|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ny
|
I am upgrading my DM 640's and because they are "old" some are saying that they are dated. What would you say is the speaker systems weakest link? Bass driver, Mid, tweeter? I am going to upgrade the XO parts. I have my idea of where to make some mods and I wanted to see if your opinions were similar to mine. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Driver technology hasn't exactly changed in the past few years, but it entirely depends where and what price point these were originally put at and what kind of performance B&W were wanting them to have.
The drivers are probably decent but nothing amazing and the crossover is probably a design of minimal component count to cut costs, but probably not cost cutting to the point of degrading the performance to an unacceptable level. Then there's the designers own personal philosophies, these sometimes clash with what others would consider optimal and might push the design towards sounding something like you would not prefer. Of course it could work the other way around too. According to the B&W service manual all of the capacitors used in the design are of the electrolytic variety. These are perfectly acceptable but do not stand the test of time particularly well. The DM640s design is 20 years old. I would recommend you change the electrolytics for either new electrolytics or go for film caps. The service manuals can be found here. Service Manuals As a recommendation I'd keep C1 and the C2 that is paired with R3 as electrolytics, but replace C4, C5 and the C2 that goes before R1 with decent film caps. If the price of C2, as an 85uF film cap, is a bit much (and I agree it is expensive) I'd buy a 70-80uF electrolytic cap and parallel it with a film cap to make up the remainder. Solens basic series of film cap are fine. Solen Capacitors: Madisound Speaker Store As are Bennics lytic caps. Bennic Capacitors: Madisound Speaker Store You can parallel up any combination of capacitors to arrive at the required capacitance.
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack! |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 46
|
Ferrite-cored inductors. Resistive pad used to bring down the sensitivity of the mid. Non-polar electrolytics.
Go active.
__________________
I think ideas are what you want to get rid of. I don't really like songs with ideas. - Leonard Cohen |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ny
|
Right on. I am doing the XO ordering parts today. Thats funny how you picked up the mid being a little lod abraxalito. I was thinking it but was not planning to do anything. I'll now have to consider that. I think the high end tweeter sounds good. I'll follow up with results. Just a thought, as far as drivers I would keep the mid and tweeter but the 8 in woofers are probably the weakerst link there. They are a bit slow and do not have a ton of detail? Are there any good 8in drivers I could try? Seas?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ny
|
he C2 that goes before R1 with decent film caps" Don't you mean C3?
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hmm C3 doesn't exist for me at all in the service manual for the DM640. The manual for the DM640i however does list C3.
I'll do this the easy way. DM640. ![]() DM640i. ![]() The 640i lists C3. There's nothing inherently bad about a good quality electrolytic although most will claim that foil sound better. Foil certainly have the advantage of stability vs time, but can end up costing a lot for large values. C5 in both designs is quite large in value and would represent a decent cost. You could go lytic here for the majority of the capacitance and parallel in a foil for the remainder. As abraxalito states, there is nothing wrong with going active, but to do it properly will require certain expertise and most likely certain hardware upgrade too. The bass qualities you speak of could be due to a lot of things and are unlikely to be caused by the bass drivers them selves. The subjective description of slow bass could be caused by room interactions with the loudspeakers or could stem from poor room integration because of the alignment the boxes are tuned to. The loudspeakers are ported, I take it you've tried stuffing the ports with a sock or moving the loudspeakers around a bit?
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack! |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 46
|
Quote:
__________________
I think ideas are what you want to get rid of. I don't really like songs with ideas. - Leonard Cohen |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I think your probably over emphasising the effect that the inductor could be having on the sound. There is nothing wrong with using cored inductors providing they are of decent design and aren't over driven.
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack! |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lyon
|
I will not tweak the B&W DM640. According to your feeling, you could have a problem with your electronic, amplifier, source ? Your amplifier can't supply correctly the 2x8inch ! A 8 inch is fast in the bass !
Try a better amplifier first and after if necessary a better CD player ? Note for me a good amplifier looks like this : Sugden A21ai Series 2 integrated amplifier | Stereophile.com Accuphase Laboratory, Inc.?E-250 etc. You can do it yourself or test... Or Change the speaker, go to a 8 ohms, one with a 10" ? Make a proven design : Jenzen CA You can wait for a "better" version with high end drivers. There are other design on his website ... Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 46
|
Well I didn't say anything about whether its 'wrong' to use cored inductors. As you pointed out those designs are over 20 years old, they even pre-date my time at the company. They're just not very transparent, having easily measurable distortion (so I'm led to believe, not having passive speakers with ferrite cored inductors around to test myself). More recent B&W designs tend to use air-cored inductors where possible (like my own CM1s) or at least a core material appreciably more linear than ferrite.
__________________
I think ideas are what you want to get rid of. I don't really like songs with ideas. - Leonard Cohen |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| enclosure size for 2 B&W's | eastonc | Subwoofers | 2 | 12th February 2011 07:52 AM |
| Upgrading m&K subwoofer with Peerless driver | qguy | Subwoofers | 0 | 3rd July 2010 01:13 AM |
| upgrading the sonic impact t amp | hmiko | Class D | 7 | 30th October 2009 12:30 AM |
| Upgrading my tube amp | pjpoes | Instruments and Amps | 5 | 27th September 2005 03:10 AM |
| Upgrading Transistors for Low Power Amp | PTL60 | Solid State | 12 | 7th February 2002 12:15 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.14478 seconds (81.52% PHP - 18.48% MySQL) with 11 queries |