Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22nd January 2012, 10:09 PM   #1
AlexQS is offline AlexQS  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Pacific Northwest
Default Adjusting Pots on the 3 way TL

I realized I was probably doing something wrong. I would adjust the pots so that the mid and tweeter seemed to play the loudest. No adjustments of the two pots seemed to affect the 8" woofer.

After reading some here, I realized that the woofer is probably the least efficient of the 3 speakers present.

I don't have any equipment to measure with.

I turned down the pots so that each speaker played as quietly as possible. I adjusted the midrange up untill it seemed to nicely compliment the woofer, without drowning out the woofers sound.

I played Crosby, Stills, and Nash singing Find the Cost of Freedom. Within that song there is an acapella vocal harmony. This small choir each sing at a different note to produce a chord. While playing this segment, I began to turn up the tweeter. Some voices seemed happier in the midrange, some in the tweeter. I found a nice balance where the voices in the mid, and the voices in the tweeter worked together "the two speakers as one" to make balanced chord of all the voices in the choir.

I think it sounds better. Am I on the right path?

What do the pots do exactly? Am I changing the frequency at which each roll off at? Or am I attenuating the spl level that each speaker plays at?
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2012, 10:55 PM   #2
tvrgeek is offline tvrgeek  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Md
Exactly the correct path.

The pots control how much the tweeter and midrange are reduced in level ( spl) so you can use them to balance in your room. Not frequency. All rooms are so different, there is no absolute correct design.

Those guys are quite talented.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2012, 11:06 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Willamette Valley
Default TL story

You have an old school diy classic there, with the Peerless tweet and Philips mid and bass. Hopefully the L pads are clean, no dead spots or scratchyness. I have a pair of the rubber surround woofers that were doped along with the cone I guess, and they've cracked. Great starting point for crossover tweaks, since the drivers were all good to start with.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2012, 11:20 PM   #4
AlexQS is offline AlexQS  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Pacific Northwest
tvrgeek. Thanks, I am glad to know I'm on the right path.

phivates. You know your stuff. I talked with Dad this weekend. He said that the woofers were Philips. Did you ID them from the photos?

Dad's memory isn't as good on many details anymore. Do you know if the Peerless tweeter you mention is the same as something I saw in a catalog called a Phenolic Ring Tweeter? "Restore your classic system from the 70's, -Modern reproduction of the famous CTS design"
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2012, 02:11 AM   #5
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexQS View Post
Did you ID them from the photos?
photos?

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2012, 02:18 AM   #6
AlexQS is offline AlexQS  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Pacific Northwest
Sorry,... I am linking a couple different posts.

Photo's are here Dave: Reverse Engineer

Thankfully a member showed me (myself a new member) how to post photo's,.. so photo's appear on page two.

Dad upgraded, and moved away to retire, so I have the DIY speakers he built 32 years ago when I was 4 years old. They still sound pretty darn good to me!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2012, 02:29 AM   #7
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Peerless cone tweeter, very good and scarce largely because people are looking for them to refurb their Sonabs. There are some reasonable Japanese tweeters that can be used as subs. The 5ish inch Philips used as the mid is also very good. Is it in its own enclosure. I started my serious building career with those 8" Pilips woofs.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2012, 02:39 AM   #8
AlexQS is offline AlexQS  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Pacific Northwest
Dave,

I have to yet remove the tweets and inspect the inside dimentions. It has been over 20 years since I have seen the inside of the cabinet. I beleive that the mid and tweet are in the same enclosure, and they sit on top of the tall transmission line enclosure which has the woofer at the top. These two inner cabinets combined by a larger outer cabinet surrounding them.

I found the local Portland Oregon shop where the drivers were origionally purchased. Dad says they are very friendly to DIY folks, and will be able to help me find origional drivers if needed. They are JAMAC SPEAKERS // Raw drivers information page

I will post a new thread when I have an objective and goal to plan a center channel to match them.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2012, 06:14 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Willamette Valley
Default Peerless/Philips

Definitely not the phenolic CTS. The Peerless is special. I have two of each size in my Rectilinear III's.

Jamac will help you out. Most of what happened in Portland speaker-wise had a connection to Jim and his nephew Ron has kept it going though things have changed radically in the audio world.

I still have a McGee Radio catalog.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Digital pots, better or worse than analogue pots ? nigelwright7557 Parts 8 25th October 2011 05:10 PM
Sliding Pots vs Circular Pots for an equalizer inverseopamp Digital Line Level 13 27th April 2011 07:31 PM
TAD TL-1601a and TL-1201 Crossover Point manp111 Multi-Way 2 27th September 2010 07:57 PM
What's the difference between a TL, a ML-TL and a TQWT? Bricolo Multi-Way 82 28th August 2008 02:17 PM
Alps pots vs. TKD pots? TKD worth the extra$$? G Tubes / Valves 11 17th August 2004 04:33 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:39 AM.

Page generated in 0.09753 seconds (80.36% PHP - 19.64% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio