|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
|
hi all
i am trying to understand passive crossover design for 3-way speakers. when all three drivers are connected to signal source (amplifier) then how much impedance the amplifier sees? assume all three have 8 ohms of impedance. thanks, pranam |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
Here is an example of a fairly typical crossover.
The woofer impedance is in yellow and the tweeter impedance is in blue. This is the way they are seen individually from before the crossover, i.e. from the amps point of view. The combined impedance is shown in red. In this case the impedance is higher around the crossover point and the individual drivers virtually leave the circuit out of their range so the three will not really be in parallel. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cascais
|
In one word is 8 ohms. But minimum impedance can be lower, look at the impedance curve of drivers. Usually 6 ohm or similar in this case. Final min. impedance dependent of the crossover design and drivers. Plus cables.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
|
Quote:
also which software you are using to generate the impedance curves |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
|
Quote:
thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Quote:
The power amplifier has a finite output impedance. The speaker has a finite impedance. The voltage at the speaker is Vout * (Rload / (Rload+Rout)) let's put some numbers in to that equation. Vout = 10Vac Rout = 0r5 Rload = 8r0 The speaker voltage = 10*8/(8+0.5) = 9.41Vac. The power available at the speaker terminals is V^2 / Rload = 9.41^2/8 = 11.07W Let the impedance at the crossover rise to 10ohms. Rload becomes 10r0. The power available at the speaker terminals is 9.07W. Gee whiz we have lost 2W !! But, the speaker manufacturer designs the speaker to have a flat sounding frequency response, when fed with a flat Voltage response. The speaker instead of reading 9W vs 11 W reads 9.5Vac instead of 9.4Vac. This is an increase of 0.1dB. Almost certainly not audible. As the Power Amplifier output impedance (and all the other impedances of the cables and connectors) gets lower than slight increase of 0.1dB in the example gets even less. At the limit, if the output impedance is zero the gain/loss as speaker impedance changes is 0dB.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
The impedance is normally higher, but you can cross any way you like so it really depends. If you stick to the normal ways of crossing it should be reasonably predictable.
If you want to flatten this kind of peak you might add a tuned circuit (RCL) across the amp. The impedance is higher, but then there is energy storage around the crossover region. I'm not sure I understand your question about attenuation. You can set the levels where you want them. Some crossovers have a flat response on axis but a reduced power response. For what it's worth, I use a crossover just below 1kHz. The software is xoversim. The curves were measured and the crossover simmed onto them. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Quote:
if the speaker designer designed the driver and crossover combination to give an apparent flat sounding frequency response, without using a Zobel across one and/or other driver, when fed a flat electrical signal (i.e. flat with respect to voltage), then adding a Zobel does two things. It reduces the efficiency of the speaker. Not at all popular nowadays. The Zobel also reduces the voltage seen by the driver at the Zobel's frequency. This creates a dip in the frequency response.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Amplifier-speaker matching impedance | djrama | Solid State | 13 | 3rd October 2010 07:29 PM |
| Total impedance when running tweeter in parallel with a FE206E? | G | Full Range | 24 | 11th April 2008 07:24 PM |
| Amplifier impedance and pot selection | dre7 | Tubes / Valves | 15 | 24th October 2007 10:57 PM |
| total speaker impedance | amoeba86 | Multi-Way | 10 | 28th July 2003 10:08 PM |
| measuring Input impedance of an Amplifier | pinkmouse | Solid State | 5 | 23rd May 2002 08:15 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10975 seconds (88.76% PHP - 11.24% MySQL) with 11 queries |