|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: somewhere in Mandaluyong
|
plugged some figures in Unibox and came out with this graph for a vented enclosure:
__________________
forever dreaming of a better set-up... |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
You have two Tang Band 4 inchers in a ridiculously large enclosure, tuned far too high. That is why you have the huge peak just before cutoff.
Since there are 28.3 Liters in 1 Ft³, this enclosure is 5.3 Ft³! That is big enough to fit a 15 incher into, instead of two 4 inchers. I suggest either a sealed box with 13 Liters, or a ported box with 19 liters tuned to 50 Hz. See if the dark blue line doesn't look better. That is, a flat line all the way down, untiil it turns downward for the cutoff.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: somewhere in Mandaluyong
|
i tried to change the volume in Unibox... didn't know that I could do that
anyway, the graph looked much better... is this basically the shape that one has to achieve whenever designing vented or sealed enclosure?
__________________
forever dreaming of a better set-up... |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
just another
diyAudio Moderator
|
That looks much better. I usually play around for a while until I get something pretty flat, with as low a 3db point as possible without compromising the flatness too much. It's interesting to change things like the port length, or box volume, just to see how it afects things.
Have fun Regards, Tony. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
|
Don't forget that appropriately coloured red line cutting through the graph! This show that the drivers have reached max linear excursion (xmax) at ~175Hz. So at 80w input, flattening out the bottom octaves by changing box volume, tuning etc. makes no difference.
Alter the power handling figure until you find a point where the red line does not intersect with the black line within the required range (or using the second Unibox graph might be easier - peak cone excursion graph).
__________________
"The human mind is so constituted that it colours with its own previous conceptions any new notion that presents itself for acceptance." - J. Wilhelm. (But I still think mine sounds better than yours.) |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: somewhere in Mandaluyong
|
thanks for the info... i'll try to modify some of the figures later
__________________
forever dreaming of a better set-up... |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| interpreting max. values listed in datasheet | kathodyne | Tubes / Valves | 7 | 4th July 2008 06:49 PM |
| Preamp help – Interpreting the results. | GeeVee | Solid State | 16 | 10th January 2008 12:05 PM |
| Interpreting SOA graph for IRF640/9640 | steevo | Solid State | 1 | 26th April 2007 07:45 PM |
| Interpreting R-Theta's HS ratings? | dantwomey | Pass Labs | 5 | 11th November 2002 03:30 PM |
| Interpreting Electronics Schematics | Super | Everything Else | 39 | 22nd September 2001 03:53 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08620 seconds (75.51% PHP - 24.49% MySQL) with 11 queries |