|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
|
Link to kit here
It uses one RS28A tweeter and two RS180S 7" woofers It looks like a good value and I'm pretty close to ordering it .. Both drivers reviewed well by Zaph|Audio however I know the tweeter has twin high peaks, can anyone here comment on the crossover design? Dayton MTM XO.png I'm also interested in the Zaph Audio ZA5.3 MTMs but I liked the Dayton Audio RS722s because they have larger drivers and cabinets .. can anyone help advise me here? They're both very close in price. I appreciate any input greatly, thank you. Last edited by ubel; 18th January 2012 at 09:36 PM. Reason: formatting |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Md
|
RS series drivers are pretty good if well executed in the system. They need to be crossed over pretty low to keep away from their resonance issues. Without doing a full model, the crossover looks suspicious. A fourth order electrical on the tweeter? Metal drivers do like steep crossovers, so they may very well know what they are doing. No filters to deal with any peaks or dips but without measuring it in the box, no clue if any are needed. The 160's were not that easy to use. No idea how it sounds. Could be great. Understand speaker design is not about the sum of the parts, it is all about what you do with them. So it could be terrible. Let us know.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
|
They claim everything including the crossover and cabinet were designed by Dayton Audio in the US .. I'd assume they'd want to back up their own products with a good crossover design.
But again, I don't know if it's a good design or not. I'm tempted to go with the Zaph Audio ZA5.3 MTM because I know it's a professional and tried and true tested design .. the only reason I'm tempted to go with the Dayton's over the Zaphs is because the Daytons have larger drivers and cabs .. someone talk me into something lol. Last edited by ubel; 18th January 2012 at 10:35 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
Also known as : Dr. K's MTM - Speaker Building Project at Parts Express rgds, sreten. Similar to the sort of things Jon March does at Htguide, high order low c/o point stuff.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow Last edited by sreten; 18th January 2012 at 10:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
|
Quote:
Here's indepth info on the crossover design. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Md
|
So get off the forum and buy them!
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
|
Yeah, I think that has convinced me lol. It definitely seems like he knew what he was doing when he designed them and hearing his comments on the crossover design have sold me.
Sadly they only have maple finish in stock ... I'll probably end up getting them because I don't want to wait any longer hehe. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Texas, USA
|
My RS180 MTM Design - Techtalk Speaker Building, Audio, Video, and Electronics Customer Discussion Forum From Parts-Express.com.
Much more elegant crossover. You'll have to build/buy cabs on your own.
__________________
I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
|
Quote:
There is however quite a few and better crossover designs for them here and I believe in time I will upgrade to one of them, probably the Natalie design. Thanks for the input |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi, I have to agree. A fine example of minimal / optimal c/o design, rgds, sreten.
Less is more usually, unless its not enough, seriously applies to crossovers. The above is the one worth trying as an alternative IMO, and the cheapest. You already have 2 of the inductors, so 3 capacitors and one inductor needed.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow Last edited by sreten; 20th January 2012 at 04:14 PM. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Box design for Dayton Audio DCS385-4 15" Classic Sub | Ninesvnsicks | Subwoofers | 96 | 6th March 2012 08:44 AM |
| 3 WAY design WMTM (opinion needed) | sabry | Multi-Way | 28 | 13th August 2010 06:46 AM |
| 3-way studio monitor design opinion? | rhythmdiy | Multi-Way | 3 | 16th October 2007 06:32 AM |
| any opinion on the dayton 7" aluminum woofer | zobsky | Multi-Way | 11 | 21st September 2003 05:50 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12337 seconds (80.05% PHP - 19.95% MySQL) with 11 queries |