|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
|
I was looking at these and they seem to have very positive responses from those who built them. When I look at the freq. response plot below, I see a dip of around 2.5db around the presence region but then a gradual rise approaching high freq. My past experience tells me that with this type of freq. response, the sound although will be clean with very good soundstage, agile, rhythmic, well defined, but sometimes at the expense of midrange fullness especially at the expense of female vocal which will tend to be on the lean side of neutral. What do you guys think?
The speakers seem to be very well designed and given the modest cost, seems like a winner. MiniStatements |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LM1875T freq. response | jamal | Chip Amps | 5 | 23rd November 2010 02:35 PM |
| TL freq response | bigwill | Subwoofers | 6 | 13th July 2005 07:02 PM |
| amp freq response with o-scope | n0plb | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 2nd June 2005 07:40 PM |
| Overall freq. response *that* bad? | Onvinyl | Analogue Source | 7 | 13th April 2005 06:27 PM |
| how to measure freq response | skyraider | Solid State | 23 | 20th January 2004 07:08 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06888 seconds (67.98% PHP - 32.02% MySQL) with 10 queries |