|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
Two text book 2nd order butterworth filters at 2k5, this looks like a good start. With the L-pad in place your impedances should be reasonably well behaved.
It is more common to use filters with Q=0.5 as they add to flat on axis. Without measuring the actual needs of the drivers though, I think it would be pedantic to say you should change anything just now. You'll want to play with your tweeter level and polarity for now. Do you have an equaliser? If you can manage to adjust any problems out, you can the translate your settings into crossover changes. |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ny
|
AllenB, yes the polarity on the T121 will be revered and I plan to temporarily install a L pad on the tweeter to get the balance right then replace with resistors. I guess the BW has a Q=0.7 so you are saying go for a Q=0.5?
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
Without some design work (measurements and so forth) it is difficult to guess what order of filter each half should have, what Q, what polarity etc. You need to start somewhere and what you have is reasonable.
So when I say go for q=0.5, that takes into account the varying impedance, the phase of the impedance (it's effect on the filter), the existing acoustic response, then when it comes to matching the two, the acoustic phase and all that led up to it. This is why I'm suggesting that it may not be helpful to get too caught up in the details this early in the process. |
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
|
Hi jimbones !
Quote:
If you want to get the best out of the 17W's, install each one in a separate 15 liters sealed box in MTM configuration and you will get clean F3=50 Hz. I suggest you build a real life x-over like the one attached and experiment with different values of resistor R, whose sole purpose is to attenuate tweeter sound pressure and level it out with midwoofers. In your case, if implemented well and a bit of luck you could get decent sounding speakers with sensitivity at about 89 dB/2,83V/1m. Last edited by Lojzek; 11th February 2012 at 12:59 PM. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hawksford output error correction circuit? | Jorge | Solid State | 96 | 12th December 2011 11:31 PM |
| Has anyone tried this BS correction circuit? | G | Full Range | 4 | 14th January 2008 09:11 PM |
| MLTL minus correction circuit | Shae | Full Range | 3 | 11th October 2007 12:48 PM |
| MLTL correction circuit position | Lostcause | Full Range | 7 | 24th September 2005 01:10 PM |
| Dynaudio D28AF Correction | whitney | Swap Meet | 0 | 14th February 2004 05:23 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07278 seconds (75.94% PHP - 24.06% MySQL) with 11 queries |