|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stockholm
|
I just finished a speaker project but now I am thinking of the next, this time designing myself. I was thinking of a 2.5-way speaker with closed cabinet. This woofer might be a good choice since I want to make a rather cheap speaker: Europe Audio
Then I need to find a good cheap tweeter. My thought was to build a floorstander, narrow and about 1 meter high. This speaker should be compact to use as a TV speaker to avoid those awful built in TV speakers. Closed cabinet to make them easy to place and to build. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stockholm
|
Thanks, I have been looking at those, I will have a look tonight trying to figure out what will suit the woofer best. I have to learn a lot, but from what I know if you use 2 woofers in a 2.5-way you get 3dB more sensitivity so since the woofer is about 88dB sensitivity the tweeter should at least be 88+3=91dB, right?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
While the gain for two drivers running in parallel is 6dB, you are completely forgetting the baffle step effect. This should give you a loss of 6dB at low frequencies, while retaining the nominal sensitivity at high fr. Here Low and High are in terms of the baffle width.
The normal approach of a x.5 design is to completely compensate for this baffle effect, in which one of the woofer runs "full-range" and the other (the .5 woofer) has a 1st order low pass centered at the baffle step frequency. See for example: ZDT3.5 As for the tweeter's choice, using a 6.5" mid-woofer, I'd opt for a tweeter able to be crossed at 2KHz LR4. A Vifa DX25 should be able to do that. For a higher price there are the Seas 27TDFC or 27TBFC/G. Ralf |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stockholm
|
Thanks giralfino, like I said I have some learning to do. I have read somewhere about that way to compensate for the baffle step and my intention is do it like that.
I want a tweeter that is rather cheap but at the same quality level as the woofers. Hope this is possible. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stockholm
|
I think I am choosing between the Vifa DX25 or Seas 27TDFC. Best choice for a simple crossover work? Should be the Seas? What do you think?
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
![]() The resonance at ~5kHz is visable also in the off axis responses and my experience is that one can hear this in some extent. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stockholm
|
Hi EngelholmAudio. Yes I have seen that and maybe it will be problematic. However it should be possible to remove it with the crossover, I think they did that with the "Tarkus", se link above. The woofer is very cheap at the moment at that dealer, maybe because of the problems you mentioned.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Quote:
Ralf |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Newby project idea for HND main project help and advice needed please | WIGANWEZ | Chip Amps | 1 | 17th September 2011 04:59 PM |
| Newby project idea for HND main project help and advice needed please | WIGANWEZ | Chip Amps | 0 | 17th September 2011 01:39 PM |
| CDPRO2 Group Project (open source project) | BrianGT | Digital Source | 147 | 8th August 2008 11:37 AM |
| My OLD Project....... cheap tube audio project!!! | tube-lover | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 8th May 2008 09:26 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10966 seconds (78.62% PHP - 21.38% MySQL) with 10 queries |