glances it would appear that SB have chosen a poly mix that isn't super soft.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RockLeeEV View Post
Well I guess.that's what Accutons are!!
I guess I'd like to mess with Accuton cones on Scanspeak motors :P Most of Accutons motors are a step down from what Scan can supply. The 6.5" metal coned illuminators look fantastic on paper, save for the ridiculous cost. It'd be nice if scan made a 5" metal illuminator, more focused at midrange performance, but I can't see that happening, I don't think Scan have ever done metal coned midrange driver?
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz!
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
4 versions of a 4 way speaker. Which to choose?? Eftegarie Multi-Way 8 28th February 2012 12:14 AM
What speaker should I choose for this setup?? cranks Subwoofers 13 6th August 2011 02:38 AM
Going crazy trying to choose a speaker enclosure! mrbubbs Full Range 15 6th May 2009 08:04 PM
Pls help a noob choose which speaker kit to buy holdenkicks Multi-Way 6 9th February 2005 11:04 AM
Choose speaker based on amp? Slowbot Car Audio 1 14th July 2003 10:34 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:32 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2