Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th January 2012, 03:21 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Norway
Default Digital time-correction of multiway dipole?

Hi

Is it possible to digital time-align a multiway dipole in both the front and back-direction?

I.e. if one time-align the speakers for the front output of the elements, will they then also be time-aligned for the back output?

(I presume the answer is no...)

Br Gisle
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2012, 01:19 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Rochester, MN
You presume right! At least to my way of thinking.......
John K has an excellent explanation here: Dipole-offset
Been a while since I read it, but if I remember right he considers the baffle to be the acoustic center. This is something I've been wondering about lately, as I have 4-way dipoles, with 3 drivers suspended 'naked', and the woofer in a shallow u-frame. When measuring and setting xo's and looking at phase alignment, having the drivers in line where the baffle would be does not result in time alignment, in the forward or backward planes. I can adjust the drivers offset on Z and get good alignment to the front, but the rear goes to hell..........

What's more important, good time/phase alignment to the front, or equal response front and rear?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2012, 09:56 AM   #3
Rudolf is offline Rudolf  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Rudolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
I have tried to explain my view on the best time alignment here. Don't forget to follow that discussion down the page.

In general I would put emphasis on the direct response (front output), but try to keep the back output free from VERY deep notches.

Rudolf
__________________
www.dipolplus.de
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2012, 10:27 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
john k...'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: US
Quote:
Originally Posted by natehansen66 View Post
You presume right! At least to my way of thinking.......
John K has an excellent explanation here: Dipole-offset
Been a while since I read it, but if I remember right he considers the baffle to be the acoustic center. This is something I've been wondering about lately, as I have 4-way dipoles, with 3 drivers suspended 'naked', and the woofer in a shallow u-frame. When measuring and setting xo's and looking at phase alignment, having the drivers in line where the baffle would be does not result in time alignment, in the forward or backward planes. I can adjust the drivers offset on Z and get good alignment to the front, but the rear goes to hell..........

What's more important, good time/phase alignment to the front, or equal response front and rear?
I only used the baffle as a reference for the example. The point is that the only way to correctly align a dipole from both front and rear is by aligning the AC's of the sources. You can not do it by introducing delays. However, that assumes another issue. Namely that the AC for the front radiation of the source is at the same point as the rear. That may be true for ideal dipole sources, but it is not generally true.
__________________
John k.... Music and Design NaO Dipole Loudspeakers. "We have no right to assume that any physical laws exist, or if they have existed up to now, that will continue to exist in a similar manner in the future." Max Planck
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2012, 11:15 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
On thing that further complicates things is the front/back symmetry of the radiation of different drivers.
This will give you headaches in the crossover regardless how well ACs are physically aligned unless you use "true" dipole drivers (planars) and/or sufficient ways(probably 4 way at least), otherwise what will look like a very linear response in the front might be total mess in the back due to different roll-offs, etc.

I think in the end it's all about a reasonable compromise.
__________________
I don't believe in audio believings.

Last edited by bzfcocon; 12th January 2012 at 11:22 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2012, 01:30 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Norway
Thanks for all the answers!

I will try keep/obtain timecorrection through physical alignment

Br Gisle
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2012, 10:45 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Rochester, MN
Thanks for the link Rudolf, I had forgotten about that thread over there...........and now I need to revisit my driver spacing this weekend!

Audiodidakt - what's the configuration of your speakers, drivers, baffle, etc.....
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2012, 11:01 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Rochester, MN
-

Last edited by natehansen66; 12th January 2012 at 11:02 PM. Reason: removed double post
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th January 2012, 01:55 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Norway
Currently I have no set-up; only spare parts... :-) Those are:

Mundorf AMT2510 (?) tweeter - will be hanging without baffel
Scan-Speak Illuminator 18 med - will be hanging without baffel
Precision Device PD15something - will be in baffel, probably in a cardioid-config.

I have AE TD15M comming in, taking the PD's place.

From about 125 Hz and below I am currently searching for the "best" option. It might be a solution with 4 woofers in a "multi-sub" config.

XO through MiniDSP

Br Gisle
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th January 2012, 04:51 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Breslaan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: South Germany
Quote:
Originally Posted by Audiodidakt
From about 125 Hz and below I am currently searching for the "best" option. It might be a solution with 4 woofers in a "multi-sub" config.
You can use pretty much any decent woofers down there. Wavecor has nice 10"s, 12" and up any modern low frequency dedicated PA woofer can be used e.g. BMS 12S330 for a 12" or PD.1550 for a 15" and many others if you don't plan to use AE's.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I need help with digital Room-correction Radian Multi-Way 1 7th February 2007 07:10 PM
time correction and units alignment Williams Audio Multi-Way 48 21st October 2006 03:19 PM
Time advanced error feedback correction smoking-amp Tubes / Valves 25 13th November 2004 03:24 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:34 AM.

Page generated in 0.11649 seconds (78.63% PHP - 21.37% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio