Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th March 2012, 09:50 AM   #11
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Switzerland
Not sure what you're expecting. There's a complex interaction of recorded space, reproduction space and reproduction technique. Our understanding of that interaction is rudimentary. Without a better understanding of this interaction, your question about directivity becomes arbitrary and is nothing more than the result of a certain school of thought.
__________________
Markus
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2012, 09:53 AM   #12
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sweden, Blekinge
Send a message via ICQ to EngelholmAudio
Quote:
Originally Posted by markus76 View Post
Not sure what you're expecting. There's a complex interaction of recorded space, reproduction space and reproduction technique. Our understanding of that interaction is rudimentary. Without a better understanding of this interaction, your question about directivity becomes arbitrary and is nothing more than the result of a certain school of thought.
Apart from the unpolite stuff: what do you propose?
__________________
best regards Engelholm Audio
www.engelholmaudio.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2012, 10:14 AM   #13
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Switzerland
Quote:
Originally Posted by EngelholmAudio View Post
Apart from the unpolite stuff: what do you propose?
If stating the truth is impolite to you then be it. Apart from that my proposal is: we need to gain much more knowledge.
__________________
Markus
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2012, 12:25 PM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sweden, Blekinge
Send a message via ICQ to EngelholmAudio
Quote:
Originally Posted by markus76 View Post
If stating the truth is impolite to you then be it. Apart from that my proposal is: we need to gain much more knowledge.
The truth is neve impolite, but phrasings can be.

So thanks for your input to this thread. You're welcome to stop while I encurage other participants to join.
__________________
best regards Engelholm Audio
www.engelholmaudio.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2012, 12:35 PM   #15
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
"Next one please ........ !!!"

...sorry, but couldn't resist ;-)

Regards

Charles
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2012, 01:18 PM   #16
gedlee is offline gedlee  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by EngelholmAudio View Post
Not all speakers have a listening height leveled tweeter/midrange. Should the loob point at the listening position? If not, should it be positivly or negativly phase shifted? How much?
I design the crossover lobes such that the nuls are equaly spaced up and down. This yields the widest vertical height before one enters this nul as a listener.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2012, 01:23 PM   #17
gedlee is offline gedlee  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by markus76 View Post
If direct sound is all that counts, yes, but is direct sound the whole story? In a free field, yes, but we tend to listen to speakers in rooms. So we first would need to answer the question "how do we perceive sound in an enclosed spaces?". There's not much we know about it.
Markus
Considering second oder effects, yes their will be an effect on the power response due to the vertical lobes and this is likely to be audible. To what extent depends on a lot of factors, mostly having to do with the room. If the floor and ceiling are fairly well absorbing, but the side walls are all highly reflective (as I suggest and do in my designs) then this issue is minimized - I would say to the point of being insignificant. Other rooms will differ in this regard.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2012, 01:30 PM   #18
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sweden, Blekinge
Send a message via ICQ to EngelholmAudio
Quote:
Originally Posted by gedlee View Post
I design the crossover lobes such that the nuls are equaly spaced up and down. This yields the widest vertical height before one enters this nul as a listener.
Ok - and at the height of the listener, I assume?

Any consideration to the ceiling reflex? Pardon the swedish, but you'll get it:
Click the image to open in full size.
If you have a null at "Takreflex" (/ceiling reflex) I say it's bad.
__________________
best regards Engelholm Audio
www.engelholmaudio.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2012, 01:31 PM   #19
gedlee is offline gedlee  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by EngelholmAudio View Post
But he says that "the horizontal directivity is much more important" which - in my interpretation - says exactly that it's much more than direct sound.

If I continue interpreting, gedlee says that horisintially originated reflections are more important than vertical ones. If interpreted correctly, I am curious as to why.

Not selldom, my measurements of hifi rooms shows a ceiling reflection absolutly to dominant in magnitude as well as to close in time. This makes me conclude that also vertical directivity is important.
Short explaination: Our ears are horizontal and as such we have very high spatial resolution horizontally. This makes horitonal directivity control critical. There really are no "good" vertical reflections and vertical directivity has little to no influence on imaging.

The vertical reflections can be very degrading and should not be there, which, if you think about has only two solutions. Very narrow vertical directivity (not feasible) or absorb or redirect them (what I do).

Horizontal reflections are critical in that they dominate both the perception of image and spatiousness. They are therefor good (> 15 ms) and bad (< 10 ms.). Controlling this aspect (horizontal directivity) of a loudspeaker thus becomes critical and a central focus of my work.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2012, 01:33 PM   #20
gedlee is offline gedlee  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by EngelholmAudio View Post
Any consideration to the ceiling reflex?
We are typing past each other, but yes, you don't want those reflections. They need to be dealt with somehow.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
On the directivity of dipole tweeters Rudolf Multi-Way 249 31st October 2012 02:03 PM
soft vs hard mid-woofers cones: audible directivity characteristics? crazyhub Multi-Way 43 13th January 2012 09:30 AM
Constant directivity EQ Saurav Multi-Way 11 19th May 2008 02:41 AM
A question on directivity swak Multi-Way 18 31st July 2005 03:03 PM
Open baffles and directivity Yuihb Multi-Way 18 27th February 2004 08:22 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:28 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 27.27%)
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio