|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Los Angeles
|
of a completed BR enclosure?
__________________
We do not allow political statements or conjecture to be made on these forums.---the diyAudio moderation team |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eburg
|
easiest - looking diaph. displacement vs freq.
__________________
flesh flash flush |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: alsace
|
Impedance graph.
__________________
crazyhub |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Los Angeles
|
I tried both of those. Impedance I don't know how to graph easily. Going by cone movement it looks to be tuned to 25 Hz.
__________________
We do not allow political statements or conjecture to be made on these forums.---the diyAudio moderation team |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto and Delray Beach, FL
|
Are you interested in results (the sound at your ears) or a specific component?
I've never found design/theory to be any too close to the end product performance. I'd never fuss getting a component right. I'd get right to the final total system performance because the "imperfections" of a component (vis a vis design/theory) might prove to be exactly what is needed to compensate for something else in practice. And sometimes prematurely making a component closer to what you thought you wanted may make the system worse. I have found this to be esp. true when it comes to crossover frequencies. Anyway... I can't think of any reason to work with anything but multi-amp designs and a tunable e-crossover. I never cease to be delighted by a free program called REW (from a home-theater website). Runs on a Mac too. All you need is a cheap sound level meter. Ben
__________________
Dennesen ESL tweets, Dayton-Wright ESL (110-3200Hz), Klipschorn mixed-bass woofer w/param. EQ plus 1954 AR-1W or giant OB HiFi construction since 1956 Last edited by bentoronto; 9th January 2012 at 02:01 AM. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| best tuning frequency in car | muddasirwaheedmalik | Car Audio | 0 | 8th December 2011 07:36 PM |
| Easiest and fastest way to measure a crossover's transfer function? | 454Casull | Analog Line Level | 3 | 26th August 2009 07:52 AM |
| Easiest software to measure the Frequency Response | -_nando-_ | Multi-Way | 72 | 15th July 2007 05:21 PM |
| Tuning frequency | moondust | Subwoofers | 10 | 3rd November 2004 02:43 AM |
| Need help w/ tuning frequency | jaybird | Multi-Way | 5 | 11th October 2004 09:28 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07926 seconds (71.90% PHP - 28.10% MySQL) with 10 queries |