I know this is a lower quality driver... why is it modeling so well and why is it so cheap... I am new to this... what spec is off.... is it requiring a low crossover or something? It is modeling very well for 2-3 of them in a port.
http://www.parts-express.com/pedocs/specs/264-1146-parts-express-specifications.pdf
http://www.parts-express.com/pedocs/specs/264-1146-parts-express-specifications.pdf
Low cost high performance Peerless woofer
Most manufacturer's have a sweet spot, and with Peerless it is 5"-12" woofers. There is no manufacturer I know of that can compete with Peerless over all in this kind of driver. Their engineers have consistently delivered high performance, cost effective designs for a couple of decades. Nothing like experience!
No magic, just years of hard work and pro level performance.
Most manufacturer's have a sweet spot, and with Peerless it is 5"-12" woofers. There is no manufacturer I know of that can compete with Peerless over all in this kind of driver. Their engineers have consistently delivered high performance, cost effective designs for a couple of decades. Nothing like experience!
No magic, just years of hard work and pro level performance.
Fyi. a Sub suggestion using two Peerless-160F25PR01 in a ~79 L(~2.82 cu.ft) T-QWP:
b
Attachments
FYI
Agree,Four(Eight drivers in total) in a listening room would be IMO quite perfect...
Another small footprint single folded suggestion:
A T-TQWT using two Peerless-160F25PR01 in a slightly bigger enclosure (109L=~3.87 cu.ft).
b
Attachments
Last edited:
Those pics are too small!FYI
Agree,Four(Eight drivers in total) in a listening room would be IMO quite perfect...
Another small footprint single folded suggestion:
A T-TQWT using two Peerless-160F25PR01 in a slightly bigger enclosure (109L=~3.87 cu.ft).
b
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.