Wavecor 6.5" WF160WA02 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st September 2011, 11:11 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Western Sydney
Default Wavecor 6.5" WF160WA02

Just ordered a couple of these:
6.25" - 4 Ohm - Ferrite - WF160WA02

Their siblings seem to test well in all reviews I've seen, & they seem to be good value at AUD 50 each. If anyone in the Sydney region has distortion measuring capabilities & the time to test these I'm willing to subject them to the rack.
__________________
Impedance varies with frequency, use impedance plots of your drivers and make crossover calculations using the actual impedance of the driver at the crossover frequency
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th September 2011, 01:59 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Western Sydney
received these today, quick service from Soundlabs.
They're very well packaged, with their own box & foam inserts - better than the Seas drivers I received recently!
The frame rings quite strongly (I was too tight to buy the cast frame version), so that'll need some attention, otherwise look well made... listening & TS tests this weekend
__________________
Impedance varies with frequency, use impedance plots of your drivers and make crossover calculations using the actual impedance of the driver at the crossover frequency
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th September 2011, 09:40 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Western Sydney
initial measurements, both drivers similar: Fs 59, Vas 11 L, Qm 9.5, Qe .6 Qt .56
published, Fs 48, Vas 25.5, Qm 7, Qe .46 Qt .42
__________________
Impedance varies with frequency, use impedance plots of your drivers and make crossover calculations using the actual impedance of the driver at the crossover frequency
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2011, 10:35 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Western Sydney
after initial reservations - they look puny beside an ER18RNX, smaller magnet & overall size, after listening, they can pump some serious bass.... they don't have the forward character of the SEAS, just good solid low end. (I think I was lucky in that my 36L test cabs are ~ the right size for these drivers). These would be great for rock music,two per side would probably be awesome. Have yet to listen to them run full range.
__________________
Impedance varies with frequency, use impedance plots of your drivers and make crossover calculations using the actual impedance of the driver at the crossover frequency
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2011, 06:38 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
jerome69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lyon
I follow your monologue since a while
But I'm interesting in these wavecor drivers. Can you give some precision ?
What do you think the bass (already described ), the mid bas, the upper mid, and the treble ? Do think it is a well balance driver ?

For example, i know well the ER18RNX, i can say that, in a BR box the bass is tight and goes low. I tried a TL, it was not a success, Qt was too low.
The mid bass is fantastic, the best I've heard after the magnesium cone, very clean and with good transient. This driver could be an excellent midbass, John k.'s Nao note uses them in this range.
Things becomes wrong in the upper mid and treble, too bright, almost aggressive, not very clear sound, miss a little sweetness ... The balance of the overall sound of this driver is too bright.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2011, 11:13 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Western Sydney
Bon soir Jerome, I don't know about precision, but only my impressions... the solid low end is the outstanding feature of these drivers in this 36L box tuned to ~ 40Hz. It doesn't go super low like for example my 10" Peerless, but from 40Hz up is excellent. Mid bass is good too. Vocals have only a slight loss of highs, but the high end must fall off rapidly, no cymbals. The coating on the paper seems to act a bit like polypropylene. Paired with a good tweeter, they'd probably make a good 2 way. My initial idea was to make a 2.5 way using either these or the 5" version, (but I got side-tracked when I bought the Er18RNX). But the quantity of bass may mean that BSC would only need to be minimal. My next step is to build 20L boxes for the ER18s & see if they work well together with the Wavecors. What size box did you use?
__________________
Impedance varies with frequency, use impedance plots of your drivers and make crossover calculations using the actual impedance of the driver at the crossover frequency
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2011, 12:32 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
jerome69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lyon
Bonsoir Pete, (for me -8H time difference to Sydney)

Thanks for the feedback.

I used 2 x ER18NX 33L@43Hz. Crossover frequency 2.6kHz LR4. The tweeter is the monacor DT300+Waveguide. For one woofer, 20L@43Hz is a good choice

Click the image to open in full size.Click the image to open in full size.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2011, 06:45 PM   #8
alspe is offline alspe  Finland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Finland/Tampere
What specialities these have against Seas for example?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2011, 07:59 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
jerome69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lyon
You talk about wavecor ?

I don't think the WF160WA02 is the same class of driver than the ER18.
Good sounding paper cone are not an easy task. See Scanspeak cone or Nextel cone ...
The wavecor could be a more easy driver to listen...

Edit : Wavecor has a new range of 7" driver nomex cone and paper cone with a new basket. They seem to be serious challengers to the ER18.

Perless sems to have drivers in the same category but the ER18 is a top class driver in the bass and the midbass. Perhaps some alu drivers can do as good (835025) .

Last edited by jerome69; 12th September 2011 at 08:05 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2011, 08:35 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Western Sydney
I agree, the Wavecor are good, but not in the same class as the ER18.
- but they're cheap here, and seem to be an easy driver to crossover. (I don't think the 7" is available here)

Thanks for the info on your boxes Jerome, the size & tuning is right on what I was thinking. My plan is to do a 'no BSC' crossover, probably series, for the Seas drivers and add a .5 woofer, which will be the Wavecor initially, just to see if it can keep up. But I suspect I may need someting bigger & better - like Troel's new Janzen design...
__________________
Impedance varies with frequency, use impedance plots of your drivers and make crossover calculations using the actual impedance of the driver at the crossover frequency
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wavecor 2.75-in. fullrange as in-dash speaker Maytag Snow Car Audio 0 21st February 2011 09:24 AM
F/S Wavecor 7" Nomex Cone ~ Balanced Drive Woofers rubicon Swap Meet 5 5th January 2011 08:28 PM
Anybody have experience of any Wavecor drivers? SOSx Multi-Way 3 23rd July 2010 06:47 PM
Wavecor Listening Impressions rhythmdiy Multi-Way 0 12th October 2008 06:29 PM
anybody experienced wavecor drivers? rhythmdiy Multi-Way 24 18th October 2007 01:25 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:14 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2