What is the easiest (or most accurate) way to measure the tuning frequency . . . - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 8th January 2012, 10:45 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
Jimmy154's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NH, USA
Default What is the easiest (or most accurate) way to measure the tuning frequency . . .

of a completed BR enclosure?
I give up lol
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th January 2012, 11:23 PM   #2
Flaesh is offline Flaesh  Russian Federation
diyAudio Member
Flaesh's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eburg
easiest - looking diaph. displacement vs freq.
flesh flash flush
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th January 2012, 11:27 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: alsace
Impedance graph.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th January 2012, 11:46 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
Jimmy154's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NH, USA
I tried both of those. Impedance I don't know how to graph easily. Going by cone movement it looks to be tuned to 25 Hz.
I give up lol
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2012, 12:13 AM   #5
Pano is offline Pano  United States
diyAudio Moderator
Pano's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Kona, Hawaii
Blog Entries: 4
Impedance graph will tell you, it's the best way I know of. The tuning frequency is between the 2 impedance peaks.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2012, 02:59 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto and Delray Beach, FL
Are you interested in results (the sound at your ears) or a specific component?

I've never found design/theory to be any too close to the end product performance. I'd never fuss getting a component right. I'd get right to the final total system performance because the "imperfections" of a component (vis a vis design/theory) might prove to be exactly what is needed to compensate for something else in practice. And sometimes prematurely making a component closer to what you thought you wanted may make the system worse.

I have found this to be esp. true when it comes to crossover frequencies. Anyway... I can't think of any reason to work with anything but multi-amp designs and a tunable e-crossover.

I never cease to be delighted by a free program called REW (from a home-theater website). Runs on a Mac too. All you need is a cheap sound level meter.

Current projects: motional feedback woofing and large ESL panels, and finished putting hundreds of CDs now on a tiny 128GB SDXC chip - but still struggling to get FileMaker14 to work right. HiFi aspirations since 1956

Last edited by bentoronto; 9th January 2012 at 03:01 AM.
  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
best tuning frequency in car muddasirwaheedmalik Car Audio 0 8th December 2011 08:36 PM
Easiest and fastest way to measure a crossover's transfer function? 454Casull Analog Line Level 3 26th August 2009 08:52 AM
Easiest software to measure the Frequency Response -_nando-_ Multi-Way 72 15th July 2007 06:21 PM
Tuning frequency moondust Subwoofers 10 3rd November 2004 03:43 AM
Need help w/ tuning frequency jaybird Multi-Way 5 11th October 2004 10:28 AM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:55 PM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2016 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2016 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2