Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th August 2012, 09:09 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: London
Default Monacor HT-22

I know it is a bit of a minority interest, but a few of us favour cone tweeters. I like the sound of full range units, and find that a cone tweeter is the best way to emulate this sound, and give the benefit of flexibility and treble extension. I have seen one or two threads on the subject of cone tweeters, but I can find no reference to the one I use; the Monacor HP-22. (with a Monacor 135 AD, in a 8 litre aperiodic box, with a 3.3uF cap.). I consider it to be a really good quality tweeter, that is ridiculously cheap (£4.38). But don't take my word for it, this is what Klang+ Tom say:

"The unit at the most favourable price was the surprise in the test......provides the most balanced frequency response in front of the microphone.....very attractive price, to be used without any problems, offers best measured values."

Has anyone else used these?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2012, 11:18 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
KaffiMann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
I can only find the HT-22, goes to 15khz, where can you find the HP one?
__________________
Theory and practice.....
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2012, 12:35 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: London
Sorry, my typing error; that should have been HT-22. Although it only goes up to 15k, it is very incisive. I am not made too aware of the missing 1/3rd octave.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th August 2012, 09:23 PM   #4
system7 is offline system7  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
system7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
I'd like to hear more about this Monacor polycone SPH 135/AD and HT-22 cone tweeter setup of yours on first order crosover, midrange, otherwise I wonder what you are saying here.

Quote:
Atkinson: You say that you think a cone tweeter might be a better way of going about it?

Marshall: Yes I do. Because when a dome goes into breakup, it's utterly, totally finished. Uncontrollable. That's it. There's nothing more to be had. When a cone goes into breakup, all that's happening, providing you can control it, is that the radiating area is diminishing. It's much easier to control that. There's a lot of work to do, of course. I wouldn't like to say that you can just take a sheet of paper and design a cone tweeter which is going to be a world-beater. But I'm sure there's a lot of scope. I shouldn't say this, should I? I should just go out and do it.
Robin Marshall: A Modicum of Genius Page 4 | Stereophile.com

I didn't really like what I saw with the Visaton TW-70 cone tweeter on single capacitor, but the 92mm monacor unit has a commendably better and flatter response and may open up more possibilities. So tell us more. I thank you.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Monacor_HT-22_Picture.JPG (28.4 KB, 89 views)
File Type: jpg Monacor_HT-22_Frequency_Response.JPG (36.2 KB, 89 views)
File Type: jpg Monacor_HT-22_Dimensions.JPG (23.0 KB, 89 views)
__________________
Good Night, and Good Luck. Best regards from Steve in Portsmouth, UK.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2012, 10:43 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: London
Hi Steve

Thanks for the link to that article, which I found fascinating. I use Mordaunt Short MS10 classics as my reference speakers, which have a huge Robin Marshall influence in their design (they are almost indistinguishable from Epos speakers)

My speakers started out based on the original Kef Coda in size and shape,( I had a pair of Kef T27s to play with). Wilmslow Audio recommend the Monacor SPH 135 AD as a replacement for the Kef B110, so I thought it would be dead easy. But T27 is much less efficient than the 135 AD. I have a very low powered amp, and rather than cut the output of the 135AD I looked for a tweeter of around 90dB output, and I had the HT-22s to hand and used them. I was startled at how good the combination sounded.

I have tweaked the design a lot and ended up with the following: The Coda box is 9'' wide and 6" deep (approx) and I use it against a rear wall, and angled in. This wide baffle and shallow box near a wall alleviates the baffle step problem. I have ended up with the 135AD running full range; (I would not claim that a proper xover would not be better). I tried various caps on the HT-22 and ended up with 3.3uF as my preferred value. The box has a sub baffle of 12mm mdf with a large oval cutout for the 2 drivers, and a baffle of 12mm plywood screwed to it with 10 screws. This makes toying with xover values and wadding much easier.

The "wadding" is fairly minimal. A thick layer of carpet on the back panel and on the bottom, nothing on the sides. (this is not panel damping). Then I have some weird tweaks; feel free to laugh, but they cost nothing. Between the drivers I have a horizontal strip of thin wood (card is ok for trying out) about 16cm long and 2cm wide about 0.5cm away from the baffle. I use a couple of blobs of blutak for this spcing. This seems to reduce the blur between the drivers. Then I have a piece of thin card about 4 cm deep and 9cm long vertically mounted at right angles to the frame of the HT-22 (no gap). This seems to give more presence. Both seem to improve stereo imaging.

Oh, the aperiodic loading is probably not that at all. But I tried drilling small holes near the corners of the baffle (where I reasoned the pressure was greatest) and tried blutaking various combinations closed and ended up with almost none; one 4mm hole (24mm deep) at a top corner and one 4mm hole at an opposite bottom corner. I felt that these gave a freer bass. I do cheat and have a REL Quake sub-woofer coming in at about 60 Hz (difficult to tell) for low bass.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2012, 12:06 PM   #6
system7 is offline system7  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
system7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
I found some relevance in the Robin Marshall interview too. As well as Mordaunt Short, he also designed the Monitor Audio R252, which is the predecessor of my R300/MD speakers. Happens I've got some Mordaunt Short MS10i style 5" polycone woofers lying about awaiting inspiration too.

We've had a thread going on LS3/5a mini monitor clones lately, and folks have been looking at the Monacor SPH-135/AD as a possible cheap driver. Problem is deciding on the bass notch required with a higher order filter. In fact 1.5kHz seems right according to THIS THREAD.

Monacor SPH135/AD Qts of 0.37 and Vas of 26L is saying 10L closed box to me, and bigger for aperiodic(damped reflex) and reflex. Certainly 5L is on the boomy smallish side for this driver.

What you have done is probably keep the impedance valve friendly with your minimal filtering and aperiodic box along with high efficiency as noted. All in all, very interesting, though I suspect the cone breakup from the bass unit would annoy me. I'd suspect you've got to know what is good about cone tweeters to appreciate them despite their poorer dispersion. It's going to be a lack of spit and sizzle compared to a soft dome. Perhaps less sibilance?

Include my usual heap of pictures of the 5" polycone Monacor bass unit and also some KEF Coda stuff complete with notch for the interested folks.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Monacor_SPH_135_AD_Picture.JPG (26.2 KB, 72 views)
File Type: jpg Monacor_SPH-135-AD_Fequency_Response.JPG (59.4 KB, 71 views)
File Type: jpg Monacor_SPH-135-AD_TrialFilter.JPG (37.5 KB, 15 views)
File Type: jpg KEF_Coda.JPG (43.3 KB, 16 views)
File Type: jpg KEF-B110-SP1003-T27_Kit_Crossover.JPG (50.5 KB, 14 views)
__________________
Good Night, and Good Luck. Best regards from Steve in Portsmouth, UK.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2012, 03:23 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: London
Although Monacor advise a 10 litre box for a closed box loading with their 135 AD, this is for an system Q of 0.7. Whilst this is theoretically ideal, very few designers use it for a speaker of this size. Somewhere between .8 and 1.0 is more normal.

Because the speaker is against a rear wall, I consider the "poorer" dispersion an advantage for my design.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2012, 04:01 PM   #8
system7 is offline system7  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
system7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Can I go off-topic for a moment and ask you if you know what the impedance of the bass unit in the MS10 was? Reason being the ones out of the MS821C centre speaker are 3.5 ohms nominal wired in series. Haven't measured the second order crossover coils yet, but it's fairly standard 3.2uF treble capacitor and 45uF bass capacitor which I think I can rejig for single drive units.

IIRC, the MS10i was a single coil bass tilt and 2.2uF tweeter filter capacitor with 50 ohm resistor shunted across the tweeter.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Mordaunt_Short_MS821C_Front.jpg (91.4 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg Mordaunt_Short_MS821C.jpg (97.2 KB, 12 views)
File Type: jpg Mordaunt_Short_MS821C_Crossover.jpg (87.3 KB, 14 views)
__________________
Good Night, and Good Luck. Best regards from Steve in Portsmouth, UK.

Last edited by system7; 13th August 2012 at 04:07 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2012, 04:29 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
mondogenerator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: City Of Villans
Blog Entries: 1
i initally considered that monacor tweeter, when i was looking for a cheap modern cone tweeter. I ended up with the visaton FRS5X which im happy with. They cost £6, so also very cheap. The 'whoops' in the response of the monacor were a little problem for me, and at the time i thought it may have cone resonance issues. Maybe crackpot theory, but i didnt opt for them in the end. The FRS5X was also very cheap, and their response is flatter thru the most critical frequencies. System7, i believe you were interested in them too? Did you manage to buy any? The TW70 is also another worth trying (i havent, since i hoped to avoid a 3rd order network). I do wish i could find the motorola 3 inch piezo cone tweeters that Maplin used to stock, back in my youth. I reckon that now i know alot more about crossovers for piezos, that theyd be almost as good as youre likely to find. Great tweeters, at the time i lacked the knowhow to get the best from them.
__________________
It still amazes me every time I get something right

Last edited by mondogenerator; 13th August 2012 at 04:32 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2012, 05:23 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: London
The MS10i classic is rated as 8 ohm and the main drive unit just has a single coil in series with it which suggests to me a first order crossover and a 8 ohm drive unit.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
22+22 transformer thetube0a3 Chip Amps 173 13th March 2010 08:35 AM
For Sale: Goldpoint SA4 HT passive preamp with HT bypass Face Swap Meet 0 22nd January 2010 02:00 PM
monacor goran14 Multi-Way 2 20th April 2005 02:12 PM
Monacor sph-380tc music and ht sub wingman Multi-Way 14 2nd August 2004 03:57 AM
HT without a HT receiver paulspencer Digital Source 28 12th December 2003 08:29 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:47 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 27.27%)
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio