|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cheltenham
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: hobart tasmania
|
Hi Fatmarley
Decibels per octave is the usual measure of crossover rolloff, which in case of your very nice graphs indicates that the woofer rolloff is approx 18db per octave, and tweeter approx 12db per octave. An octave is a doubling of frequency. Cheers / Chris |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cheltenham
|
Hi Chris,
Thank's for replying. I still don't understand how to work it out though ![]() I can see what a what a decibel is and an octave, but i'm not sure how you work out what the slope is. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: hobart tasmania
|
Look between two frequencies that contain the active region for both woofer and tweeter ( relative to your graph the third line in from 1000 ) from 2000 to 3000 hz which is an octave ( a doubling of frequency ) and then compare to the decibels on the left hand side,
Cheers / Chris |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cheltenham
|
I'm still obviously doing it wrong, because the woofer looks like 12db per octave and the tweeter about 6db !!!
When I get a chance i'll put the picture in window paint and draw where i'm measuring from. I feel like a right plonker... |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: sydney
|
I might be able to help on this
From the graph it looks like 2500Hz on -14db start on crossover so 1 octave would be 5000Hz. At 5000Hz it's at -28db so 14db per octave. Take into account the frequency of the woofer at 5kHz without crossover. The woofer probably has a spike in sensitivity in the higher order frequencies.
__________________
Indecision makes the world gone round. Maybe |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cheltenham
|
It looks like -26db at 5000Hz to me (sorry for being pedantic)
So assuming I am right (2nd order acoustic on woofer and first order on tweeter) - Hows that supposed to effect the sound/phase etc ? Would I be better off trying to change the tweeter to second order, to match the woofer ? Does anyone care ? Are people put off helping because of my user name (fatmarley) ? Perhaps I smell ? Are you supposed to leave a gap between the last letter in a sentence and the question mark ? Am I drunk or just a bit silly/tired/bored ? So many questions and so few answers... |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: sydney
|
hmm could be -26db needed my glasses.
do you have the graphs/datasheet for the drivers you are using? IMHO I would leave the crossover as it is, looks fairly flat at crossover. Isn't that what your looking for? (ps no space after word for ? mark)
__________________
Indecision makes the world gone round. Maybe |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Looks like 1st order electrical on the tweeter. Notice the -12dB from 6K down to 1.5K (2 octaves where the tweeter is probably naturally closer to flat), then it turns steeper when the natural rolloff of the tweeter kicks in, increasing the rolloff to something like 12dB/octave accoustic.
The woofer appears to me to be on either a 2nd or 3rd order electrical, I would have to see the response of the woofer without the network in place to know for sure. Either way it looks like a well thought out x-over for the drivers. Measurement confirms the BSC is close to ideal. |
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
|
Quote:
Select a crossover target curve. There'll all sorts of options: type; crossover frequency; slope; Q; etc. Try a few and see which matches what you've got. Start with the standard types (Butterworth, Bessel, Linkwitz-Riley, etc.). Easiest would be to identify the slope or closest slope. Then tweak the crossover frequency to bring it closer to your own. Then play with the types to find which transition area (i.e., the area between flat and the slope) matches yours. If, after this, you don't yet have a perfect match, it means that your crossover is not one of the standard types, and you may then have to use a custom option to get the target to match your crossover. But in this case it becomes a more complex description (as opposed to, say, 2nd order Butterworth).
__________________
Shaun Onverwacht |||||||||| DON'T PANIC |||||||||| |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Crossover Optimization.........what of type component swap boards do you use? | Gavinator68 | Multi-Way | 13 | 23rd October 2011 10:48 PM |
| Klipsch type E balancing network (crossover) pair | jmillerdoc | Swap Meet | 0 | 3rd June 2011 03:20 AM |
| Snell Type 1 Crossover Rebuild | lt_texan | Multi-Way | 31 | 22nd January 2011 11:44 PM |
| Least Audible Midrange Crossover Type? | cuibono | Multi-Way | 67 | 12th September 2010 08:37 PM |
| Capacitor type for crossover | ThSpeakerDude88 | Multi-Way | 23 | 4th August 2007 09:00 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |