Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th April 2012, 04:53 PM   #111
gedlee is offline gedlee  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by WithTarragon View Post
Dr Geddes: you have put yourself on thin ice by commenting on research you actually have not looked at. At the very least look at the figure caption provided by Dr Blauert in his book (yes there is an english translation). You have misunderstood the data that are plotted in that figure. The subsequent discussion has generated quite a bit of misinformation.

In reference to your other thoughts about the possible uniqueness of the median plane, I would encourage you to familarize yourself with the concept of the "cone of confusion".
Don't be condescending.

The median plane is a unique limit of the cone-of-confusion, and yes I knew the concept. The caption under Fig.2.47 in Blauerts book (yes I know that it is in English, I have a copy) says nothing to refute my claim that this data only applies to sources in the median plane. Perhaps this is why it is in the chapter entitled "Evaluating Identical Ear Input Signals", with "One Sound Source" I should add - not very relevent to the current discussion. In fact its not very relavent to sterophony at all.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th April 2012, 05:18 PM   #112
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by gedlee View Post
Don't be condescending.

The median plane is a unique limit of the cone-of-confusion, and yes I knew the concept. The caption under Fig.2.47 in Blauerts book (yes I know that it is in English, I have a copy) says nothing to refute my claim that this data only applies to sources in the median plane. Perhaps this is why it is in the chapter entitled "Evaluating Identical Ear Input Signals", with "One Sound Source" I should add - not very relevent to the current discussion. In fact its not very relavent to sterophony at all.
----------------------------------

I now remember why I don't talk about "work stuff" on an internet forum.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
On the directivity of dipole tweeters Rudolf Multi-Way 249 31st October 2012 02:03 PM
soft vs hard mid-woofers cones: audible directivity characteristics? crazyhub Multi-Way 43 13th January 2012 09:30 AM
Constant directivity EQ Saurav Multi-Way 11 19th May 2008 02:41 AM
A question on directivity swak Multi-Way 18 31st July 2005 03:03 PM
Open baffles and directivity Yuihb Multi-Way 18 27th February 2004 08:22 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:29 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio