|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
|
I see alot of threads around this... is it just an SPL versus difficulty to drive question?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Cary, NC, USA
|
Parallel cuts it in half!
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
|
Lower impedance = more current from amplifier
__________________
Building a 2.1 system out of a 3/4"x4'x8' sheet |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
|
Many solid-state amplifiers have a sweet-spot in about the 4 to 8 Ohm range.
Some will go lower (a few much lower) and still operate properly. But amplifier designers like Doug Self write that it's not a good idea to go low.
__________________
Kevin |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
|
Okay. I thought it remained the same and the SPL was just increased. I have alot to learn.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Take 1 driver. 1 voice coil, 1 cone, one amplifier. Driven with 2.83 volts rms the driver produces 88dB. As we are assuming the driver has a perfectly flat impedance, that is 8 ohms, the driver also draws 0.35 amps rms from the amplifier.
If you now take a second driver and wire it in series with the first you've got 2 voice coils, 2 cones and one amplifier. The drive level is exactly the same = 2.83 volts rms, . In series the impedance doubles to 16 ohms, 2.83 volts rms is still dropped across the combined voice coils. As we're dealing with 16 ohms now the current halves to 0.175 amps rms. 0.175 amps now flows through each voice coil meaning that each coil has 2.83/2 volts rms across it. Lets look at this in terms of power. P = V*I In the first instance the driver sees P = 2.83*0.35 = 1 watt. In the second instance each driver sees P = (2.83/2)* 0.175 = 1/4 of a watt. Both drivers together = 1/2 of a watt. So in going from 8 to 16 ohms the total electrical power has halved. The method of scaling powers against one another = 10log * (P2/P1) = 10log * ( 0.5/1) = -3dB. So in other words you lose 3dB of electrical power when you wire two drivers in series when compared to a single driver on its own. However this isn't the end of the story. As you've got two cones with the two drivers in series this also means you've got twice the radiating area or twice the acoustic power vs the single driver, the net effect is that you lose 3dB of electrical power, but you gain 3dB of acoustic power so in the end you're still at 88dB. Now lets look at parallel. Two coils, two cones, one amplifier, but now the coils are wired in parallel with one another. Each 8 ohm coil sees 2.83 volts RMS and as we saw for the first driver on it's own this = 0.35amps rms or 1 watt. As we've got two coils in parallel this time and because each coil has 2.83 volts rms across it we've now got a total of two watts of electrical power. If we pop this into the power formula we now get. 10log * (2/1) = +3. So we've doubled the electrical power and gained 3dB because of it. Now though as we've got two cones vs one we've also doubled the acoustic power, so we've gained another 3dB too, so we're up +6dB vs the single driver on its own. At least I think I've got that right, it's been a while since I've thought about it.
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack! |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
|
Yes. I see. Not to difficult and a great explanation. I have copied it for future reference as a reminder. So I keep the ohms for the "cones and domes" between 4 and 8 ohms and this and my SPL are what guide me in this decision. If I am running three drivers could I run two in series and one parallel and it still sound natural? Just curious. Also. Is it better for distortion reasons on the driver to choose series or parallel? Would distortion be a guiding factor?
Thanks 5th element! |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Chennai
|
I have a handful of 4 ohm mid woofers ,but my technics amp impedance range is between 8 and 16 ohms..I have read somewhere that connecting two drivers in series is not a good idea...how far is this true
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Timisoara
|
Series is the only safe way to go with that amplifier and those drivers.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
Chris |
||
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Parallel/Series crossover wiring question | cerupcat | Full Range | 7 | 21st November 2011 05:25 AM |
| 15 ohms (12 on ohmmeter) with 24 ohms resistor in parallel to bring to 8 ohms | McIntosh Man | Multi-Way | 29 | 11th June 2010 05:36 PM |
| Wiring series and then parallel with switch | hemos | Power Supplies | 4 | 17th November 2008 01:34 AM |
| Parallel/Series Wiring Question | Javachip | Multi-Way | 3 | 19th September 2006 04:25 AM |
| Series and Parallel wiring power requirements? | Arbury | Multi-Way | 4 | 31st December 2001 03:09 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.66499 seconds (9.63% PHP - 90.37% MySQL) with 11 queries |