Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22nd May 2012, 04:15 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Default Baffle Step Correction & Speaker Efficiency

I've found that different BSC filter simulators model the BS effect as either a loss or gain. Jeff Bagby's worksheet has an option to do either. I assume that modeling the BS effect as a loss is most accurate? For my baffle geometry, and modeling BS effect as a loss, Jeff's worksheet gives me a small 1.5 db increase between 700 Hz and 2000 Hz, then tails off to a -6 db loss at 10 Hz.

I'm designing a 3-way system with a Usher 8945a driver, with an average 87 db/w/m sensitivity. At 100 Hz, the -5 db baffle effect lowers the sensitive to around 82 db. Adding in a low-frequency boost from a port, and from a small peak in the crossover filter, the model gets ~83.5 db sensitivity from the Usher, after box, baffle and crossover effects.

In order to get a flat response, I'm having to put some pretty large resistors on the mid-range and tweeters, bringing their sensitivities down from 90 and 91 db respectively to the 83.5 db of the Usher.

Is this a reasonable approach? Do I really want to be so heavy handed with the resistors in accounting for the baffle step? Is 83 db a reasonable efficiency for the speaker as a whole?

Thanks for the help
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd May 2012, 05:22 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
speaker dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Mountain, Framingham
Its all a bit relative and depends on your starting point. I like to think of 2 pi as the more "normal" situation, primarily because Thiele/Small calculations will be based on 2pi conditions and then 2pi to 4 pi correction would give the final response in a free field but with the nominal baffle of the cabinet. Simple models apply to 2 pi but diffraction related response must be considered for 4 pi.

83.5 is pretty low with most commercial sytems falling in the 87 +-2 dB range. You can take a philosophical view on whether you must drop the whole system to the lowest 4pi point. Know that you will get some room gain and some boundary effect at low frequency from the floor and walls, even if some feet away. You can always split the difference, aim for 85-86 and fine tune the sound by proximity to the rear wall. The variablility of room acoustics will make more precision than that a bit unjustified.

Do you have tone controls? Keeping the midrange sensitivity up and giving some bass boost is an equally valid approach.

Regards,
David S.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quick baffle step correction question. digits Multi-Way 46 13th October 2011 05:14 AM
question about baffle step correction kennyhorn Full Range 2 20th November 2010 06:43 PM
Modeling a Baffle Step Correction Circuit Seadweller Full Range 4 28th December 2007 09:51 PM
Baffle step correction circuit - how to design? mr_push_pull Multi-Way 28 9th November 2004 08:27 PM
baffle step correction and bypassing it xcortes Multi-Way 11 9th May 2004 04:14 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:28 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2