|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I realized I was probably doing something wrong. I would adjust the pots so that the mid and tweeter seemed to play the loudest. No adjustments of the two pots seemed to affect the 8" woofer.
After reading some here, I realized that the woofer is probably the least efficient of the 3 speakers present. I don't have any equipment to measure with. I turned down the pots so that each speaker played as quietly as possible. I adjusted the midrange up untill it seemed to nicely compliment the woofer, without drowning out the woofers sound. I played Crosby, Stills, and Nash singing Find the Cost of Freedom. Within that song there is an acapella vocal harmony. This small choir each sing at a different note to produce a chord. While playing this segment, I began to turn up the tweeter. Some voices seemed happier in the midrange, some in the tweeter. I found a nice balance where the voices in the mid, and the voices in the tweeter worked together "the two speakers as one" to make balanced chord of all the voices in the choir. I think it sounds better. Am I on the right path? What do the pots do exactly? Am I changing the frequency at which each roll off at? Or am I attenuating the spl level that each speaker plays at? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Md
|
Exactly the correct path.
The pots control how much the tweeter and midrange are reduced in level ( spl) so you can use them to balance in your room. Not frequency. All rooms are so different, there is no absolute correct design. Those guys are quite talented. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Willamette Valley
|
You have an old school diy classic there, with the Peerless tweet and Philips mid and bass. Hopefully the L pads are clean, no dead spots or scratchyness. I have a pair of the rubber surround woofers that were doped along with the cone I guess, and they've cracked. Great starting point for crossover tweaks, since the drivers were all good to start with.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
tvrgeek. Thanks, I am glad to know I'm on the right path.
phivates. You know your stuff. I talked with Dad this weekend. He said that the woofers were Philips. Did you ID them from the photos? Dad's memory isn't as good on many details anymore. Do you know if the Peerless tweeter you mention is the same as something I saw in a catalog called a Phenolic Ring Tweeter? "Restore your classic system from the 70's, -Modern reproduction of the famous CTS design" |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Sorry,... I am linking a couple different posts.
Photo's are here Dave: Reverse Engineer Thankfully a member showed me (myself a new member) how to post photo's,.. so photo's appear on page two. Dad upgraded, and moved away to retire, so I have the DIY speakers he built 32 years ago when I was 4 years old. They still sound pretty darn good to me!! |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Peerless cone tweeter, very good and scarce largely because people are looking for them to refurb their Sonabs. There are some reasonable Japanese tweeters that can be used as subs. The 5ish inch Philips used as the mid is also very good. Is it in its own enclosure. I started my serious building career with those 8" Pilips woofs.
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Dave,
I have to yet remove the tweets and inspect the inside dimentions. It has been over 20 years since I have seen the inside of the cabinet. I beleive that the mid and tweet are in the same enclosure, and they sit on top of the tall transmission line enclosure which has the woofer at the top. These two inner cabinets combined by a larger outer cabinet surrounding them. I found the local Portland Oregon shop where the drivers were origionally purchased. Dad says they are very friendly to DIY folks, and will be able to help me find origional drivers if needed. They are JAMAC SPEAKERS // Raw drivers information page I will post a new thread when I have an objective and goal to plan a center channel to match them. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Willamette Valley
|
Definitely not the phenolic CTS. The Peerless is special. I have two of each size in my Rectilinear III's.
Jamac will help you out. Most of what happened in Portland speaker-wise had a connection to Jim and his nephew Ron has kept it going though things have changed radically in the audio world. I still have a McGee Radio catalog. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Digital pots, better or worse than analogue pots ? | nigelwright7557 | Parts | 8 | 25th October 2011 05:10 PM |
| Sliding Pots vs Circular Pots for an equalizer | inverseopamp | Digital Line Level | 13 | 27th April 2011 07:31 PM |
| TAD TL-1601a and TL-1201 Crossover Point | manp111 | Multi-Way | 2 | 27th September 2010 07:57 PM |
| What's the difference between a TL, a ML-TL and a TQWT? | Bricolo | Multi-Way | 82 | 28th August 2008 02:17 PM |
| Alps pots vs. TKD pots? TKD worth the extra$$? | G | Tubes / Valves | 11 | 17th August 2004 04:33 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09753 seconds (80.36% PHP - 19.64% MySQL) with 10 queries |