|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisiana
|
In the old days, when Advent acoustic suspension 2-ways were the norm (showing my age here), it was common to buy another pair, and stack the speaker pairs, with the new pair upside down on the original pair. Most at the time agreed it was a better sounding combination.
I was wondering then, has anyone tried an integrated system using two midwoofers and two tweeters in the MTTM arrangement? And what might be the advantages and/or pitfalls of such an arrangement? I'm asking specifically on the MTTM design. Your thoughts please. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
They were just fooled by the extra loudness. You cannot stack two tweeters. The interference patterns will be horrid. The only way to stack tweeters is to stack very many and make a line source out of them.
__________________
High current requirement is the bane of high fidelity |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Indonesia
|
i heard dynaudio temptation with MTTM and double woofer top and bottom at the recent av show, it was very good. effortless, and very BIG soundstage.
cheers henry |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
|
Quote:
Furthermore, in an ambient spaces, the power response holes from the lobing between two tweeters tend to fill in as reverberant energy. Is it ideal? I don't think so. But I think it's an approach that has its merits. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
RockLee, the OP was asking about two tweeters, not one and a half.
Dynaudio have gone to the extreme and managed to mount two tweeters and two mids on the same custom-made front plate. Despite their frantic efforts to squeeze the little buggers as tight as common decency would alow, there are some sizeable interference effects messing up measurement: Dynaudio Evidence Temptation loudspeaker Measurements part 2 | Stereophile.com Just imagine two tweeters on their normal, big faceplates, and some baffle and some topside thickness intervening, and that's considering only the two tweets. The mid-tweet interactions are a whole new ballgame.
__________________
High current requirement is the bane of high fidelity |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MTTM advantages/disadvantages? | jjkozlow | Multi-Way | 17 | 16th January 2012 05:30 AM |
| CD24 Play Format | fmak | Digital Source | 7 | 1st April 2011 12:58 PM |
| Which format to rip cds? | Godzilla | Digital Source | 35 | 7th January 2008 01:46 PM |
| ADAT Format | fmak | Digital Source | 18 | 24th December 2003 07:24 AM |
| MTTM | John L | Multi-Way | 8 | 31st October 2001 02:59 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09956 seconds (79.11% PHP - 20.89% MySQL) with 10 queries |