![]() |
Question about "old" technology: the wiiide baffle of the Boston Acoustics "A" series
Besides being a fan of BA speakers (before their takeover by D&M) this series of large floorstanding speakers, equipped with a 10" acoustic-suspension woofer, sold during much of the 1980s has always intrigued me because of their very wide baffles. IIRC those baffles were employed to better "launch" the sound waves from the tweeter, and midrange if so equipped.
I fully realize such a design is not "commercially viable" nowadays and its WAF is very low, but I don't care about either of those issues (though I do think they look pretty cool ;)). I just want to know if there are any sonic advantages to using a wide baffle for the floorstanders I am considering building. Thanks! Since there is now a new "A" series that just debuted (typical narrow tower, dual small woofers etc etc), finding pics of the originals became more difficult, so here are some I found myself: A100 - 2-way version* (I don't know this guy - I'm just using his page for reference sake) A150 - 3-way version A200 - "up scale" 3-way version. The woofer, which is different than the other A series' woofers, is mounted much lower in this model (the speaker pictured on the left is equipped with the original version); there is a later model equipped with dual 8" woofers * I think this version is the most elegant: because of its simple 2-way design and its clean styling with pleasing ratios. And a version with black woodgrain - NOT black gloss paint - I think would look even better. |
Yes.
With a large baffle, BSC is required only for a smaller portion of the bass spectrum, if at all, and therefore the power response attained from true half-space radiation is uniform for a wider range of the audible frequency spectrum. Power requirements will go down. The drawbacks are: 1) ugly (usually) 2) the transducing elements (cones/domes) are small compared to the baffle and therefore will effect larger dips and peaks in the response due to baffle diffraction until such frequencies where beaming occurs. This can be modeled in various software such as Edge. Putting the drivers off-center, or better yet, using sizeable amounts of foam/felt/fiberglass to attenuate the waves traveling along the baffle, will reduce this effect. Wide-baffle speakers (some people call them monkey coffins) are just a hop and skip away from in-wall systems, which tend to have much better power response than typical 2/3-way narrow floorstanders. |
The change in directivity index is brought closer the the Schroeder frequency (at least that's the way I've been looking at it). I've had a penchant for wider baffles for decades and feel it is one way to achieve a more balanced bass/mid region.
|
Here's something I posted in another thread that seems to be of relevance here too.
Quote:
|
Quote:
Poor Man' Admittedly a curved baffle is tricky to make. I guess it can be done with Corian, for a price. I'm not sure what the deal is about steam-bending plywood either. |
I owned the Boston A100s in the mid eighties and have fond memories of them. They were my first "hi-fi" speaker and were my inspiration for my latest project.
The main advantages I have found with the wide baffle is a better presentation of bass, especially male voices, and better efficiency (less baffle step compensation required). Also if you are in a situaiton where you HAVE to put your speakers close to the wall (probably most of us), a wide-baffle speaker tends to reduce the negative impacts of such a placement. Negatives -: - more susceptible to diffraction effects so attention needs to be made to asymmetric driver placement or curving/beveling the baffle edges. - Imaging is not as precise as a narrow baffle, but some would say that pinpoint imaging is not very realistic anyway. - Size and weight (the main reason they lost favor with most manufacturers). The best overall summation I've heard is that narrow baffles bring the performers into your room, wide baffles take you to the recording venue. In an era of wide-screen TVs, I dont see a wide baffle speaker presenting much of a WAF issue. http://www.gattiweb.com/images/apoll...easurement.jpg Gattiweb |
Quote:
The concern is that after you consider the directivity of the tweeter, beaming of the woofer, and the baffle step, do they all line up across the spectrum to form a smooth 'homogenous' transition? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
A good exmple http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attac...ormiva_iso.gif dave |
When i worked retail hifi we sold a ton of these BA. I remember a very memorable Sunday afternoon where we did a number of bsic mods to a set of A200s and transformed them.
dave |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:31 PM. |
vBulletin Optimisation provided by
vB Optimise (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 30.00%)
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio