BSC for near wall speakers - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th November 2011, 06:52 PM   #1
Doug76 is offline Doug76  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Doug76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisiana
Default BSC for near wall speakers

I've been giving this a lot of thought. The general idea is the roll off occurs due to baffle width allowing frequencies to go around the speaker. This assumes a free standing speaker, away from boundaries such as walls.
However, with a speaker mounted on the wall, or standing on the floor with it's back against the wall, at some point the wall again comes into play, and you should see the response rise again at frequency wavelengths longer than the combined baffle width/cabinet depth distance, creating more of a broad shallow notch in the response vs a shelving of the response.
What do you think? And if this is true, how does one create a circuit to compensate for this?
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2011, 07:46 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New England
The BS should be less with the speaker next to a wall. All you need do is adjust a standard BSC circuit to have LESS compensation.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2011, 01:29 AM   #3
Doug76 is offline Doug76  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Doug76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisiana
And that I have done for my newest, going with 3db instead of 6db compensation.
Still, it seems to me that because of the wall's proximity, one would likely see a broad and shallow notch rather than the shelving response.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2011, 02:09 AM   #4
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Hi,

Yes you need less overall BSC and yes you will get a severe discontinuity,
unless you build a relatively very wide and shallow box for wall placement.

The problem with most boxes is a severe wall dip, right where you don't want it.
Easy to confirm will any decent box speaker, they sound poor near any wall.

The dip drops in frequency and magnitude the further away from a wall it is.

rgds, sreten.

Worst is a box about the size of your head against a wall, grim stuff.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2011, 11:55 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
speaker dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Mountain, Framingham
Designing principles for near the wall-speakers

Here are some curves of a speaker mounted on wall and an EQ network that corrects for it.

David S.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2011, 12:54 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New England
Quote:
Originally Posted by speaker dave View Post
Designing principles for near the wall-speakers

Here are some curves of a speaker mounted on wall and an EQ network that corrects for it.

David S.
Couldn't find the EQ network at your link.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2011, 02:55 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
speaker dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Mountain, Framingham
The network is not a "network" but the resultant filter response shown in the center graphs. The left curves show an on-wall speaker against the wall and in free space. The curve with accentualted bass and the lower midrange dip is the one against the wall. The cure was to have 2 different switchable networks for the "lower" woofer of a 2 1/2 way design. For free space the usual 1st order rolloff of the lower woofer. For the boundary condition a bumped 2nd order network with the bump very carefully placed at the dip frequency.

2nd group of curves show the resultant 2 pi corrected curve vs. the free space curve. Good correction for a passive network. You could do a little better with an active correction.

Note that these types of corrections must be precisely done for the exact boundary conditions that you are under.

David S.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wall Speakers ? Bigun Full Range 14 20th January 2009 08:30 PM
So, why not in-wall speakers? wigginjs Multi-Way 4 20th August 2007 03:59 AM
BSC vs Bipolar speakers Salsero Full Range 8 24th April 2007 11:04 PM
In-wall recessed speakers Magnetmaz Multi-Way 1 4th June 2003 04:53 AM
In wall speakers bostarob Multi-Way 11 23rd June 2002 07:12 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:29 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2