|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
In a 2 way speaker with a 1st order crossover how easily can I convert it to 4th order? what considerations are there?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
|
Add 3 orders?
Every order adds 90 degrees ultimate phase roatation, but only half of that will be seen at the crossover point. Adding 3 orders will advance your tweeter response 135 degrees and retard the woofer response 135 degrees. Hard to say if they will add well after that. Also note that as crossovers go higher order the design gets more complex and the ability to get sections to add smoothly is harder. Are we doing proper design here with network simulation and good measurments to guide the process, or just guessing a network? You can't guess a 4th order network and expect to get lucky. David S. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Birmingham, UK
|
Don't forget the 1st order shift which is already there in the originals so the total shift with a 4th order network would be 360deg between tweet and woof.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
|
3 x 45 = 135 for each section. So 270 degree total additional change which is the same as a 90 degree relative spread, assuming the units were well in phase to begin with.
David |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lyon
|
Quote:
It's better to give more information : drivers reference, drivers diameter. The problem is to know the final acoustic slope 1st/2nd or 4th/6th. This is an exemple of conversion of a njord kit like It was done with measurements and I try to get the best of the drivers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
why cant you just use the same crossover point and make the crossover slope a fourth order? do you have to change the mounting point of the drive units?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lyon
|
Quote:
It's better to stay in a linear range... Low order crossover : high point of crossover to protect the tweeter, because of its resonance Higher order, lower the point of crossover to be in a better pistonic range for the woofer Not necessarily |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Birmingham, UK
|
Quote:
The usual argument goes that 1st order phase shift is too small to be audible. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
what does cone breakup sound like?
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
|
The 1st order electrical filter may have relatively small phase shift but that isn't the whole picture. The total acoustical phase shift is always the issue, and it is the combination of electrical phase shift and phase shift from interunit time delay. Drivers with first order filters aren't guaranteed to add up unless the driver depth is just right. This is why the ideal crossover slope is more a function of the particular drivers you have chosen than any notions of best phase response.
David |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1st order Passive Line Level Crossover + 2nd order Highpass? | alexclaber | Multi-Way | 11 | 4th January 2008 07:15 PM |
| deceptive perception ? 1st order-2nd order question | poldus | Multi-Way | 4 | 10th April 2007 11:58 PM |
| My 1st order butterworth filter better than 4th order L-R: Why? | philipreji | Solid State | 61 | 1st March 2007 04:50 PM |
| 1st Order Tweeter, 3rd Order Woofer? | Jay | Multi-Way | 8 | 8th May 2004 09:29 PM |
| 1st order ? L-R 2nd order? or transient perfect?? | Ken L | Multi-Way | 6 | 17th October 2003 04:22 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10292 seconds (79.06% PHP - 20.94% MySQL) with 10 queries |