|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hello everyone,
After some research I have came up to a conclusion to use the following drivers for the next project : visaton's aluminium cone woofer AL170 & ceramic tweeter KE25SC. It is a bit difficult to blend them because the woofer shows resonances at ~6 kHz and tweeter's distortion rises below ~2kHz. I have considered a 24db/oct crossover at ~1.6 kHz with a notch filter for the woofer. If tweeter and woofer is wired out of phase in simulations I get good FR and -5 db spl for both at crossover point. However off-axis response(mainly > 40 degress to top) shows large(~15 db) dips at ~1.6 kHz. I can wire both drivers in phase. Then after adjustment of components I get quite good frequency response from 0 to ~60 degress off axis, but both drivers must produce something like 5 db more at crossover point, so I expect distortion of both will be higher. My question is what is more important : better power response(i.e off-axis SPL) or few db less THD? Maybe someone has real-world experience with it ? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eburg
|
i'm avoiding woofers with hf peaks.
and my speakers with exessive headroom allow me to not think about such trifle as spl and distortion.. stupid way. but working goood.
__________________
flesh flash flush Last edited by Flaesh; 7th January 2012 at 10:27 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
Theoretical responses with the drivers out of phase is a very bad idea. A consistent out of phase dip = a consistent in phase response off axis. Stupid cancellation at the c/o point never works well, ever. rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
I think the improved power response looks best, although I don't do it that way myself. At the least, why don't you try to get the phase just so on axis, that the notches will be pointing at the floor and ceiling.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
|
Put a zobel circuit on the woofer, 8-10 ohm and 20 uF. Say goodbye to the 6 kHz peak.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
On re-reading my post, I'd like to clarify a point. Having the drivers in phase on-axis will centre the main lobe. The way you've done it with the flatter looking power response probably has a deep notch just slightly below axis. Try running top to bottom.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Active high dynamics/SPL & high performance loudspeaker system for my living room…! | Robert GS | Multi-Way | 53 | 11th April 2012 05:12 AM |
| OT: how can I measure THD of my amplifier if my sound card is 0,02% THD ? | ygg-it | Solid State | 1 | 13th June 2010 07:54 AM |
| How do I maximize piezo audiable SPL for an alarm system? | Aoxomox | Planars & Exotics | 18 | 19th February 2010 10:23 AM |
| Best off-axis drivers? | Spasticteapot | Multi-Way | 7 | 28th December 2007 10:40 PM |
| SPL@2.83V or SPL@1W ? what is right? | Astro Power | Subwoofers | 6 | 29th December 2005 10:58 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08591 seconds (73.82% PHP - 26.18% MySQL) with 11 queries |