Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th February 2004, 07:26 PM   #21
indoubt is offline indoubt  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
indoubt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sweet lake city
Keep up the good works! its worth it

Adn I know that from experience
__________________
better be indoubt untill you're sure
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2004, 11:45 AM   #22
diyAudio Member
 
5th element's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England
With regards to the over point Id say you were about rite with your choice. The seas drivers distortion increases around 3-5k, you want to avoid this.

It is benign however and even when fully included, ie you cross after the distortion, it doesnt produce any nasty effects. IMO it can be heard when removed, or should that be not heard???

This is withe xperience with the W15, it undoubtledly sounded better crossed over at 2k rather then 3.5k even though this is a rather large difference, id still recommend lower the higher.

Mine is crossed to a SS97, which is a few steps above the 93 in terms of everything and again IMO matches the SEAS much better.

As the W12 is better in quality then the 93, dont get the wrong the 93 is fantastic if its anything like the 95, but the W12 is better, so naturally you would want to cross higher to give more of the audio spectrum to the better driver, but its gonna be a balancing act between distortion and driver.

Other then that you have got the ingredients to a killer mini loudspeaker, I hope it works out.
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack!
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2004, 07:50 PM   #23
gary f is offline gary f  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
gary f's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Quebec city
Default Crossover point

Thanks for advice 5th Element

The crossover point is one of my main concern. One thing is sure, I want to supress the cone resonances good AND I want a low order electrical crossover (2nd order max). From early simulations, with two LC notch filters in paralel with the driver and a single inductance, i think i can get good results (almost 3rd order acoustical) but it works better with a low Xover point of 2000 Hz.

I think I could also do a 2nr order electrical with 2 notch filter and raise the Xover point to 2500 but I really dont want to go higher since the distorsion increase and the resonance peaks may be audible...
F
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2004, 10:26 PM   #24
diyAudio Member
 
5th element's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England
With reagards to the res peaks, if you have them well sorted with notch filters you WONT hear them whatever you do with the other bit of the xover ie filter slope frequency etc. This is when you use a DSP filter to remove the peak, so it may be a little different with passive xovers.

Im refering to using the driver without any crossover here just full range. If you run it full range it sounds unnatural, I actually think they sound quite good including the peak, but unnatural. Applying the notch filter to the driver working full range made it sound like every other driver you have heard without a xover. Only better because there is no cone break up, which usually makes other drivers sound crap without an xover as the breakup makes the sound, ragged and unrefined.

I think the Seas are really good actually. im a big fan

As long as you have access to measurement software there will be glorious sounds eminating from your listening rooms.! Even without there will be very good sounds produced
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack!
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2004, 08:56 PM   #25
gary f is offline gary f  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
gary f's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Quebec city
Default This is what it's gonna look like

It begin to look like the real thing...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mini-dcp_4345.jpg (23.7 KB, 564 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2004, 09:16 PM   #26
Guss is offline Guss  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Guss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Montreal
This is really sweet, tell me when theyre finished I want to hear them :P
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2004, 01:22 PM   #27
gary f is offline gary f  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
gary f's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Quebec city
Default DONE!

I finished the enclosures last weekend after a 20 hours sprint. Everything turned out to be really nice. I have designed a first filter using manufacturer curves and calsod to be able to listen to them quickly. I used cheap quality parts. I will make measurements in the next few days and design better filters with good quality parts later.

F
Attached Images
File Type: jpg petit iso.jpg (28.8 KB, 430 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2004, 01:30 PM   #28
gary f is offline gary f  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
gary f's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Quebec city
The sound is really good right from the start, but i feel that it could be better. It is normal considering the low quality parts used for the filters (electrolytic caps, dayton resistors, Solen caps for the tweeter which are OK i guess but not great, etc) Measurements will also be useful as i don't like to rely on manufacturer measurements. Bass is surprising for a small speaker and the most striking detail is the low distorsion. It is really clear on vocals and instruments like saxophone. But there is still lot of place for improvement. Crossover design is the hard part...but it may be fun.
F
Attached Images
File Type: jpg petit rearview.jpg (23.2 KB, 399 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2004, 12:16 AM   #29
J2JD is offline J2JD  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
WOW. Congratulations, that really is impressive!
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2004, 03:45 AM   #30
navin is offline navin  India
diyAudio Member
 
navin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mumbai (Bombay), India
Send a message via MSN to navin Send a message via Yahoo to navin
fantastic. i better NOT post pics of my speakers they look horrible ametureish compared to this.
__________________
...still looking for the holy grail.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Accuton Mini Monitor stvnharr Multi-Way 1 28th March 2009 10:04 AM
Need recomendation for a 4in. mini monitor andy2 Multi-Way 3 16th November 2005 11:20 PM
JGs Mini Monitor - additional questions Benny the 2. Multi-Way 9 13th May 2005 12:27 PM
The A4 monitor, best mini monitor? KURT Multi-Way 5 26th April 2005 01:34 PM
Mini Monitor using Vifa drivers... nrgy Multi-Way 5 4th September 2004 11:37 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:37 AM.

Page generated in 0.10357 seconds (78.75% PHP - 21.25% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio