Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th May 2012, 04:24 PM   #1
Einric is offline Einric  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bozeman, MT
Default extreme cone movement

I have recently built a pair of Dayton DA175 two way speakers.
They are BR in.9 cuft tuned to 33hz.
Even at relatively low volume the woofers move A LOT.
They still sound fine but it still concerns me.
What would cause this.
I am on a commercial HT amp with high pass @ 100hz.
Even when I set the High Pass to 200hz I still see great cone movement with explosions.
I have never noticed this with the other two sets of speakers I have attached to this receiver over the past 10 years.

I have heard great things about this woofer and I find it hard to believe that it is the woofers fault.
I am in the process of finding leaks in the boxes that might cause the box to be "Larger" than it is.
This woofer needs 1.9 cuft on the simulations.
Is it possible that there is a resonant in the box that messes with it's excursion or something?
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2012, 04:48 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: England
all i can think is that when you play an explosion sound it has content way below your tuning frequency.

with a reflex port all frequancys, from a few hz down from your tuning of 33hz, cause the woofer to act as if it was in free space.

try shoving something in the port and see if it is the same

you may need a subsonic filter, i have no experiance of reflex boxes, i dont know weather in real life situations the boxes are easly unloaded r not.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2012, 05:27 PM   #3
Einric is offline Einric  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bozeman, MT
If I plug the port completely the excursion is limited and the bass is definitely tighter.
The HT Receiver has a 100, 150 or 200hz filter on it to cross the mains to the sub.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2012, 05:43 PM   #4
Einric is offline Einric  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bozeman, MT
Is it possible that this is the first speaker I have had that has a woofer that "wants" to try and reproduce subsonic and has the means to do so.
All my other speakers have been commercial woofers 5.25"-6.5" with inflated low extension (I'm sure).
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2012, 07:33 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
5th element's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England
Generally the more capable a woofer is of reproducing low frequencies, the less it has to move to reproduce them.

I am very surprised that a high pass of even 100Hz (which is normally 2nd order) isn't enough to stomp out excessive excursions at low frequencies. It makes me wonder if the filter is faulty or if something else somewhere is amiss.
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack!
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2012, 07:35 PM   #6
Einric is offline Einric  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bozeman, MT
OK, I think I have solved the mystery.
At 12 WRMS @ 32hz tuning in 1 cuft this woofer exceeds rated Xmax @ 50hz & down.
It all makes sense now.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2012, 01:21 PM   #7
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5th element View Post
Generally the more capable a woofer is of reproducing low
frequencies, the less it has to move to reproduce them.
Hi,

Don't know what your trying to say. In fact the less capable a speaker
is of reproducing low bass, e.g. due to high driver Fs, the less it will
move, and consequently it will handle more low bass power.

the DA175 in 1 cuft vented to 32Hz will have pretty impressive bass
extension albeit at a modest level due to excursion limitations. Bass
power handling is 10W or so, good full range for a 30-50W amplifier.

For high pased HT use I'd say 0.5cuft sealed would probably be better.

rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2012, 01:56 PM   #8
Einric is offline Einric  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bozeman, MT
Yes I was thinking about sealed .5 cuft.
I wanted a little more low end for stereo listening though so I went with 1 cuft BR.
I finally hooked up my EQ and experimented with the subsonic filter.
The woofers are well behaved now, I have tuned the EQ to enhance the low bass and with the subsonic on I don't have wild cone movement anymore.

My amp is a 120W Class H+ Panasonic, it has plenty of power to drive the speakers to destruction.
Unfortunately the EQ can only be in the loop with analog sources.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2012, 02:22 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
5th element's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England
Quote:
Originally Posted by sreten View Post
Hi,

Don't know what your trying to say.
It was a generalisation that when you go up in driver size, for a given average hifi type sensitivity, in a standard ported box, that the overall excursion for a given frequency would go down. This was aimed at the point that the OP thought, because his cones were flapping a lot, that he had a system that was now more capable of reproducing low low bass, where all that's likely to be happening is the driver is unloading with HT booms. Maybe it was too much of generalisation.
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack!
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2012, 04:14 PM   #10
Einric is offline Einric  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bozeman, MT
5th.....Nailed It

Now with the Subsonic Filter the over excursion problems are gone.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is cone movement only proportional with Sd? Defo Multi-Way 3 13th August 2010 09:49 AM
Excessive FE206E cone movement wixy Full Range 6 5th June 2008 05:01 PM
Gross loudspeaker cone movement when using tube amps. colinB Tubes / Valves 41 10th July 2007 10:19 PM
Cone movement vs. frequency Nichol1997 Subwoofers 35 28th November 2006 09:42 AM
help! Dc cone movement while volume adjust. mikee12345 Multi-Way 9 24th June 2003 02:24 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:03 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 27.27%)
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio