Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 8th February 2012, 03:18 PM   #11
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Hi,

Software can replicated the response of vented systems, in the time and
frequency domain. What it cannot do is be a physical port and what that
does to max SPL, max power and cone excursion over the bass range.

The only downside of venting is what happens below the port frequency,
that is one reason why I like low tunings. I trying not to tell what the
real issues are so you can find them yourself but one of them is :

How do you fancy your SR71 having the SPL capability of 4 of the
bass drivers at the port tuning frequency ? i.e. you have the
equivalent of a 13" driver with +/-6mm (+) around 40Hz ?

Software can't do that, it is your understanding that is "clumsy".

rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 07:47 PM   #12
diyAudio Member
 
kipman725's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London/N.lincs
Send a message via MSN to kipman725
Quote:
Originally Posted by Syzygies View Post
One could interpret this as saying that porting a given driver plays louder without appreciable distortion, with better bass response. These are surely democratic attributes of a speaker, as anyone (even with hearing loss) can tell if a speaker plays loud with good bass. I listen at low to moderate levels, at odd hours in a solid-walled apartment building. That last octave of bass is what I hear from other apartments, and by giving it up I've never had complaints.
Yes but the other side of this is if one can afford the greater box volume and more drivers needed to achive the same SPL and excursion with sealed the result is better due to the lack of all the issues that ports cause. Also consider what happens below tuning in a ported speaker, I consider a high pass filter on ported speakers needed unless they are tuned very low.
__________________
CHR-70+Subs
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 08:11 PM   #13
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Hi,

My heavily EQ'd speakers run at modest volume but good bass extension.

I can't hear the last octave of low bass in other rooms of my flat,
nevermind bothering the neighbours. Reference to loudness curves
will show "annoying" bass is far higher up than the last octave.

That is unless of course, your speakers have no real deep bass.

Due to the curves (and the way some walls are built) its the one
note thump at higher volumes in the upper bass that really annoys.

You can enjoy really deep bass at modest volume without
annoying anyone, and the satisfaction of very low bass
being present means you need less real volume.

rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2012, 12:19 PM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Default Zaph ZRT

Guys:

Thank you Sreten for addressing the original question I asked, which was if a 1/4" difference on the width of a Parts Express cabinet would affect the Zaph design. I could not imagine that it would, but I have no abilty to do these complex calculations that so many of you are able to do.

I've been wanting to try a pair of those curved PE cabinets, and Madisound is close by, so the Zaph ZRT looks like a very good option.

The other comments are also interesting, but in my case I have no interest in the SR71 kit anyway.

Again, thank you for the answer!

Homebuilder
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone have Zaph ZRT Revelators in New York City? bfs21 Multi-Way 1 23rd April 2012 03:52 AM
Current Project: Zaph ZRT 2.5 - A Change of Methodology bmwman91 Multi-Way 23 11th January 2012 09:48 PM
Zaph ZRT Tweeter Placement ciagon Multi-Way 0 14th March 2010 06:25 AM
Sealed ZRT or sealed ZD5 sapek Multi-Way 2 8th May 2009 05:32 PM
Zaph ZRT -vs- ProAc 2.5 clone jallenbass Multi-Way 4 23rd August 2008 02:15 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24 AM.

Page generated in 0.08059 seconds (73.11% PHP - 26.89% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio