Round vs. camber. Two issues, you pick. Camber will have a sharp edge that is libel to produce refraction. Round over a bit more restrictive so if you expect really large cone excursions, maybe an issue.
I camber, then hit it with a flapper disk and smooth everything out trying for a horn-like profile.
I camber, then hit it with a flapper disk and smooth everything out trying for a horn-like profile.
It's CHAMFER not camber, champher, or camfer!
Champher & camber are both correct, chamfer would be an americanization of champher.
dave
With the baffles, is there any minuses using 2x18mm mdf, instead of one piece 36mm?
I know it's hard to find large thickness mdf, the thickest I can find locally is 32mm.
But the suppliers can glue two thickness's together for me.
ps I did chamfer a 45 deg camber for woofer in a 25mm baffle
I know it's hard to find large thickness mdf, the thickest I can find locally is 32mm.
But the suppliers can glue two thickness's together for me.
ps I did chamfer a 45 deg camber for woofer in a 25mm baffle
This raises an interesting question about how thick is the "ideal" baffle?
While thick is more stable, a big right angle wall close to the speaker cone can’t be good for clearing the sound waves.
Reccessing the drivers helps because it reduces the baffle thickness, but I wonder if there is some kind of formula to be applied.
While thick is more stable, a big right angle wall close to the speaker cone can’t be good for clearing the sound waves.
Reccessing the drivers helps because it reduces the baffle thickness, but I wonder if there is some kind of formula to be applied.
Depends on many other variables. How much stiffness does the basket provide? Is it rigid to the baffle or compliant coupled, where the cutout is, what is the depth of the cone, and on and on and on. It is a design issue, no simple answer.
I would not call the problem "clearing the sound waves" It is more like reducing reflections.
I would not call the problem "clearing the sound waves" It is more like reducing reflections.
This raises an interesting question about how thick is the "ideal" baffle?
Thin & stiff. And not completely straightforward as TVR suggests. A subbaffle of aluminum is a good solution.
dave
I have actually used a ceramic plate epoxied between plywood and MDF for a sealed sub cabinet. Very effective. Multiple materials are good for anti-resonant. Tile very stiff. Wood very low Q. No one said making a good speaker was easy. One of these days I will make one with the tile the exposed front. Routing the recess will be the challenge.
For a monitor, using plastic laminate or aluminum skin on both side adds tremendous rigidity to allow a thinner panel. Heck, even the melamine skin for cheap shelves adds strength.
For a monitor, using plastic laminate or aluminum skin on both side adds tremendous rigidity to allow a thinner panel. Heck, even the melamine skin for cheap shelves adds strength.
we just built a test mule for push-push SDX10. All 15mm BB. I'm curious as to how effective the push-push really is at reducing box load. After the test, we will add a skin of 18mm to the baffles (at a minimum) to flush mount the drivers.
dave
Dave will hopefully be installing drivers (which by my estimate will have more mass than the initial boxes)
I've just finished routing my baffles (2x18mm) for my ZRT 2.5 way sealed.
Should I do a 45" camfer around the the woofer, or can I just use the same 1/2" rounding bit as i'll use on my baffle edges?
Hi,
Built the vented versions and they are still here. The designer says yes. I would do the 45 degree. Ace Hardware has a bit for less than USD 10.
Post more pictures.
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.2198606537629.119347.1621248869&type=3&l=6334890e9d
P
Last edited:
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Baffle 36mm thick, do i need to chamfer?