|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: indonesia
|
Hello, long time lurker would like to ask help from diyaudio gurus here :
I am trying to replicate a nice mtm center speaker with vifa P13WG-00-08 and D27, main problem is the only pair I can find here are A13WHs with 4 ohm impedance. Assuming both models have exactly similar parameter except for impedance, how do I convert these values in following low pass crossover ? ![]() Really appreciate any help or guidance as I have very little knowledge on electronics. Thanks much in advance. cheers, sm |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi sm,
My gut tells me that you would drop the 0.2mH inductor down to 0.1mH, and then remove the rest of the components because they have no business being there? I'm really hoping someone else can shed some light on the reason those other components are wired in like that. I can't figure out what business they have being there. Is your amp going to be alright with a 2 ohm load with those woofers in parallel? My personal approach would be to wire the woofers in series and use a 0.4mH inductor instead, resulting in a ~8ohm speaker. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Durham, NC
|
That looks like a *really* odd design for a crossover - are you sure about the schematic?
You will want to put the A13WH's in series to get a 8-ohm load. Most HT amps won't drive a 2-ohm load in my experience. This also means that you will likely need to pad the tweeter output down in order to match the woofers. At this point you are really better off throwing out the old design and starting from scratch. Perhaps using one of the simple crossover design tools. Eg. Introduction to designing crossovers without measurement Good luck, -bill
__________________
Bill Rankin Last edited by wrankin; 12th January 2012 at 05:31 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jakarta
|
That filter is just a contour shaper (I think 0.3mH is more proper than 3mH), so basically the P13 is run in fullrange, where the tweeter is crossed at the P13 natural roll-off frequency.
But A13 is a different driver than P13. I think A13 is more a midrange (P13 is more a midwoofer). So even the contour will be different (the above filter will be useless). |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: indonesia
|
Thanks much for all your useful replies and suggestions ! To simplify, let's just assume that there are now two P13WG-04 or 4 ohms drivers with exact parameters (except impedance of course) to replace their 8 ohm brothers.
I'm very curious with resulting 'character' of 8 ohm woofers in parallel, if I could consider them as single 4 ohm driver that should make things easier, correct ? Do you guys think double crossover (one for each 4 ohm drvr) will accomplish the same purpose as original one with parallel 8 ohm drvrs ? [wishful thinking mode] ![]() As for that weird L-C connection, I already triple checked it, since at first I thought it was a zobel network wrongly connected. But it does look like a notch filter. Anyway the big L is actually 3mH (measured it, disconnected from xo) ... and tweeter xo is even more complicated for a 1st order config. Again I really appreciate additional confirmation on above alternative double xo or other conversion ideas. cheers, salim sm -------- From this Vifa model notes, hopefully the difference between A13 and P13 is only limited to basket material : ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: indonesia
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
just another
diyAudio Moderator
|
The 0.2mH 2uF LC circuit forms a high q notch at 7957Hz. This I would think would be a very narrow notch, and will be independent of the impedance of the woofers (ie it will make no difference if it is 4 ohms or 8 ohms) even if there was a 10 ohm resistor in parallel with the L and C, the Q of the filter would be 100!!! with no resistor in parallel the Q is theoretically infinite.
Tony. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: indonesia
|
Quote:
At first look I thought the "main" inductor for those woofers is the 0.2mH one, as it is a thick wired Solen made inductor, while the 3mH is made of thin wire, and in series with 4.7uF capacitor. ![]() (pcb above is only for midbass, tweeter xo is in separate board) Are these P13s driven full range or does that 0.2mH also serves as lowpass filter ? Iirc a 3mH value would be too low as a lowpass filter for a 5 inch driver. Btw could you comment whether separate xo for each 4 ohm woofer on my drawing above will do the job in replacing one xo for 8ohm drivers in parallel ? tia, salim sm |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jakarta
|
Quote:
Running dedicated (low pass) filter for each woofer will not improve the impedance (it might be slightly worse, and of course, more expensive). The idea of running two woofers in parallel is so that each woofer will have lower SPL (compared to when single woofer is used) so the "breakup point" or peak or resonance is not quickly reached. But because there are two woofers the total SPL is higher than using single woofer. The price is the lower total impedance. Running the two woofers in series will solve the low impedance issue but total SPL will be much lower. Using lower impedance woofers may decrease the SPL but not significance. Using dedicated filter for each woofer may increase the SPL but not significance. Meaning that the original filter can be used for both approaches with no significance effect (on tweeter crossover). That's ASSUMING that the woofers (P13WG-08 and P13WG-04) only differ in nominal impedance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
just another
diyAudio Moderator
|
Hi nakman, I was uncertain what the 3mH and 4.7uF were doing so I decided to model the whole thing (first the notch then with the other as well) interestingly the notch didn't behave exactly as I thought. it actually rolls off from quite a low frequency.
This was done using my own woofers impedance (which is around 4 ohms), and a flat freq response. 1st with only the notch, second with 3mh and 4.7uF added. Tony. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Noob Help: Converting Thomas organ / Wiring | Skullface | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 10th March 2011 09:56 PM |
| Converting two 2-way crossovers two one 3-way crossover - possible? | vshvsh | Multi-Way | 1 | 11th December 2010 09:27 AM |
| mtm crossover | barspin89 | Multi-Way | 3 | 9th December 2007 02:05 PM |
| Speaker design, X-Over, and MTM Questions - Please help a noob! | sbolin | Multi-Way | 39 | 4th October 2004 05:14 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13328 seconds (82.29% PHP - 17.71% MySQL) with 11 queries |