|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Chennai
|
I have just tested this lc audio series two way crossover network on my speakers and they sound fairly decent and not shabby like ar-sxo crossover. I would like to know if i can add an l-pad to the tweeters or rather if l-pads can be used with serial crossovers. secondly i want to know if impedance correction circuits or zobel can be added to a serial network
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
|
yes & yes
__________________
‘today… there lives alongside the twentieth century the tenth or thirteenth. A hundred million people use electricity and still believe in the magic power of signs and exorcisms” Trotsky |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newcastle, Australia
|
If you mean an L-pad using a series resistor and parallel resistor for the tweeter then it works fine but a variable L-pad can have some weird effects. I've never been able to get the latter to work correctly in a series crossover but used a range of parallel resistors that could be externally switched for SPL variations.
Zobels work fine but the complete filter has to be designed to suit. A zobel on the woofer also effects the tweeter roll off in a series xo and in the extreme, will make the tweeter roll off plateau so will have little reduction at Fs. It has to be designed as one circuit as you just can't add a zobel to an existing filter. Model one and you'll see what I mean as every component change effects both the tweeter and woofer. There's nothing wrong with a well designed AR series crossover and in fact most of my speakers use them. They just have to be designed like any other xo to suit the drivers and design. If you use the info on the AR site, there's a low chance of it working correctly. Use it only as a rough guide. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Chennai
|
Since I'm using component values described in the LC audio website...It is not possible for me to know the actual crossover frequency. Is there any way to know(may be a calculation) the crossover frequency...I'm familiar with parallel crossover calculations, but illiterate about series networks..but i love the way these networks sound
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
|
__________________
‘today… there lives alongside the twentieth century the tenth or thirteenth. A hundred million people use electricity and still believe in the magic power of signs and exorcisms” Trotsky |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Chennai
|
I have always struggled designing series crossover because i don't know how to calculate the component value to cutoff a particular frequency.....where as in a parallel network you can easily calculate the capacitor or inductor value for the desired frequency...........
I know that series network work differently but i have found no resource to understand this...what determines the component value for a particular frequency in a first order series crossover... Kindly educate me on this..Thanks a lot |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
|
the equations are in the linked article above
__________________
‘today… there lives alongside the twentieth century the tenth or thirteenth. A hundred million people use electricity and still believe in the magic power of signs and exorcisms” Trotsky |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
If you up the 2R0 resistor in value you end up with a parallel 1st order c/o. If you short it you end up with a series c/o, 1st order bass, 2nd order treble. So its some kind of hybrid, not the easiest to analyse. rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
|
Oh I-pad, not iPad, lol
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
Actually GloBug, it's L pad, due to the way a series and parallel resistor are placed like an 'L' (or more like a '7')
Anyway, a series crossover isn't a great place for a first timer to be. With a basic series crossover, anything you do to bring the impedances closer to flat and equal between each driver (and this means L-pads and zobel networks), the closer the filter itself comes to working as it should. Still though, this doesn't mean that's exactly what each driver happens to need. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need to Pad down PAudio tweeter | bigfishe | Multi-Way | 41 | 27th October 2011 04:37 PM |
| Piezo Tweeter L-Pad? | Ling Gowa | Multi-Way | 6 | 24th November 2009 09:55 PM |
| L pad and series resistor effect on sound | Frankx | Multi-Way | 4 | 31st October 2005 03:10 PM |
| L-pad vs series resistor | AntM | Multi-Way | 1 | 29th July 2005 08:57 AM |
| series crossover with resonance trap for tweeter? | madinoz | Multi-Way | 0 | 8th June 2005 02:03 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09958 seconds (79.88% PHP - 20.12% MySQL) with 11 queries |